Rescuing History from the Nation pdf epub mobi txt 電子書 下載2025
Prasenjit Duara is chair of the department of history at the University of chicago. He is the author of Culture, Power, and the State: Rural North China, 1900-1942 and Sovereignty and Authentcity: Manchukuo and the East Asian Modern.
- 曆史
- 杜贊奇
- 民族主義
- 海外中國研究
- nationalism
- nation-state
- 海外漢學
- 政治
Prasenjit Duara offers the first systematic account of the relationship between the nation-state, nationalism, and the concept of linear history. Focusing primarily on China and including discussion of India, Duara argues that many historians of postcolonial nation-states have adopted a linear, evolutionary history of the Enlightenment/colonial model. As a result, they have written repressive, exclusionary, and incomplete accounts.
The backlash against such histories has resulted in a tendency to view the past as largely constructed, imagined, or invented. In this book, Duara offers a way out of the impasse between constructionism and the evolving nation; he redefines history as a series of multiple, often conflicting narratives produced simultaneously at national, local, and transnational levels. In a series of closely linked case studies, he considers such examples as the very different histories produced by Chinese nationalist reformers and partisans of popular religions, the conflicting narratives of statist nationalists and of advocates of federalism in early twentieth-century China. He demonstrates the necessity of incorporating contestation, appropriation, repression, and the return of the repressed subject into any account of the past that will be meaningful to the present. Duara demonstrates how to write histories that resist being pressed into the service of the national subject in its progress—or stalled progress—toward modernity.
具體描述
讀後感
历史不再纯粹地关心过去究竟发生了什么。所谓真实历史的问题，本身遭到了质疑和解构。存在于叙述象征之中的历史，而不是所谓的过去存在之全部，才能被把握被想象。于是决定历史如何呈现的不仅仅是过去，还有现在。杜赞奇提出“复线的历史”（bifurcated history），来反思...
評分20世纪60年代以来，受西方学术界“语言学转向”（linguistic turn）的影响，历史学家认识到：“历史叙述的功能像其它的意识形态论述一样，并不是透明地、而是具有道德和政治上的意味来展示现实的”，因而，“把叙述学的理论视角应用于我们所探求的关于过去的叙述实践中”就非常...
評分花了一个多星期的时间才把美籍印度裔历史学家杜赞奇的《从民族国家拯救历史：民族主义话语与中国现代史研究》看完，期间有很多事干扰了对这本书的阅读，当然此书中难懂的话语也是阅读如此缓慢的原因之一。杜赞奇是研究中国问题的专家，他的另外一本名著是《文化、权力与国...
評分从鸦片战争到四六宪法——地方自治在中国的一百年 序言一：宪政与历史主义 Question1：人类历史的发展有一个确定的方向吗？台湾的宪政实践是历史的偶然吗？大陆的宪政选择将是历史的必然吗？ 历史是进步的：神话时代——英雄时代——平民时代；奴隶时代——封建时代——资本主...
評分杜赞奇（Prasenjit Duara ）是个有趣的汉学家。他与其他汉学家的不同点在于身份——与大多数出身欧美或日本的汉学家不同，他来自与中国近邻，同样被视作东方文化的代表而又截然不同的印度。 印度之于中国，关系历史悠久而又深远，但两种异质文化的互相打量却又往往意味深长。然...
用戶評價
Chap 1&2
评分沒有民族主義這條線作串聯，中國近代史就是一堆碎片。Rescue history from the nation? Rescue你個大頭鬼。從你手裡rescue還差不多。
评分Rescue the writing of history, yes, but rescue the History ???
评分中間幾章很不錯，比如反滿的民族主義如何把秘密會社和革命黨人聯結起來，以及辛亥革命後短暫的聯省自治、知識分子們關於聯邦體製的激辯。但是沒理解全書的general thesis…
评分杜先生，能把書寫個稍微通俗點嗎？
相關圖書
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息，本站不存儲任何數據與內容，任何內容與數據均與本站無關，如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美書屋 版权所有