Rescuing History from the Nation pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2025
Prasenjit Duara is chair of the department of history at the University of chicago. He is the author of Culture, Power, and the State: Rural North China, 1900-1942 and Sovereignty and Authentcity: Manchukuo and the East Asian Modern.
- 历史
- 杜赞奇
- 民族主义
- 海外中国研究
- nationalism
- nation-state
- 海外汉学
- 政治
Prasenjit Duara offers the first systematic account of the relationship between the nation-state, nationalism, and the concept of linear history. Focusing primarily on China and including discussion of India, Duara argues that many historians of postcolonial nation-states have adopted a linear, evolutionary history of the Enlightenment/colonial model. As a result, they have written repressive, exclusionary, and incomplete accounts.
The backlash against such histories has resulted in a tendency to view the past as largely constructed, imagined, or invented. In this book, Duara offers a way out of the impasse between constructionism and the evolving nation; he redefines history as a series of multiple, often conflicting narratives produced simultaneously at national, local, and transnational levels. In a series of closely linked case studies, he considers such examples as the very different histories produced by Chinese nationalist reformers and partisans of popular religions, the conflicting narratives of statist nationalists and of advocates of federalism in early twentieth-century China. He demonstrates the necessity of incorporating contestation, appropriation, repression, and the return of the repressed subject into any account of the past that will be meaningful to the present. Duara demonstrates how to write histories that resist being pressed into the service of the national subject in its progress—or stalled progress—toward modernity.
具体描述
读后感
分享提纲： 1.近现代中国的救亡图强与国家政治话语的变迁：落后就要挨打——洋务运动——维新变法——反满革命——现代民族国家——之于工具理性的民主——联省自治——中央集权的大一统国家 2.对安德森《想象的共同体》一书的结论反思：中国历史与现实语境下的民族主义——...
评分杜赞奇的杰作《从民族国家拯救历史》的前三章和后三章的画风其实不太一样。第七章与结论甚至有跑偏之嫌，事实上倒是吐露了作者著书的真实意图。全书最费解的是第五章和第六章，其实第四章如果没有中国秘密结社与革命政党在中国近代史中的相关学术训练背景，也很费解。 杜赞奇的...
评分当我们在评价杜赞奇的《从民族国家拯救历史》之前必须首先正视这样一个问题，这本著作虽然在所谓“复线历史观”的提出上表现出了独创性，但在实际的论点论述中却大都承袭了前人。 这个前人，指的是已故日本汉学家沟口雄三80年代所著的《作为方法的中国》（但悲情的是，本书的...
评分杜赞奇的杰作《从民族国家拯救历史》的前三章和后三章的画风其实不太一样。第七章与结论甚至有跑偏之嫌，事实上倒是吐露了作者著书的真实意图。全书最费解的是第五章和第六章，其实第四章如果没有中国秘密结社与革命政党在中国近代史中的相关学术训练背景，也很费解。 杜赞奇的...
评分杜赞奇的杰作《从民族国家拯救历史》的前三章和后三章的画风其实不太一样。第七章与结论甚至有跑偏之嫌，事实上倒是吐露了作者著书的真实意图。全书最费解的是第五章和第六章，其实第四章如果没有中国秘密结社与革命政党在中国近代史中的相关学术训练背景，也很费解。 杜赞奇的...
用户评价
浏览了一下，并未读完。下次要重温
评分第一部分理论篇蛮好的，后面总感觉怪怪的
评分浏览了一下，并未读完。下次要重温
评分一本以后得进书单的书。Part 1启发非常大，Part 2碰的都是大问题。【M: 20 Modernity--History (Mode)--Nation-State (Subject/Agency)】
评分高山仰止。
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有