圖書標籤: Latour 社會學 人類學 STS Science 科學 Anthropology 社會學|人類學
发表于2025-01-27
Science in Action pdf epub mobi txt 電子書 下載 2025
Science and technology have immense authority and influence in our society, yet their working remains little understood. The conventional perception of science in Western societies has been modified in recent years by the work of philosophers, sociologists and historians of science. In this book Bruno Latour brings together these different approaches to provide a lively and challenging analysis of science, demonstrating how social context and technical content are both essential to a proper understanding of scientific activity. Emphasizing that science can only be understood through its practice, the author examines science and technology in action: the role of scientific literature, the activities of laboratories, the institutional context of science in the modern world, and the means by which inventions and discoveries become accepted. From the study of scientific practice he develops an analysis of science as the building of networks. Throughout, Bruno Latour shows how a lively and realistic picture of science in action alters our conception of not only the natural sciences but also the social sciences and the sociology of knowledge in general. This stimulating book, drawing on a wealth of examples from a wide range of scientific activities, will interest all philosophers, sociologists and historians of science, scientists and engineers, and students of the philosophy of social science and the sociology of knowledge.
比we have never been modern好讀也有意思多瞭!
評分A neo-liberal man’s drive to maximize interests is at the heart of this narrow, fragile network. (Per Nadia’s seminar on 2/20/2020)
評分cool
評分特彆喜歡Latour這種刨根究底的研究風格。我個人覺得Actor Network theory可適用性真的挺強的,尤其適用少數人如何讓多數人買賬的場景,非常馬基雅維利. 核心是所謂專傢的科學研究和日常常識,其實差彆在於能夠用來捍衛主張的資源的多少,科學傢能夠調用比普通人更大的網絡來捍衛主張,而科學的延展也在於網絡的延展而不是所謂主張自身也有多少科學性。這麼一想來,在社會科學裏,詮釋占劣勢也是可以理解瞭,畢竟能調動的隻是研究者一張嘴,甚至連訪談都調動不瞭,因為研究者聲稱能瞭解更深的結構,而結構是什麼研究者也爭吵不休。意外之喜是看見L承認社會中的穩定,認為社會中的穩定在於官僚機構,並把它歸結為administrative science,感覺可以藉機發揮一下
評分A neo-liberal man’s drive to maximize interests is at the heart of this narrow, fragile network. (Per Nadia’s seminar on 2/20/2020)
一本对“科学超脱性”(detachment of science)进行祛魅的书:1、技术性论文(technical papers)中潜藏的修辞术“使异议者感到孤独”,参考文献的层积化特性使试图反驳的读者仿佛感觉自己面对的是一些成群而来的天才从而羞赧地闭上了嘴。2、实验室中的小九九更不必多说了。3...
評分一本对“科学超脱性”(detachment of science)进行祛魅的书:1、技术性论文(technical papers)中潜藏的修辞术“使异议者感到孤独”,参考文献的层积化特性使试图反驳的读者仿佛感觉自己面对的是一些成群而来的天才从而羞赧地闭上了嘴。2、实验室中的小九九更不必多说了。3...
評分一本对“科学超脱性”(detachment of science)进行祛魅的书:1、技术性论文(technical papers)中潜藏的修辞术“使异议者感到孤独”,参考文献的层积化特性使试图反驳的读者仿佛感觉自己面对的是一些成群而来的天才从而羞赧地闭上了嘴。2、实验室中的小九九更不必多说了。3...
評分一本对“科学超脱性”(detachment of science)进行祛魅的书:1、技术性论文(technical papers)中潜藏的修辞术“使异议者感到孤独”,参考文献的层积化特性使试图反驳的读者仿佛感觉自己面对的是一些成群而来的天才从而羞赧地闭上了嘴。2、实验室中的小九九更不必多说了。3...
評分一本对“科学超脱性”(detachment of science)进行祛魅的书:1、技术性论文(technical papers)中潜藏的修辞术“使异议者感到孤独”,参考文献的层积化特性使试图反驳的读者仿佛感觉自己面对的是一些成群而来的天才从而羞赧地闭上了嘴。2、实验室中的小九九更不必多说了。3...
Science in Action pdf epub mobi txt 電子書 下載 2025