Arturo Escobar is the Kenan Distinguished Professor of Anthropology at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. His most recent book is Territories of Difference.
How did the industrialized nations of North America and Europe come to be seen as the appropriate models for post-World War II societies in Asia, Africa, and Latin America? How did the postwar discourse on development actually create the so-called Third World? And what will happen when development ideology collapses? To answer these questions, Arturo Escobar shows how development policies became mechanisms of control that were just as pervasive and effective as their colonial counterparts. The development apparatus generated categories powerful enough to shape the thinking even of its occasional critics while poverty and hunger became widespread. 'Development' was not even partially 'deconstructed' until the 1980s, when new tools for analyzing the representation of social reality were applied to specific 'Third World' cases. Here Escobar deploys these new techniques in a provocative analysis of development discourse and practice in general, concluding with a discussion of alternative visions for a postdevelopment era. Escobar emphasizes the role of economists in development discourse - his case study of Colombia demonstrates that the economization of food resulted in ambitious plans, and more hunger. To depict the production of knowledge and power in other development fields, the author shows how peasants, women, and nature became objects of knowledge and targets of power under the 'gaze of experts'.
Escobar's book is indeed influential in the development discipline. The greatest value of this piece is its reflective ontological inquiry. Instead of taking the conceptual family of development as given, Escobar argues that "development" is actually a disc...
评分Escobar's book is indeed influential in the development discipline. The greatest value of this piece is its reflective ontological inquiry. Instead of taking the conceptual family of development as given, Escobar argues that "development" is actually a disc...
评分Escobar's book is indeed influential in the development discipline. The greatest value of this piece is its reflective ontological inquiry. Instead of taking the conceptual family of development as given, Escobar argues that "development" is actually a disc...
评分Escobar's book is indeed influential in the development discipline. The greatest value of this piece is its reflective ontological inquiry. Instead of taking the conceptual family of development as given, Escobar argues that "development" is actually a disc...
评分Escobar's book is indeed influential in the development discipline. The greatest value of this piece is its reflective ontological inquiry. Instead of taking the conceptual family of development as given, Escobar argues that "development" is actually a disc...
一剂良药
评分Foucault... always Foucault....
评分Foucault... always Foucault....
评分从反贫困、发展经济学, 到IRD, WID, 可持续发展...用福柯式的话语分析几乎把俺本科学过的那些奉为神话的经济理全部论骂了一遍...真是打脸啊
评分从反贫困、发展经济学, 到IRD, WID, 可持续发展...用福柯式的话语分析几乎把俺本科学过的那些奉为神话的经济理全部论骂了一遍...真是打脸啊
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有