Empire at the Margins

Empire at the Margins pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2025

出版者:University of California Press
作者:Pamela Kyle Crossley
出品人:
页数:378
译者:
出版时间:2006-1-19
价格:USD 68.95
装帧:Hardcover
isbn号码:9780520230156
丛书系列:Studies on China (UC Press)
图书标签:
  • 海外中国研究
  • 历史
  • 边疆史
  • 萧凤霞
  • 新清史
  • 清史
  • 柯娇燕
  • 美国汉学
  • 帝国
  • 边缘
  • 历史
  • 地理
  • 文化
  • 权力
  • 边界
  • 多元
  • 身份
  • 变迁
想要找书就要到 小美书屋
立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本页
你会得到大惊喜!!

具体描述

Focusing on the Ming (1368-1644) and (especially) the Qing (1364-1912) eras, this book analyzes crucial moments in the formation of cultural, regional, and religious identities. The contributors examine the role of the state in a variety of environments on China's "peripheries," paying attention to shifts in law, trade, social stratification, and cultural dialogue. They find that local communities were critical participants in the shaping of their own identities and consciousness as well as the character and behavior of the state. At certain times the state was institutionally definitive, but it could also be symbolic and contingent. They demonstrate how the imperial discourse is many-faceted, rather than a monolithic agent of cultural assimilation.

作者简介

Pamela Kyle Crossley is Professor of History at Dartmouth College. Helen Siu is Professor of Anthropology at Yale University. Donald Sutton is Professor of History and Anthropology at Carnegie Mellon University.

目录信息

Acknowledgments
Notes to Readers
Introduction
I. Identity at the Heart of Empire
1. Ethnicity in the Qing Eight Banners
Mark C. Elliott
2. Making Mongols
Pamela Kyle Crossley
3. “A Fierce and Brutal People”: On Islam and Muslims in Qing Law
Jonathan N. Lipman
II. Narrative Wars at the New Frontiers
4. The Qing and Islam on the Western Frontier
James A. Millward and Laura J. Newby
5. The Cant of Conquest: Tusi Offices and China’s Political Incorporation of the Southwest Frontier
John E. Herman
III. Old Contests of the South and Southwest
6. The Yao Wars in the Mid-Ming and their Impact on Yao Ethnicity
David Faure
7. Ethnicity and the Miao Frontier in the Eighteenth Century
Donald S. Sutton
8. Ethnicity, Conflict, and the State in the Early to Mid-Qing: The Hainan Highlands, 1644–1800
Anne Csete
IV. Uncharted Boundaries
9. Ethnic Labels in a Mountainous Region: The Case of She “Bandits”
Wing-hoi Chan
10. Lineage, Market, Pirate, and Dan: Ethnicity in the Pearl River Delta of South China
Helen F. Siu and Liu Zhiwei
Conclusion
Notes on Contributors
Bibliography
Glossary of Characters
Index
· · · · · · (收起)

读后感

评分

Regarding the issue of frontier and ethnicity, the volume edited by Crossley et al. makes significant contributions. Probably out of the hand of Crossley, the introduction to this volume maintains the ambiguity of that in The Translucent Mirror. Apart from ...

评分

Regarding the issue of frontier and ethnicity, the volume edited by Crossley et al. makes significant contributions. Probably out of the hand of Crossley, the introduction to this volume maintains the ambiguity of that in The Translucent Mirror. Apart from ...

评分

Regarding the issue of frontier and ethnicity, the volume edited by Crossley et al. makes significant contributions. Probably out of the hand of Crossley, the introduction to this volume maintains the ambiguity of that in The Translucent Mirror. Apart from ...

评分

Regarding the issue of frontier and ethnicity, the volume edited by Crossley et al. makes significant contributions. Probably out of the hand of Crossley, the introduction to this volume maintains the ambiguity of that in The Translucent Mirror. Apart from ...

评分

Regarding the issue of frontier and ethnicity, the volume edited by Crossley et al. makes significant contributions. Probably out of the hand of Crossley, the introduction to this volume maintains the ambiguity of that in The Translucent Mirror. Apart from ...

用户评价

评分

新清史快速纵览

评分

有几章很有趣,比如lipman关于Sino-Muslim的。后面西南地区的几章略水。主要都是focus在清朝早期,所以论点难免有点片面。

评分

intro conclusion

评分

一切国家建构史都可以成为征服史,自古以来是一家的花可能都是野花!

评分

现在回头来看 这本书最大的意义(和尴尬)可能就在于它公开反映了Elliott和Crossley在ethnicity这个概念上的分歧 Elliott的第一篇和Corssley的第二篇采用了完全不同的概念 前者认为manchu ethnicity在清代前期就存在 经过18世纪清廷对banner的重整而彻底固定 后者认为ethnicity(在序言里也强调了)本身就带有边缘性这些内涵 因此满汉蒙这些在19世纪末之前统统不能算是ethnic 往大了说 Criossley强调清朝是universalism 而Elliott更强调所谓满洲和内亚 其实Crossley本应该和中国学者的观点更相似 但是目前来看她好像为新清史背的锅更多。。。

本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度google,bing,sogou

© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有