Empire at the Margins pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2025
- 海外中国研究
- 历史
- 边疆史
- 萧凤霞
- 新清史
- 清史
- 柯娇燕
- 美国汉学
- 帝国
- 边缘
- 历史
- 地理
- 文化
- 权力
- 边界
- 多元
- 身份
- 变迁
具体描述
Focusing on the Ming (1368-1644) and (especially) the Qing (1364-1912) eras, this book analyzes crucial moments in the formation of cultural, regional, and religious identities. The contributors examine the role of the state in a variety of environments on China's "peripheries," paying attention to shifts in law, trade, social stratification, and cultural dialogue. They find that local communities were critical participants in the shaping of their own identities and consciousness as well as the character and behavior of the state. At certain times the state was institutionally definitive, but it could also be symbolic and contingent. They demonstrate how the imperial discourse is many-faceted, rather than a monolithic agent of cultural assimilation.
作者简介
Pamela Kyle Crossley is Professor of History at Dartmouth College. Helen Siu is Professor of Anthropology at Yale University. Donald Sutton is Professor of History and Anthropology at Carnegie Mellon University.
目录信息
Notes to Readers
Introduction
I. Identity at the Heart of Empire
1. Ethnicity in the Qing Eight Banners
Mark C. Elliott
2. Making Mongols
Pamela Kyle Crossley
3. “A Fierce and Brutal People”: On Islam and Muslims in Qing Law
Jonathan N. Lipman
II. Narrative Wars at the New Frontiers
4. The Qing and Islam on the Western Frontier
James A. Millward and Laura J. Newby
5. The Cant of Conquest: Tusi Offices and China’s Political Incorporation of the Southwest Frontier
John E. Herman
III. Old Contests of the South and Southwest
6. The Yao Wars in the Mid-Ming and their Impact on Yao Ethnicity
David Faure
7. Ethnicity and the Miao Frontier in the Eighteenth Century
Donald S. Sutton
8. Ethnicity, Conflict, and the State in the Early to Mid-Qing: The Hainan Highlands, 1644–1800
Anne Csete
IV. Uncharted Boundaries
9. Ethnic Labels in a Mountainous Region: The Case of She “Bandits”
Wing-hoi Chan
10. Lineage, Market, Pirate, and Dan: Ethnicity in the Pearl River Delta of South China
Helen F. Siu and Liu Zhiwei
Conclusion
Notes on Contributors
Bibliography
Glossary of Characters
Index
· · · · · · (收起)
读后感
Regarding the issue of frontier and ethnicity, the volume edited by Crossley et al. makes significant contributions. Probably out of the hand of Crossley, the introduction to this volume maintains the ambiguity of that in The Translucent Mirror. Apart from ...
评分Regarding the issue of frontier and ethnicity, the volume edited by Crossley et al. makes significant contributions. Probably out of the hand of Crossley, the introduction to this volume maintains the ambiguity of that in The Translucent Mirror. Apart from ...
评分Regarding the issue of frontier and ethnicity, the volume edited by Crossley et al. makes significant contributions. Probably out of the hand of Crossley, the introduction to this volume maintains the ambiguity of that in The Translucent Mirror. Apart from ...
评分Regarding the issue of frontier and ethnicity, the volume edited by Crossley et al. makes significant contributions. Probably out of the hand of Crossley, the introduction to this volume maintains the ambiguity of that in The Translucent Mirror. Apart from ...
评分Regarding the issue of frontier and ethnicity, the volume edited by Crossley et al. makes significant contributions. Probably out of the hand of Crossley, the introduction to this volume maintains the ambiguity of that in The Translucent Mirror. Apart from ...
用户评价
一切国家建构史都可以成为征服史，自古以来是一家的花可能都是野花！
评分读了米华健那章
评分本书核心问题似是由primordialism/constructivism之争引出，然后将这个问题延伸到清史领域，用欧立德的话说，如果民族认同是一种文化构建，那么这个构建并不一定只能建立在现代工业的基础上，这个政治过程在帝国体系里是怎么进行的？本书多强调国家自上而下的民族划分/构建。八旗作为身份认同的制度载体，使得满汉即使在本身性质已经和清初完全不同之后仍然保留着特殊的认同；蒙古的身份构建则强调清/东蒙与西蒙之间的冲突过程，以及黄金家族作为构建核心的象征地位；清廷对汉回的模糊态度关系到其身份的语义混乱；西疆则不同，是“有中国特色的帝国主义”，indirect rule在此体现最为明显，因此在20世纪前突厥并没有统一的民族认同。当然前工业时代民族认同是精英阶层的，但作为现代民族的基础未尝不可？
评分本书核心问题似是由primordialism/constructivism之争引出，然后将这个问题延伸到清史领域，用欧立德的话说，如果民族认同是一种文化构建，那么这个构建并不一定只能建立在现代工业的基础上，这个政治过程在帝国体系里是怎么进行的？本书多强调国家自上而下的民族划分/构建。八旗作为身份认同的制度载体，使得满汉即使在本身性质已经和清初完全不同之后仍然保留着特殊的认同；蒙古的身份构建则强调清/东蒙与西蒙之间的冲突过程，以及黄金家族作为构建核心的象征地位；清廷对汉回的模糊态度关系到其身份的语义混乱；西疆则不同，是“有中国特色的帝国主义”，indirect rule在此体现最为明显，因此在20世纪前突厥并没有统一的民族认同。当然前工业时代民族认同是精英阶层的，但作为现代民族的基础未尝不可？
评分现在回头来看 这本书最大的意义（和尴尬）可能就在于它公开反映了Elliott和Crossley在ethnicity这个概念上的分歧 Elliott的第一篇和Corssley的第二篇采用了完全不同的概念 前者认为manchu ethnicity在清代前期就存在 经过18世纪清廷对banner的重整而彻底固定 后者认为ethnicity（在序言里也强调了）本身就带有边缘性这些内涵 因此满汉蒙这些在19世纪末之前统统不能算是ethnic 往大了说 Criossley强调清朝是universalism 而Elliott更强调所谓满洲和内亚 其实Crossley本应该和中国学者的观点更相似 但是目前来看她好像为新清史背的锅更多。。。
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有