伯特蘭·羅素(Bertrand Russell,1872-1970),20世紀聲譽卓著、影響深遠的偉大思想傢,分析哲學創始人和主要代錶。主要著作:《我們關於外間世界的知識》(1913)、《數學原理》(1910-1913)、《哲學問題》(1912)、《心的分析》(1921)、《西方哲學史》(1945)、《邏輯和知識》(1956)、《我的哲學發展》(1959)。
Bertrand Russell was one of the greatest logicians since Aristotle, and one of the most important philosophers of the past two hundred years. As we approach the 125th anniversary of the Nobel laureate's birth, his works continue to spark debate, resounding with unmatched timeliness and power.
The Problems of Philosophy, one of the most popular works in Russell's prolific collection of writings, has become core reading in philosophy. Clear and accessible, this little book is an intelligible and stimulating guide to those problems of philosophy which often mistakenly lead to its status
as too lofty and abstruse for the lay mind. Focusing on problems he believes will provoke positive and constructive discussion, Russell concentrates on knowledge rather than metaphysics, steering the reader through his famous 1910 distinction between "knowledge by acquaintance and knowledge by
description," and introducing important theories of Descartes, Kant, Hegel, Hume, Locke, Plato, and others to lay the foundation for philosophical inquiry by general readers and scholars alike.
With a new introduction by John Perry, this valuable work is a perfect introduction to the field and will continue to stimulate philosophical discussion as it has done for nearly forty years.
本书前半段的主题:一张桌子是否存在,它又是如何被感知的。 桌子摆在眼前。它的颜色是不同频率的光反射的不同结果,它的质感是身体的不同部位触碰的不同结果,它的温度、形状无不与人的位置、状态有关。而如果让一群人去画这张桌子,去描述它,这些感受到的差别又会消...
評分有人说《哲学问题》要从后往前读。单看最后一章,这说法绝对没错。十五章----《哲学的价值》 哲学不得出确切的知识,它提出最原始的疑问,用合乎逻辑的假想和思考再提出解决之道。然,问题被解决就得出了确切的知识,那部分便会脱离哲学原体成为各种学科:从上...
評分今日读罢《哲学问题》。 此书今年二月份由路阳介绍给我。七月份开始读,至今才读完,距二月份已去半年,惭愧。 读速较快,本以不求甚解的态度,不少处其实读地并不清晰。 感觉材料一处的论证实是动人。 归纳法一处与《科学哲学》一书恰有印证,罗素以概率为解答倒也有趣。 一个...
評分 評分深刻的哲學入門;不僅通過知識論排列瞭西方哲學中的重要思想,更有作者自己對這些觀點的批駁,使讀者感到哲學傢是如何思考的。
评分【2014.09.20?- 2014.11.02】基本上是一本廁所讀物!但這並不妨礙我學到,或者說至少開始思考,不少東西。迴想起來大概是2003年9月底在新校圖書館讀中文版卻不瞭瞭之,十一年後完成瞭這件事,也是值得慶祝吧。內容太多,需要再讀。最後一章論及哲學的價值寫得非常精彩,基本可以單獨拿齣來作爲Essay記誦。
评分厲害瞭…
评分寫的有點太簡化瞭 不嚴謹 用詞不如Hobbes 講真我覺得intro寫的最好
评分我要退坑!快拉我齣來!我為什麼要讀這本書!
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美書屋 版权所有