During the late imperial era (1500-1911), China, though divided by ethnic, linguistic, and regional differences at least as great as those prevailing in Europe, enjoyed a remarkable solidarity. What held Chinese society together for so many centuries? Some scholars have pointed to the institutional control over the written word as instrumental in promoting cultural homogenization; others, the manipulation of the performing arts. This volume, comprised of essays by both anthropologists and historians, furthers this important discussion by examining the role of death rituals in the unification of Chinese culture.
James L. Watson is Professor of Anthropology at Harvard University.
Evelyn S. Rawski is Professor of History at the University of Pittsburgh.
评分
评分
评分
评分
中国丧葬仪式研究classic,地域覆盖面较局限,不少篇目理论框架过时,依然inspiring
评分带着猎奇的视角无端深化一个寻常的事件,那是记叙文
评分必备文献。 细读了一遍,内容比想象的少,论证比想象的粗糙。十二篇中,倒有三篇在拿性别说事儿,两篇和政治搅在了一起。 第一部分的两篇很关键,虽则一些论述已经过时,但是人类学和历史学的视角都值得借鉴。孔迈隆的Souls and Salvation最细致,且贴地。 #终于看完了晚上不用怎么做噩梦了
评分清明前看完也算应景,导论两章引用最多,食物那章也不错,最感兴趣是最后一章殡仪改革,不过小失望。大部分章节看起来应该很有趣,不过变成了材料梳理,例如毛的遗体处理、仪式专家那两章。让我惊讶的是材料我都好陌生,变迁太快了……
评分Some ideas are quite outdated. But how we should interpret rituals is an eternal topic. And there are some interesting explanations about food and gender in Chinese funeral rituals.
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有