具体描述
How do we explain the surprising trajectory of the Chinese Communist revolution? Why has it taken such a different route from its Russian prototype? An answer, Elizabeth Perry suggests, lies in the Chinese Communists' creative development and deployment of cultural resources - during their revolutionary rise to power and afterwards. Skillful "cultural positioning" and "cultural patronage," on the part of Mao Zedong, his comrades and successors, helped to construct a polity in which a once alien Communist system came to be accepted as familiarly "Chinese." Perry traces this process through a case study of the Anyuan coal mine, a place where Mao and other early leaders of the Chinese Communist Party mobilized an influential labor movement at the beginning of their revolution, and whose history later became a touchstone of "political correctness" in the People's Republic of China. Once known as "China's Little Moscow," Anyuan came over time to symbolize a distinctively Chinese revolutionary tradition. Yet the meanings of that tradition remain highly contested, as contemporary Chinese debate their revolutionary past in search of a new political future.
作者简介
Elizabeth Perry is Henry Rosovsky Professor of Government at Harvard University and Director of the Harvard-Yenching Institute. She is the author of many books, most recently: Mao's Invisible Hand: The Political Foundations of Adaptive Governance in China and Patrolling the Revolution: Worker Militias, Citizenship and the Modern Chinese State.
目录信息
读后感
这是一本典型的问题主导的研究。裴老师的问题就是“为什么中共当年能够扇乎那么多人死心塌地的闹革命。” 先生从文化入手，基本论断是culture/ideology localization。 但是无意之中，还有另一层恐怕也更加重要。李立三能把工人俱乐部搞起来，刘少奇能接着把它变成小莫斯科，核...
评分题目的意思是指李立三最初利用当地习俗传播革命的观念，到八十多年后，革命成了当地的文化传统。不深究，可自行体会。 谈读书的大致感受。 有许多不了解的新知识。李立三与安源是我之前从未听说过的。可能也从侧面说明，经济化的大趋势导致凭借政治性而闻名的安源某种程度上已...
评分这是一本典型的问题主导的研究。裴老师的问题就是“为什么中共当年能够扇乎那么多人死心塌地的闹革命。” 先生从文化入手，基本论断是culture/ideology localization。 但是无意之中，还有另一层恐怕也更加重要。李立三能把工人俱乐部搞起来，刘少奇能接着把它变成小莫斯科，核...
评分这是一本典型的问题主导的研究。裴老师的问题就是“为什么中共当年能够扇乎那么多人死心塌地的闹革命。” 先生从文化入手，基本论断是culture/ideology localization。 但是无意之中，还有另一层恐怕也更加重要。李立三能把工人俱乐部搞起来，刘少奇能接着把它变成小莫斯科，核...
评分- 初碰到這本書時, 差不多被它的封面與設計差嚇跑了。港大出版社的書, 講真應該做好一點設計. 牛津比它好很多, 中大近年也不錯. - 回到這本書的話, 我覺得非常好看. 由於對國內學術圈不熟悉, 在找關於近代中國史的書本時我總是不大敢找內地出版的書籍, 不知道哪些題目內地是可...
用户评价
工人、共产党、红帮、儒家精英、现代企业家、基督教会，如此复杂多面的工厂生态由“cultural positioning”和“cultural patronage”两条线索贯穿始终。史料扎实，很开眼界。
评分裴宜理教授作品中最喜欢的一部，csc面试时被问到如何理解ccp在中国的成功，就照这个路子回答的。
评分以安源为线索，基于对安源“革命传统”的建构与叙述，梳理出cultural positioning和cultural patronage两条思路——在cultural positioning中借用宗教、仪式等符号资源获取普通人对革命authority的接纳，在cultural patronage的宣传中“塑造”符合政治需要的革命传统。安源工人在罢工、纪念日、音乐、“化妆讲演”中走向革命，走向mobilization，“made crucial contributions in both military and political terms”，最后不过是给新政体提供reconstruct革命传统的素材罢了。
评分Replete with historical fun facts, but not particularly interests me due to its focus on political leadership itself. Successfully answered the question: why do they worship Mao in contemporary China.
评分读了，忘了...
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有