Before and Beyond Divergence pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2025
Jean-Laurent Rosenthal is the Rea A. and Lela G. Axline Professor of Business Economics at the California Institute of Technology.
R. Bin Wong is Professor of History and Director of the Asia Institute at the University of California, Los Angeles.
- 经济史
- 海外中国研究
- 历史
- Bin.Wong
- Economics
- 欧洲
- 王国斌
- history
China has reemerged as a powerhouse in the global economy, reviving a classic question in economic history: why did sustained economic growth arise in Europe rather than in China?
Many favor cultural and environmental explanations of the nineteenth-century economic divergence between Europe and the rest of the world. This book, the product of over twenty years of research, takes a sharply different tack. It argues that political differences which crystallized well before 1800 were responsible both for China’s early and more recent prosperity and for Europe’s difficulties after the fall of the Roman Empire and during early industrialization.
Rosenthal and Wong show that relative prices matter to how economies evolve; institutions can have a large effect on relative prices; and the spatial scale of polities can affect the choices of institutions in the long run. Their historical perspective on institutional change has surprising implications for understanding modern transformations in China and Europe and for future expectations. It also yields insights in comparative economic history, essential to any larger social science account of modern world history.
具体描述
读后感
美国“加州学派”历史学者彭慕兰（Kenneth Pomeranz）的《大分流》曾高调进入中国。2004年，大陆和台湾同时出版了中译本（两岸译者都以经济史为其主要研究领域，简体版是史建云，繁体版是邱澎生）。《大分流》使“大分流”成为学术界和读书圈的流行词，也再度引起对“中国何以...
评分困死了……逻辑难免不清……明天醒过来慢慢改…… ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 已经放了两年，中间翻过几页。这次因为要present，三天读完——顺便解放出了一个美貌的书签，当时购于中央美院的乌菲齐博物馆画展。 读之前我心里其实是有点唧唧歪歪...
评分美国“加州学派”历史学者彭慕兰（Kenneth Pomeranz）的《大分流》曾高调进入中国。2004年，大陆和台湾同时出版了中译本（两岸译者都以经济史为其主要研究领域，简体版是史建云，繁体版是邱澎生）。《大分流》使“大分流”成为学术界和读书圈的流行词，也再度引起对“中国何以...
评分本文欲达成三个相关目标：首先，介绍“加州学派”学者们的中心论点;其次，围绕彭慕兰(Kenneth Pomeranz)所撰写的加州学派的扛鼎之作，对加州学派作出批判性的评价;最后，就“为何工业资本主义发生于欧洲而非中国”这一大多数加州学派学者所关心的中心议题提供一个不同的解释。...
评分had the honor of meeting with the two authors today, so it occurred to me that I should write a review for this book. if you look at the literature, the cooperation between economics and history is way less successful than I once thought.To quote this book...
用户评价
模型混乱。
评分逻辑诡异但又完美。。。有些论点论据不足，该模型很多地方还是不适用。
评分Again the fit theory, also the target of Vries' 2015 book.
评分去年五月在皮凯蒂的主页找到的英文版，很有趣的交集。和《通往工业革命的漫长道路》一起读的，有点相互补充的感觉。观点不新，部分地方缺乏材料支撑，但论证逻辑的推演很仔细。这本书一度成了我的文献索引，按照每章的参考文献找文章读。
评分可读性还挺强的，不过大概也可以归纳到“中西对比”一类的套路里？结论就是要“放宽历史的视野”：大分流始于更早的历史时期的设定（尤其是政治层面的差异），而不是显见的19世纪。
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有