Why does the West rule? In this magnum opus, eminent Stanford polymath Ian Morris answers this provocative question, drawing on 50,000 years of history, archeology, and the methods of social science, to make sense of when, how, and why the paths of development differed in the East and West — and what this portends for the 21st century.
There are two broad schools of thought on why the West rules. Proponents of "Long-Term Lock-In" theories such as Jared Diamond suggest that from time immemorial, some critical factor— geography, climate, or culture perhaps — made East and West unalterably different, and determined that the industrial revolution would happen in the West and push it further ahead of the East. But the East led the West between 500 and 1600, so this development can't have been inevitable; and so proponents of "Short-Term Accident" theories argue that Western rule was a temporary aberration that is now coming to an end, with Japan, China, and India resuming their rightful places on the world stage. However, as the West led for 9,000 of the previous 10,000 years, it wasn't just a temporary aberration. So, if we want to know why the West rules, we need a whole new theory. Ian Morris, boldly entering the turf of Jared Diamond and Niall Ferguson, provides the broader approach that is necessary, combining the textual historian's focus on context, the anthropological archaeologist's awareness of the deep past, and the social scientist's comparative methods to make sense of the past, present, and future— in a way no one has ever done before.
The Economists 2010年度推荐,FT中文网年度荐书,2011年奥威尔写作奖提名
伊恩·莫里斯是斯坦福大学的历史学和古典文学教授。目前,他已出版十部学术性著作,包括最近的《远古帝国的兴衰》。同时,他还指导了希腊和意大利的考古挖掘。他现在居住在加利福尼亚州的圣克鲁斯山。
1.假装公正客观,自编了一套毫无科学性的所谓评分体系。 2.偷换概念。好家伙,从埃及、巴比伦到波斯,他把地球上几乎所有的辉煌文明都纳入西方范畴,只为在与东方中国的评分中获得几乎全胜的战绩。又是一个中国pk全世界的故事。 3.掩耳盗铃。可惜与中华文明比拼强大的生命力,...
评分《西方将主宰多久(Why the West rule-for now)》读后感 这是本很有趣的书,尽管其学术思想并不怎么专业,但在历史比较领域,也算是一枝奇葩。我从3月25日开始读这本书,到3月30日完成全书的3/4,中间因为陪大哥游玩及随之而来的清明假期而基本没有看,到今天一口气看完了,也...
评分在《西方将主宰多久》一书中,斯坦福大学教授伊恩•莫里斯运用贾雷德•戴蒙德在《枪炮,病菌与钢铁》用的类似的生物学和社会学方法来解答斯宾格勒提出的问题,西方为什么会没落,东方为什么开始超越西方。他得出的结论和戴蒙德的结论类似,都是地理因素最重要。 伊恩•莫...
评分历史总能给人以展望未来的启示。然而不同的人看到不同的历史,由之而来的启示也各自不同。说实话,如果你想从历史中找到某些规律和教训来支持你对未来的规划,你几乎总能找到的。 西风压倒东风 成功者如果不清楚自己是怎么成功的,那他将很难复制这一成功;而失败者如果不清楚...
穿越上万年的历史来总结人类的发展规律
评分其实你的思考早已被人汇编成书/ 听西方人讲中国历史总是有趣
评分宏大视野,从人类的角度思考问题。
评分历史学家想用数据说话,他自己的指数(energy, organization, information, war)的heuristic 本身就有问题,而且测量标准不一,也都瞎估计,自己还承认有10%不超过20%的误差。唯一赞同的一句话是"..societies' abilities to get things done.. is the point of life"
评分这绝对是我这几年读到最有启发的书了。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有