图书标签: 政治学 社会运动 社会学 海外中国研究 威权主义 比较政治 政治社会学 politics
发表于2024-12-23
Mobilizing without the Masses pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2024
When advocacy organizations are forbidden from rallying people to take to the streets, what do they do? When activists are detained for coordinating protests, are their hands ultimately tied? Based on political ethnography inside both legal and blacklisted labor organizations in China, this book reveals how state repression is deployed on the ground and to what effect on mobilization. It presents a novel dynamic of civil society contention - mobilizing without the masses - that lowers the risk of activism under duress. Instead of facilitating collective action, activists coach the aggrieved to challenge authorities one by one. In doing so, they lower the risks of organizing while empowering the weak. This dynamic represents a third pathway of contention that challenges conventional understandings of mobilization in an illiberal state. It takes readers inside the world of underground labor organizing and opens the black box of repression inside the world's most powerful authoritarian state.
Diana Fu is Assistant Professor of Asian Politics at the University of Toronto. This book builds upon her dissertation research at the University of Oxford where she studied as a Rhodes Scholar. Previously, she was a Walter H. Shorenstein Postdoctoral Fellow at Stanford University, California and a pre-doctoral fellow at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Her research has been supported by the Harold Hyam Wingate Foundation, the Chiang Ching Kuo Foundation, and the Rhodes Trust. Her academic articles have been published in Comparative Political Studies, Governance, and Modern China, among others. Her writing and research have appeared in The Economist, Foreign Affairs, The Washington Post, The Boston Review, PostGlobal, and Nicholas Kristof's 'On the Ground' Blog for The New York Times.
太稚嫩、格局太小了,除在中层加入介于组织与个体间的“无大众动员”外没有理论深度,大概看到倘若我本科直升读博做民族志的后果。上篇笼统地谈了劳工NGO,纵向中央和地方政府、横向不同政府机构对NGO的分散化管控,政府购买社会服务来促使竞争和收编管控。下篇对微观集体行动、个体化有幕后指导的行动、离散性行动三种策略的比较见P91,第一被直接镇压关停,第二采用个体威胁式行为达成诉求相对可行,第三用非暴力合作的文艺手段非常和谐。但是从零星的个体/组织行动到工人集体意识的启蒙到反权威政体意识的觉醒到对民主自由大众动员的乐观,这几步跳的太大了!一边是激进团体地下化去组织化的策略,一边是劳工在组织培训下参与个体抗争,两者完全没有融汇并切入政治+组织社会学理论核心,穿插的四个NGO案例毫无理论比较意义 M
评分本书讨论的问题是,在一个非自由的威权政体下,劳工组织是如何实现动员的(换言之,其动员策略为何)。其经验研究是基于20(out of 72)个中国“非法”劳工组织的近两年的实地调查,里面有一些有趣的细节。在理论上,其动员理论不同于既有的两大主流文献,一是作为集体行动的社会抗争动员;二是作为弱者武器的社会抗争动员。Diana认为她所发现的“Mobilizing without the Masses (MWTM)”模式是介于两者之间的。MWTM不同于大规模集体行动,因为这在拥有强大国家能力的非自由政体会很危险;MWTM同样不同于弱者的武器(尽量不能被当权者察觉,例如摸鱼、消极怠工),而是希望make a scene,从而使自身的问题得到解决。同时,作者还自嘲了英国式政治学博士论文与美国的风格差异。
评分第六章-atomized action原来都是为了达成目的导演好的。有的时候的确需要撒泼,像李敖讲的,缠着他,粘着他,折腾他,让他为我们服务。
评分越看literature越接近自己想要做的研究,是好事还是坏事? 从organization的角度看contention的literature还是比较少的。不过说实话这些practice严格意义上来说算不算mobilization其实不好说。fragmented control和competitive control是两个很好的model,但case study能提供的说辞太浅薄了。没有看到很强烈的competition也没看到各个state actors之间的conflicts。后期的对于organization strategies的描写同样很白描。给我political science的写作风格就是如此的感觉。
评分本书讨论的问题是,在一个非自由的威权政体下,劳工组织是如何实现动员的(换言之,其动员策略为何)。其经验研究是基于20(out of 72)个中国“非法”劳工组织的近两年的实地调查,里面有一些有趣的细节。在理论上,其动员理论不同于既有的两大主流文献,一是作为集体行动的社会抗争动员;二是作为弱者武器的社会抗争动员。Diana认为她所发现的“Mobilizing without the Masses (MWTM)”模式是介于两者之间的。MWTM不同于大规模集体行动,因为这在拥有强大国家能力的非自由政体会很危险;MWTM同样不同于弱者的武器(尽量不能被当权者察觉,例如摸鱼、消极怠工),而是希望make a scene,从而使自身的问题得到解决。同时,作者还自嘲了英国式政治学博士论文与美国的风格差异。
评分
评分
评分
评分
Mobilizing without the Masses pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2024