Nicolas Tackett is Associate Professor of History at the University of California, Berkeley.
The complete disappearance by the tenth century of the medieval Chinese aristocracy, the "great clans" that had dominated China for centuries, has long perplexed historians. In this book, Nicolas Tackett resolves the enigma of their disappearance by using new, digital methodologies to analyze a dazzling array of sources. He systematically exploits the thousands of funerary biographies excavated in recent decades--most of them never before examined by scholars--while taking full advantage of the explanatory power of Geographic Information System (GIS) and social network analysis. Tackett supplements these analyses with an extensive use of anecdotes culled from epitaphs, prose literature, and poetry, bringing to life the women and men of a millennium ago. The Destruction of the Medieval Chinese Aristocracy demonstrates that the great Tang aristocratic families were far more successful than previously believed in adapting to the social, economic, and institutional transformations of the seventh and eighth centuries. Their political influence collapsed only after a large proportion of them were physically eliminated during the three decades of extreme violence that followed Huang Chao's sack of the capital cities in 880 CE.
王黃之亂的社會史意義 ——讀Nicolas Tackett著The Destruction of the Medieval Chinese Aristocracy 胡耀飛 有幸承擔譚凱(Nicolas Tackett)先生大著The Destruction of the Medieval Chinese Aristocracy(Cambridge[Massachusetts] and London: Harvard University Asia...
评分引入大数据分析是本书的吸睛之处,但本书的叙事风格很是无聊,多翻上几页就催人入睡。史景迁说过:“好的历史学家应该先学会讲好故事。”显然,作者并不是一个会讲好故事的历史学家。不过话说回来,其实不唯作者,现在很多学者的文章差不多都是这么一个风格,读起来大多味同嚼...
评分主线、方法与(我的)脑洞——读《中古中国门阀大族的消亡》 谭凯(Nicolas Tackett)《中古中国门阀大族的消亡》2014年在美国出版,没想到中译本2017年就面世。联想到尽管有周一良先生的书评,但伊沛霞(Patricia Ebrey)讨论博陵崔氏的专著在出版三十余年后才正式引介入国内...
评分虽然数据不具有概括性,但是事实确实是唐宋之际中古世族消失,这一视角为以后晚唐及唐末研究开创了契机……比如中央政策鼓励世族聚集政治中心(从隋唐频繁迁都开始)导致黄巢予以的毁灭打击等等,总的来说,外国学者对于中国历史看得潜,还不错吧。随着关于各种资料的发掘,再...
评分这本书的最大特点是作者的研究方法,作者以出土墓碑为载体,整理制作了大量的图表,以大数据、统计学的方式来还原唐代门阀大族。但在翻译、讲述的切入点和对中国传统的认知上面存在诸多问题,使其有相当多的内容丧失了可读性。我在阅读这本《中古中国门阀大族的消亡》期间,恰...
去年的新书。capital elite论述的非常有启发,作者认为中古士族大家结束于黄巢之乱。
评分我认为作者还是有非常高超的技巧,一个网络分析可能引发无数的批评,但是作者在娴熟的学术自澄中限定好了研究目的与研究问题,我觉得这就够了。虽然大小结论上稍显过时,但是通过量化分析与前人研究的对话还是给人很大的启发。
评分我认为作者还是有非常高超的技巧,一个网络分析可能引发无数的批评,但是作者在娴熟的学术自澄中限定好了研究目的与研究问题,我觉得这就够了。虽然大小结论上稍显过时,但是通过量化分析与前人研究的对话还是给人很大的启发。
评分Huang Chao as the decisive turning point; a sequel on cultural transformation will follow. Not critical enough for tomb epitaph rhetoric.
评分值得學習的是作者的數據分析法和把elite分為capital elites和provincial elites,註意到他們所擁有的資源和社會網是不一樣的。但是討論課時班裏有同學說他的觀點早在之前毛漢光和張國剛的研究就已經提出。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有