The complete disappearance by the tenth century of the medieval Chinese aristocracy, the "great clans" that had dominated China for centuries, has long perplexed historians. In this book, Nicolas Tackett resolves the enigma of their disappearance by using new, digital methodologies to analyze a dazzling array of sources. He systematically exploits the thousands of funerary biographies excavated in recent decades--most of them never before examined by scholars--while taking full advantage of the explanatory power of Geographic Information System (GIS) and social network analysis. Tackett supplements these analyses with an extensive use of anecdotes culled from epitaphs, prose literature, and poetry, bringing to life the women and men of a millennium ago. The Destruction of the Medieval Chinese Aristocracy demonstrates that the great Tang aristocratic families were far more successful than previously believed in adapting to the social, economic, and institutional transformations of the seventh and eighth centuries. Their political influence collapsed only after a large proportion of them were physically eliminated during the three decades of extreme violence that followed Huang Chao's sack of the capital cities in 880 CE.
Nicolas Tackett is Associate Professor of History at the University of California, Berkeley.
引入大数据分析是本书的吸睛之处,但本书的叙事风格很是无聊,多翻上几页就催人入睡。史景迁说过:“好的历史学家应该先学会讲好故事。”显然,作者并不是一个会讲好故事的历史学家。不过话说回来,其实不唯作者,现在很多学者的文章差不多都是这么一个风格,读起来大多味同嚼...
评分 评分诚如作者自己所说,有关中古门阀大族的研究一直是个热点,唐宋变革所带来的社会政治精英的转型究竟在何时发生有些争议。安史之乱一直被视作为唐朝衰落与转折的起点,社会政治精英的改造也被纳入安史之乱的影响之一。 然而谭凯成功的聚焦了一个问题:转变是一个连续性的过程,而...
评分王黃之亂的社會史意義 ——讀Nicolas Tackett著The Destruction of the Medieval Chinese Aristocracy 胡耀飛 有幸承擔譚凱(Nicolas Tackett)先生大著The Destruction of the Medieval Chinese Aristocracy(Cambridge[Massachusetts] and London: Harvard University Asia...
评分虽然数据不具有概括性,但是事实确实是唐宋之际中古世族消失,这一视角为以后晚唐及唐末研究开创了契机……比如中央政策鼓励世族聚集政治中心(从隋唐频繁迁都开始)导致黄巢予以的毁灭打击等等,总的来说,外国学者对于中国历史看得潜,还不错吧。随着关于各种资料的发掘,再...
博论 http://history.berkeley.edu/sites/default/files/slides/Dissertation.pdf
评分值得學習的是作者的數據分析法和把elite分為capital elites和provincial elites,註意到他們所擁有的資源和社會網是不一樣的。但是討論課時班裏有同學說他的觀點早在之前毛漢光和張國剛的研究就已經提出。
评分概括:通过对河北墓志铭一手资料的梳理(计算关键词的百分比、家族亲缘关系、与政府关系)有力地支持了唐宋世变论,并从侧面为择地而居和优生学提供了一定支持。
评分值得學習的是作者的數據分析法和把elite分為capital elites和provincial elites,註意到他們所擁有的資源和社會網是不一樣的。但是討論課時班裏有同學說他的觀點早在之前毛漢光和張國剛的研究就已經提出。
评分博论 http://history.berkeley.edu/sites/default/files/slides/Dissertation.pdf
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有