Origins of the Modern Chinese State pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2025
Philip A. Kuhn is Francis Lee Higginson Professor of History at Harvard University. His most recent book is Soulstealers: The Chinese Sorcery Scare of 1768, winner of the Joseph Levenson Prize of the Association for Asian Studies.
- 孔飞力
- 海外中国研究
- 历史
- 中国
- 思想史
- 中国政治
- 政治学
- History
What is “Chinese” about China’s modern state? This book proposes that the state we see today has developed over the past two centuries largely as a response to internal challenges emerging from the late empire. Well before the Opium War, Chinese confronted such constitutional questions as: How does the scope of political participation affect state power? How is the state to secure a share of society’s wealth? In response to the changing demands of the age, this agenda has been expressed in changing language. Yet, because the underlying pattern remains recognizable, the modernization of the state in response to foreign aggression can be studied in longer perspective.
The author offers three concrete studies to illustrate the constitutional agenda in action: how the early nineteenth-century scholar-activist Wei Yuan confronted the relation between broadened political participation and authoritarian state power; how the reformist proposals of the influential scholar Feng Guifen were received by mainstream bureaucrats during the 1898 reform movement; and how fiscal problems of the late empire formed a backdrop to agricultural collectivization in the 1950s. In each case, the author presents the “modern” constitutional solution as only the most recent answer to old Chinese questions. The book concludes by describing the transformation of the constitutional agenda over the course of the modern period.
具体描述
读后感
从1970年代起，“晚期帝制中国”这个概念逐渐在美国的汉学界（中国学研究领域）流行起来，甚至连美国清史研究会(Society for Qing Studies)主办的《清史问题》(Ch’ing-Shih Wen-T’i)杂志也于1985年6月更名为《晚期帝制中国》（Late Imperial China），更不用说许多明清史著作...
评分从1970年代起，“晚期帝制中国”这个概念逐渐在美国的汉学界（中国学研究领域）流行起来，甚至连美国清史研究会(Society for Qing Studies)主办的《清史问题》(Ch’ing-Shih Wen-T’i)杂志也于1985年6月更名为《晚期帝制中国》（Late Imperial China），更不用说许多明清史著作...
评分 评分读导论，一上来就给中国现代国家的形成的“中国的过程”，“根本性议程”等高深的提法给震慑了。作者政治学术语层出不穷，天马行空，论及“根本性议程”所谓三协调、三难题，让我如堕云雾、雾里看花，似又确有启发，总之笔记记了，觉也睡了。 读了第一章，若有小悟。魏源的身...
评分用户评价
強調從中國內部的脈絡觀察近代史
评分跟史华慈类似，孔飞力对“现代性”和“现代国家”也有特别的关切。但基于对“现代性”之多样化和复杂度的判断，孔氏又保持高度的谨慎，拒绝以任何断言的、非辩证的方式加以定义。在这本书中，他展示了他的替代方案：界定现代国家的三个“根本性议题”，并阐发从中国本身的历史中发现这些议题之演进逻辑的可能。当然这会引来各个方向的批评：孔氏并没有说明决定“何种问题值得发现”的标准，也似乎对49年后的“新传统”缺乏体察。但是，对于试图为研究增加历史厚度、但又并非历史专业的“外行人”，孔氏关于“根本性议程”之连续性的论述极大地扩充了可利用的思想资源、至少是拓展了学术想象的空间。
评分历时四个月终于看完了。然而没有看懂。哪天找中文本看看。
评分頭好疼，要感冒了吧，睡覺去。。。
评分找到了电子版pdf，很赞
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有