The Chomsky-Foucault Debate pdf epub mobi txt 電子書 下載2025
Noam Chomsky is Professor of Linguistics at MIT and a world-renowned political thinker and activist. The author of numerous books, including On Language and Understanding Power (both available from The New Press), he lives in Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Michel Foucault (1926-84) held a chair in the History of Systems of Thought at the Collège de France. The New Press has published three previous volumes of his work as well as a collection, The Essential Foucault.
John Rajchman is a professor of philosophy at Columbia University and author of Michel Foucault. He lives in New York City.
- Chomsky
- Foucault
- 哲學
- 福柯
- 語言學
- 社會理論
- 喬姆斯基
- 思想
Two of the twentieth century's most influential thinkers debate a perennial question.
In 1971, at the height of the Vietnam War and at a time of great political and social instability, two of the world's leading intellectuals, Noam Chomsky and Michel Foucault, were invited by Dutch philosopher Fons Edlers to debate an age-old question: is there such a thing as "innate" human nature independent of our experiences and external influences?
The resulting dialogue is one of the most original, provocative, and spontaneous exchanges to have occurred between contemporary philosophers, and above all serves as a concise introduction to their basic theories. What begins as a philosophical argument rooted in linguistics (Chomsky) and the theory of knowledge (Foucault), soon evolves into a broader discussion encompassing a wide range of topics, from science, history, and behaviorism to creativity, freedom, and the struggle for justice in the realm of politics.
In addition to the debate itself, this volume features a newly written introduction by noted Foucault scholar John Rajchman and includes additional text by Noam Chomsky.
具體描述
讀後感
莫尤 【早些时候用小号写过的一篇书评，偶然看到，纳闷怎么这么眼熟。。。。】 此书是1971年乔姆斯基与福柯论辩的产物，根据访谈者方斯.厄尔德斯的描述，“两位大师的外貌和内心大相径庭”，这恐怕是读后最粗浅的印象之一，乔姆斯基温婉而客气地滔滔不绝，时而蹦出些想象...
評分读这个对话录，内容倒先不讲。我起码觉得上得了台面的人辩证思维能力要发展得很好。两个人交流观点，其实是在补充同一个命题的不同方面，首先得有这种概念，并不是“你对我错”这种对立式的搏杀。人当然有主观倾向，prefer to 完全可以理解，都是情结在作怪。重要的是不是所有...
評分刚看完《乔姆斯基、福柯论辩录》，很久没有缓过劲来，里面说的很多问题，就是前几日与老师的讨论的话题。其实我的内心是站在乔姆斯基这边，对人性有着深刻的理解和认同，我们的学习方式并没有那么精确，是通过我们自身的图式来学习的，比如孩子学习语言，个人独创性及创造力，...
評分此书是1971年乔姆斯基与福柯论辩的产物，根据访谈者方斯.厄尔德斯的描述，“两位大师的外貌和内心大相径庭”，这恐怕是读后最粗浅的印象之一，乔姆斯基温婉而客气地滔滔不绝，时而蹦出些想象和比喻用以解释，而福柯这家伙学理性的话语缜密而透彻，丝毫不用多说，一点点就已经...
評分此书是1971年乔姆斯基与福柯论辩的产物，根据访谈者方斯.厄尔德斯的描述，“两位大师的外貌和内心大相径庭”，这恐怕是读后最粗浅的印象之一，乔姆斯基温婉而客气地滔滔不绝，时而蹦出些想象和比喻用以解释，而福柯这家伙学理性的话语缜密而透彻，丝毫不用多说，一点点就已经...
用戶評價
著名的“世紀辯論”實在是齣人意料的溫和。喬姆斯基的思路還是唯理主義那一套，福柯的思路倒是很結構主義。倒也沒有誰完勝誰，一個人完全可以在理解福柯的懷疑主義的情況下欣賞喬姆斯基的行動意誌。
评分A debate of the century.
评分看瞭視頻，前小半段福柯掉綫，後大半段喬姆斯基掉綫。能不能好瞭，福柯想迴傢瞭。
评分人的本質是虐戀和掠念，操
评分20世紀前半葉結構語言學成為顯學 喬姆斯基以其為靶子 而當結構主義擴散後 福柯以之為武器批判科技史中的主觀導嚮。所以二人都是對的 人類現象就是充滿綫索而又無法預測
相關圖書
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息，本站不存儲任何數據與內容，任何內容與數據均與本站無關，如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美書屋 版权所有