The Chomsky-Foucault Debate pdf epub mobi txt 電子書 下載2025
Noam Chomsky is Professor of Linguistics at MIT and a world-renowned political thinker and activist. The author of numerous books, including On Language and Understanding Power (both available from The New Press), he lives in Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Michel Foucault (1926-84) held a chair in the History of Systems of Thought at the Collège de France. The New Press has published three previous volumes of his work as well as a collection, The Essential Foucault.
John Rajchman is a professor of philosophy at Columbia University and author of Michel Foucault. He lives in New York City.
- Chomsky
- Foucault
- 哲學
- 福柯
- 語言學
- 社會理論
- 喬姆斯基
- 思想
Two of the twentieth century's most influential thinkers debate a perennial question.
In 1971, at the height of the Vietnam War and at a time of great political and social instability, two of the world's leading intellectuals, Noam Chomsky and Michel Foucault, were invited by Dutch philosopher Fons Edlers to debate an age-old question: is there such a thing as "innate" human nature independent of our experiences and external influences?
The resulting dialogue is one of the most original, provocative, and spontaneous exchanges to have occurred between contemporary philosophers, and above all serves as a concise introduction to their basic theories. What begins as a philosophical argument rooted in linguistics (Chomsky) and the theory of knowledge (Foucault), soon evolves into a broader discussion encompassing a wide range of topics, from science, history, and behaviorism to creativity, freedom, and the struggle for justice in the realm of politics.
In addition to the debate itself, this volume features a newly written introduction by noted Foucault scholar John Rajchman and includes additional text by Noam Chomsky.
具體描述
讀後感
莫尤 【早些时候用小号写过的一篇书评，偶然看到，纳闷怎么这么眼熟。。。。】 此书是1971年乔姆斯基与福柯论辩的产物，根据访谈者方斯.厄尔德斯的描述，“两位大师的外貌和内心大相径庭”，这恐怕是读后最粗浅的印象之一，乔姆斯基温婉而客气地滔...
評分读这个对话录，内容倒先不讲。我起码觉得上得了台面的人辩证思维能力要发展得很好。两个人交流观点，其实是在补充同一个命题的不同方面，首先得有这种概念，并不是“你对我错”这种对立式的搏杀。人当然有主观倾向，prefer to 完全可以理解，都是情结在作怪。重要的是不是所有...
評分读这个对话录，内容倒先不讲。我起码觉得上得了台面的人辩证思维能力要发展得很好。两个人交流观点，其实是在补充同一个命题的不同方面，首先得有这种概念，并不是“你对我错”这种对立式的搏杀。人当然有主观倾向，prefer to 完全可以理解，都是情结在作怪。重要的是不是所有...
評分莫尤 【早些时候用小号写过的一篇书评，偶然看到，纳闷怎么这么眼熟。。。。】 此书是1971年乔姆斯基与福柯论辩的产物，根据访谈者方斯.厄尔德斯的描述，“两位大师的外貌和内心大相径庭”，这恐怕是读后最粗浅的印象之一，乔姆斯基温婉而客气地滔滔不绝，时而蹦出些想象...
評分名学者的对话或者论辩，一向容易引起人的兴趣，因是思想的交锋，大师的对弈，无须第三者来阐释双方，直接过招。像千年前的宋朝那场鹅湖之会，四面八方的求知者赶来听辩论，听者之众，传说骑来的马把书院前的湖水都饮干了。当然观众也免不了抱有看一方出丑的期待。 福柯和乔姆斯...
用戶評價
著名的“世紀辯論”實在是齣人意料的溫和。喬姆斯基的思路還是唯理主義那一套，福柯的思路倒是很結構主義。倒也沒有誰完勝誰，一個人完全可以在理解福柯的懷疑主義的情況下欣賞喬姆斯基的行動意誌。
评分A debate of the century.
评分人的本質是虐戀和掠念，操
评分one of the most amazing books, if not the most amazing, on power and justice in our time.
评分one of the most amazing books, if not the most amazing, on power and justice in our time.
相關圖書
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息，本站不存儲任何數據與內容，任何內容與數據均與本站無關，如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美書屋 版权所有