The Chomsky-Foucault Debate pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2025
Noam Chomsky is Professor of Linguistics at MIT and a world-renowned political thinker and activist. The author of numerous books, including On Language and Understanding Power (both available from The New Press), he lives in Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Michel Foucault (1926-84) held a chair in the History of Systems of Thought at the Collège de France. The New Press has published three previous volumes of his work as well as a collection, The Essential Foucault.
John Rajchman is a professor of philosophy at Columbia University and author of Michel Foucault. He lives in New York City.
- Chomsky
- Foucault
- 哲学
- 福柯
- 语言学
- 社会理论
- 乔姆斯基
- 思想
Two of the twentieth century's most influential thinkers debate a perennial question.
In 1971, at the height of the Vietnam War and at a time of great political and social instability, two of the world's leading intellectuals, Noam Chomsky and Michel Foucault, were invited by Dutch philosopher Fons Edlers to debate an age-old question: is there such a thing as "innate" human nature independent of our experiences and external influences?
The resulting dialogue is one of the most original, provocative, and spontaneous exchanges to have occurred between contemporary philosophers, and above all serves as a concise introduction to their basic theories. What begins as a philosophical argument rooted in linguistics (Chomsky) and the theory of knowledge (Foucault), soon evolves into a broader discussion encompassing a wide range of topics, from science, history, and behaviorism to creativity, freedom, and the struggle for justice in the realm of politics.
In addition to the debate itself, this volume features a newly written introduction by noted Foucault scholar John Rajchman and includes additional text by Noam Chomsky.
具体描述
读后感
莫尤 【早些时候用小号写过的一篇书评，偶然看到，纳闷怎么这么眼熟。。。。】 此书是1971年乔姆斯基与福柯论辩的产物，根据访谈者方斯.厄尔德斯的描述，“两位大师的外貌和内心大相径庭”，这恐怕是读后最粗浅的印象之一，乔姆斯基温婉而客气地滔滔不绝，时而蹦出些想象...
评分莫尤 【早些时候用小号写过的一篇书评，偶然看到，纳闷怎么这么眼熟。。。。】 此书是1971年乔姆斯基与福柯论辩的产物，根据访谈者方斯.厄尔德斯的描述，“两位大师的外貌和内心大相径庭”，这恐怕是读后最粗浅的印象之一，乔姆斯基温婉而客气地滔...
评分1、民主社会的理想是好人的理想还是所有人的理想？2、现实在理论面前是狭隘的，还是理论在现实面前是狭隘的？3、哲学理想更漫无边际，还是政治理想更漫无边际？4、战争是人性的悲剧，却是历史的重要环节。5、看来中国的大同社会还太不为欧洲人所了解。最美好，也最接近现实的最...
评分名学者的对话或者论辩，一向容易引起人的兴趣，因是思想的交锋，大师的对弈，无须第三者来阐释双方，直接过招。像千年前的宋朝那场鹅湖之会，四面八方的求知者赶来听辩论，听者之众，传说骑来的马把书院前的湖水都饮干了。当然观众也免不了抱有看一方出丑的期待。 福柯和乔姆斯...
评分看《福柯的生死爱欲》又想起这书，谈到的好像就是这场世纪辩论。摘两段乔对福柯的评价，原书见第六章，p266&p268： 一边读一边发笑。我也不确定我读懂福柯多少，大概很少很少，但他真是个对我意义重大的哲学家（可能因为我们同一天生日，他就在我心里比较特别，哈哈）；在...
用户评价
原来这个我没有标过（。
评分Plato和Aristotle永远在辩论：上一个时代他们的化名是Chomsky和Foucault，在更久远的过去他们曾自称Bernard Shaw和G.K.Chesterton。而我总是倾向于支持后者。
评分原来这个我没有标过（。
评分看完了，读到后面明显越来越顺。。。当然我还是有一些问题看不太懂，作为我第一本看的真·政治哲学相关，值得纪念（。等我把chomsky和Foucault俩人的著作读一些之后会回来重读第一篇辩论的！（港真其实福柯后面那些文章对我启发大？（。
评分The Foucault-Chomsky Debate on Human Nature
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有