图书标签: Chomsky Foucault 哲学 福柯 语言学 社会理论 乔姆斯基 思想
发表于2025-01-22
The Chomsky-Foucault Debate pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2025
Two of the twentieth century's most influential thinkers debate a perennial question.
In 1971, at the height of the Vietnam War and at a time of great political and social instability, two of the world's leading intellectuals, Noam Chomsky and Michel Foucault, were invited by Dutch philosopher Fons Edlers to debate an age-old question: is there such a thing as "innate" human nature independent of our experiences and external influences?
The resulting dialogue is one of the most original, provocative, and spontaneous exchanges to have occurred between contemporary philosophers, and above all serves as a concise introduction to their basic theories. What begins as a philosophical argument rooted in linguistics (Chomsky) and the theory of knowledge (Foucault), soon evolves into a broader discussion encompassing a wide range of topics, from science, history, and behaviorism to creativity, freedom, and the struggle for justice in the realm of politics.
In addition to the debate itself, this volume features a newly written introduction by noted Foucault scholar John Rajchman and includes additional text by Noam Chomsky.
Noam Chomsky is Professor of Linguistics at MIT and a world-renowned political thinker and activist. The author of numerous books, including On Language and Understanding Power (both available from The New Press), he lives in Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Michel Foucault (1926-84) held a chair in the History of Systems of Thought at the Collège de France. The New Press has published three previous volumes of his work as well as a collection, The Essential Foucault.
John Rajchman is a professor of philosophy at Columbia University and author of Michel Foucault. He lives in New York City.
20世纪前半叶结构语言学成为显学 乔姆斯基以其为靶子 而当结构主义扩散后 福柯以之为武器批判科技史中的主观导向。所以二人都是对的 人类现象就是充满线索而又无法预测
评分看了视频,前小半段福柯掉线,后大半段乔姆斯基掉线。能不能好了,福柯想回家了。
评分这两个人,相当的萌啊。还有Said,你是不是Foucault的Fan啊~~= =||||
评分乔姆斯基:人性.. 福柯:没有人性。 C:要去中心化 .. F:醒醒吧没有人性这种东西。C:要战斗 .. F:但是你知道并没有人性 C:为了公义 .. F:不可能的因为没有人性 ..
评分人的本质是虐恋和掠念,操
看《福柯的生死爱欲》又想起这书,谈到的好像就是这场世纪辩论。摘两段乔对福柯的评价,原书见第六章,p266&p268: 一边读一边发笑。我也不确定我读懂福柯多少,大概很少很少,但他真是个对我意义重大的哲学家(可能因为我们同一天生日,他就在我心里比较特别,哈哈);在...
评分刚看完《乔姆斯基、福柯论辩录》,很久没有缓过劲来,里面说的很多问题,就是前几日与老师的讨论的话题。其实我的内心是站在乔姆斯基这边,对人性有着深刻的理解和认同,我们的学习方式并没有那么精确,是通过我们自身的图式来学习的,比如孩子学习语言,个人独创性及创造力,...
评分看《福柯的生死爱欲》又想起这书,谈到的好像就是这场世纪辩论。摘两段乔对福柯的评价,原书见第六章,p266&p268: 一边读一边发笑。我也不确定我读懂福柯多少,大概很少很少,但他真是个对我意义重大的哲学家(可能因为我们同一天生日,他就在我心里比较特别,哈哈);在...
评分名学者的对话或者论辩,一向容易引起人的兴趣,因是思想的交锋,大师的对弈,无须第三者来阐释双方,直接过招。像千年前的宋朝那场鹅湖之会,四面八方的求知者赶来听辩论,听者之众,传说骑来的马把书院前的湖水都饮干了。当然观众也免不了抱有看一方出丑的期待。 福柯和乔姆斯...
评分七十年代早期的时候,荷兰的一家公共电视台曾经做过一系列的知识分子对谈的电视节目,邀请有时候是意见相近,有时候观点完全相左的著名知识分子就一个固定的论题展开讨论。本书所记录的乔姆斯基和福科的讨论正是这一些列访谈节目中的一期,时间是1971年。 乔姆斯基那时候正是...
The Chomsky-Foucault Debate pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2025