The Chomsky-Foucault Debate pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2025
- Chomsky
- Foucault
- 哲学
- 福柯
- 语言学
- 社会理论
- 乔姆斯基
- 思想
- Chomsky Foucault debate
- linguistics philosophy
- power knowledge
- language structure
- critical theory
- academic discourse
- political philosophy
- structuralism
- discourse analysis
- sovereignty
具体描述
Two of the twentieth century's most influential thinkers debate a perennial question.
In 1971, at the height of the Vietnam War and at a time of great political and social instability, two of the world's leading intellectuals, Noam Chomsky and Michel Foucault, were invited by Dutch philosopher Fons Edlers to debate an age-old question: is there such a thing as "innate" human nature independent of our experiences and external influences?
The resulting dialogue is one of the most original, provocative, and spontaneous exchanges to have occurred between contemporary philosophers, and above all serves as a concise introduction to their basic theories. What begins as a philosophical argument rooted in linguistics (Chomsky) and the theory of knowledge (Foucault), soon evolves into a broader discussion encompassing a wide range of topics, from science, history, and behaviorism to creativity, freedom, and the struggle for justice in the realm of politics.
In addition to the debate itself, this volume features a newly written introduction by noted Foucault scholar John Rajchman and includes additional text by Noam Chomsky.
作者简介
Noam Chomsky is Professor of Linguistics at MIT and a world-renowned political thinker and activist. The author of numerous books, including On Language and Understanding Power (both available from The New Press), he lives in Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Michel Foucault (1926-84) held a chair in the History of Systems of Thought at the Collège de France. The New Press has published three previous volumes of his work as well as a collection, The Essential Foucault.
John Rajchman is a professor of philosophy at Columbia University and author of Michel Foucault. He lives in New York City.
目录信息
读后感
读这个对话录，内容倒先不讲。我起码觉得上得了台面的人辩证思维能力要发展得很好。两个人交流观点，其实是在补充同一个命题的不同方面，首先得有这种概念，并不是“你对我错”这种对立式的搏杀。人当然有主观倾向，prefer to 完全可以理解，都是情结在作怪。重要的是不是所有...
评分碰到跟福柯有关的书总是想唠叨两笔，也不知为什么。 这个辩论很早在youtube就传得很火，现在终于整理出了文字版，方便大家阅读。书的篇幅不长，两个小时读完足矣，不过内容却讨论的是社会科学乃至哲学的一些基本问题。所以我觉得这本书不要叫目前这个标题，还是应该叫原先那个...
评分此书是1971年乔姆斯基与福柯论辩的产物，根据访谈者方斯.厄尔德斯的描述，“两位大师的外貌和内心大相径庭”，这恐怕是读后最粗浅的印象之一，乔姆斯基温婉而客气地滔滔不绝，时而蹦出些想象和比喻用以解释，而福柯这家伙学理性的话语缜密而透彻，丝毫不用多说，一点点就已经...
评分名学者的对话或者论辩，一向容易引起人的兴趣，因是思想的交锋，大师的对弈，无须第三者来阐释双方，直接过招。像千年前的宋朝那场鹅湖之会，四面八方的求知者赶来听辩论，听者之众，传说骑来的马把书院前的湖水都饮干了。当然观众也免不了抱有看一方出丑的期待。 福柯和乔姆斯...
评分莫尤 【早些时候用小号写过的一篇书评，偶然看到，纳闷怎么这么眼熟。。。。】 此书是1971年乔姆斯基与福柯论辩的产物，根据访谈者方斯.厄尔德斯的描述，“两位大师的外貌和内心大相径庭”，这恐怕是读后最粗浅的印象之一，乔姆斯基温婉而客气地滔...
用户评价
乔姆斯基在福柯面前仿佛共产主义真善美小天使…第二部分权力中心化和去中心化对我有所启发。
评分Plato和Aristotle永远在辩论：上一个时代他们的化名是Chomsky和Foucault，在更久远的过去他们曾自称Bernard Shaw和G.K.Chesterton。而我总是倾向于支持后者。
评分这两个人，相当的萌啊。还有Said，你是不是Foucault的Fan啊~~= =||||
评分这说的就是被别人完爆了还不自知继续blablabla……鸡同鸭讲
评分Plato和Aristotle永远在辩论：上一个时代他们的化名是Chomsky和Foucault，在更久远的过去他们曾自称Bernard Shaw和G.K.Chesterton。而我总是倾向于支持后者。
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有