In this major theoretical statement, the author offers a new and provoctive interpretation of institutional transformations associated with modernity. What is modernity? The author suggests, "As a first approximation, let us simply say the following: 'modernity' refers to modes of social life or organization which emerged in Europe from about the seventeenth century onwards and which subsequently became more or less worldwide in their influence." We do not as yet, the author argues, live in a post-modern world. The distinctive characteristics of our major social institutions in the closing years of the twentieth century suggest that, rather than entering into a period of post-modernity, we are moving into a period of "high modernity" in which the consequences of modernity are becoming more radicalized and universalized than before. A post-modern social universe may eventualy come into being, but this as yet lies on the other side of the forms of social and cultural organization that currently dominate world history. In developing a fresh characterization of the nature of modernity, the author concentrates on the themes of "security versus danger and o "trust versus risk. Modernity is a double-edged phenomenon. The development of modern social institutions has created vastly greater opportunities for human beings to enjoy a secure and rewarding existencethan in any type of pre-modern system. But modernity also has a somber side that has become very important in the present century, such as the frequently degrading nature of modern industrial work, the growth of totalitarianism, the threat of environmentsal destruction, and the alrming development of military power and weaponry. The book builds upon the author's pevious theoretical writings and will be of great interest to those who have followed his work through the years. However, this book covers issues the author has not previously analyzed and extends the scope of his work into areas of pressing practical concern.
作者简介:
安东尼·吉登斯(1938— ) 战后英国最重要的社会学家之一,1938年出生于北伦敦的埃德蒙顿,1976年获剑桥大学博士学位,先后任教于莱切斯特大学、西蒙·弗雷泽大学、加州大学洛杉矶分校和剑桥大学,1997年起任伦敦政治经济学院院长。吉登斯一直处于当代社会学理论与实践的发展前沿,他的著作综括了近三十年来的社会政治变革,尤以构成理论和“第三条道路”的学说为全球学界所瞩目。他还是布莱尔政府的重要智囊之一。他的主要著作还有:《社会学》(1982)、《社会的构成》(1984)、《民族国家与暴力》(1985)、《超越左与右》(1994)、《第三条道路》(1998)。
【第一部分】 利奥塔:后现代性。扬弃宏大叙事、进步论、历史规律。知识的多样性。 反对:关于社会的系统性知识仍然是存在的。 现代性:社会进化论叙事 现代性:断裂 社会学经典创始人:马克思、涂尔干、韦伯都注意到现代工厂工作的不良后果。前两者认为现代性自身能解决之...
评分【第一部分】 利奥塔:后现代性。扬弃宏大叙事、进步论、历史规律。知识的多样性。 反对:关于社会的系统性知识仍然是存在的。 现代性:社会进化论叙事 现代性:断裂 社会学经典创始人:马克思、涂尔干、韦伯都注意到现代工厂工作的不良后果。前两者认为现代性自身能解决之...
评分没有任何经典的社会学的创始人对“战争的工业化”现象给予过系统性的关注。在“进步”中失去信仰是导致历史“宏大叙事性”终结的主要因素之一。 社会系统的“延伸”是通过应用于估算技术知识的测试的非人格性质以及用来控制其形式的公众批评来实现的,而这种公众批评正是技术性...
评分 评分【第一部分】 利奥塔:后现代性。扬弃宏大叙事、进步论、历史规律。知识的多样性。 反对:关于社会的系统性知识仍然是存在的。 现代性:社会进化论叙事 现代性:断裂 社会学经典创始人:马克思、涂尔干、韦伯都注意到现代工厂工作的不良后果。前两者认为现代性自身能解决之...
吉登斯在理论的综融和应用上达到了难以企及的高度,虽是探讨现代性,吉登斯理论上广阔的视野和联系会让理论和背景准备不足的读者无所适从。
评分学术英语…………
评分学术英语…………
评分现代性给了我们更多选择的同时,也给了我们更多的迷失。活在当下越来越难,呵呵。
评分现代性给了我们更多选择的同时,也给了我们更多的迷失。活在当下越来越难,呵呵。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有