The Great Divergence brings new insight to one of the classic questions of history: Why did sustained industrial growth begin in Northwest Europe, despite surprising similarities between advanced areas of Europe and East Asia? As Ken Pomeranz shows, as recently as 1750, parallels between these two parts of the world were very high in life expectancy, consumption, product and factor markets, and the strategies of households. Perhaps most surprisingly, Pomeranz demonstrates that the Chinese and Japanese cores were no worse off ecologically than Western Europe. Core areas throughout the eighteenth-century Old World faced comparable local shortages of land-intensive products, shortages that were only partly resolved by trade.
Pomeranz argues that Europe's nineteenth-century divergence from the Old World owes much to the fortunate location of coal, which substituted for timber. This made Europe's failure to use its land intensively much less of a problem, while allowing growth in energy-intensive industries. Another crucial difference that he notes has to do with trade. Fortuitous global conjunctures made the Americas a greater source of needed primary products for Europe than any Asian periphery. This allowed Northwest Europe to grow dramatically in population, specialize further in manufactures, and remove labor from the land, using increased imports rather than maximizing yields. Together, coal and the New World allowed Europe to grow along resource-intensive, labor-saving paths.
Meanwhile, Asia hit a cul-de-sac. Although the East Asian hinterlands boomed after 1750, both in population and in manufacturing, this growth prevented these peripheral regions from exporting vital resources to the cloth-producing Yangzi Delta. As a result, growth in the core of East Asia's economy essentially stopped, and what growth did exist was forced along labor-intensive, resource-saving paths--paths Europe could have been forced down, too, had it not been for favorable resource stocks from underground and overseas.
彭慕蘭(Kenneth Pomeranz),美國加利福尼亞大學爾灣分校曆史係主任、曆史和東亞語言文學教授,加州大學係統世界史研究組主任。其大部分著作圍繞著中國和比較經濟發展、農村社會變革、環境變革及政府的形成等展開研究,但也著有民間宗教史和傢庭結構及性彆角色史方麵的著作。
所谓的“有缘无分”说的就是和《大分流》与我。 还在念书时,在书店里、文章中和其他地方无数次遇见,甚至将它加进购物车好久,但始终也没真正拥有它。今天去单位图书馆,作为“副产品”借到这本书。似乎比之前见到的薄许多,不到400页。2003年版。 希望这部所谓“尔湾学派”...
評分多年前,加州大学尔湾分校的彭慕然(Kenneth Pomeranz)的一部《大分流》在世界汉学界引起了巨大反响。一时间,赞成者和反对者论战不止,国内也是”群雄混战”,也算是近来学术界的奇观之一。彭慕然的书之所以能够如此轰动,归根结底乃是因为作者观点的与众不同。 传统上,中外...
評分 評分所谓的“有缘无分”说的就是和《大分流》与我。 还在念书时,在书店里、文章中和其他地方无数次遇见,甚至将它加进购物车好久,但始终也没真正拥有它。今天去单位图书馆,作为“副产品”借到这本书。似乎比之前见到的薄许多,不到400页。2003年版。 希望这部所谓“尔湾学派”...
emgs
评分今天中國經濟史結課還是挺感慨的,本科課程基本結束,但對許多問題的糾結和思考,大概纔剛剛開始。希望未來還能糾結很久。感謝大梁神上課盡職盡責地把這本書復述瞭一遍,不然大概沒毅力細讀;也要深深感激送我這本書的童鞋=D
评分有種不知所雲的感覺.
评分今天那些喜歡說“在中國”就是會發生很多爛事,“在西方”就會發生很多好事的人,未來大概還會齣現一本這樣的書告訴你其實都一樣。甚至西方不如中國,這時小琥阿姨就會齣來唱一首:“沒~那麼簡單~”
评分今天中國經濟史結課還是挺感慨的,本科課程基本結束,但對許多問題的糾結和思考,大概纔剛剛開始。希望未來還能糾結很久。感謝大梁神上課盡職盡責地把這本書復述瞭一遍,不然大概沒毅力細讀;也要深深感激送我這本書的童鞋=D
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美書屋 版权所有