Chinese Society in the Age of Confucius is based on the most up-to-date archaeological discoveries. It introduces new data, as well as new ways to think about them - modes of analysis that, while familiar to archaeological practitioners in the West and in Japan, are herein applied to evidence from the Chinese Bronze Age for the first time. The treatment of social stratification, clan and lineage organisation, as well as gender and ethnic differences will be of interest to those involved in the general or comparative analysis of grand themes in the Social Sciences.
Lothar von Falkenhausen obtained a PhD in anthropology at Harvard University in 1988. Having taught at Stanford University and UC Riverside, he came to UCLA in 1993 and was promoted to Professor in 1997. His research concerns the archaeology of the Chinese Bronze Age, preferably focusing on large interdisciplinary and historical issues on which archaeological materials can provide significant new information. One example of this orientation are his numerous publications on musical instruments (especially chime-bells), culminating in his book Suspended Music (University of California Press, 1993). Other publications concern ancient Chinese bronzes and their inscriptions, ritual, regional cultures, archaeological synthesis, ancient trans-Asiatic contacts, and methodological issues. As the American co-PI of the ongoing Peking University-UCLA Joint Archaeological Project, he is directing excavations at ancient salt-production sites in the Yangzi River Basin. He serves as editor of the Journal of East Asian Archaeology and of the Early China Special Monographs Series.
1.有時文獻功夫顯得粗疏。 以《戰國策》一書為戰國時代其名稱來源(p8)。 2.作者的考古學觀念及方法論 強調考古材料自身對歷史上社會政治探索的價值,而不是如多數中國考古學家所流行的觀念那樣:僅僅作為文獻的佐證材料,或者特別傾向於以銘文材料為基於文獻的歷史學研究服務...
评分罗泰此书出版时,夏含夷曾写过一篇书评,他对罗泰本书中刻意回避文献的研究方式表示了批评。然而细读罗泰此书,我们似乎可以从罗泰这种近于极端的以考古学为中心的方法中学到一些东西。从罗泰的选题、方法选择以及研究效果上我们也可以追迹他这种“偏颇”的考古中心的刻意性。 ...
评分西周晚期的礼制改革:孔子及其后人所推崇的周代礼乐制度并不形成于西周早期(周公),而是西周晚期以后形成的新的政治体制。 把整个周代八百年命名为“孔子时代” 考古学必须从文献历史学的束缚中解放出来。 考古学是研究社会其他非贵族阶层的唯一可能的资料来源。 本书主要关...
评分汉学家的著作,偏重考古材料和现代阐释,缺少文献和文字材料的研究脉络。看重异质性人群的研究,但大多数问题还是国内学者看得更深。
评分汉学家的著作,偏重考古材料和现代阐释,缺少文献和文字材料的研究脉络。看重异质性人群的研究,但大多数问题还是国内学者看得更深。
评分范围广泛,观点新颖,材料清晰
评分范围广泛,观点新颖,材料清晰
评分汉学家的著作,偏重考古材料和现代阐释,缺少文献和文字材料的研究脉络。看重异质性人群的研究,但大多数问题还是国内学者看得更深。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有