Since its initial publication nearly fifteen years ago The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order has become a classic work of international relations and one of the most influential books ever written about foreign affairs. An insightful and powerful analysis of the forces driving global politics, it is as indispensable to our understanding of American foreign policy today as the day it was published. As former National Security Adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski says in his new foreword to the book, it “has earned a place on the shelf of only about a dozen or so truly enduring works that provide the quintessential insights necessary for a broad understanding of world affairs in our time.” Samuel Huntington explains how clashes between civilizations are the greatest threat to world peace but also how an international order based on civilizations is the best safeguard against war. Events since the publication of the book have proved the wisdom of that analysis. The 9/11 attacks and wars in Iraq and Afghanistan have demonstrated the threat of civilizations but have also shown how vital international cross-civilization cooperation is to restoring peace. As ideological distinctions among nations have been replaced by cultural differences, world politics has been reconfigured. Across the globe, new conflicts—and new cooperation—have replaced the old order of the Cold War era. The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order explains how the population explosion in Muslim countries and the economic rise of East Asia are changing global politics. These developments challenge Western dominance, promote opposition to supposedly “universal” Western ideals, and intensify intercivilization conflict over such issues as nuclear proliferation, immigration, human rights, and democracy. The Muslim population surge has led to many small wars throughout Eurasia, and the rise of China could lead to a global war of civilizations. Huntington offers a strategy for the West to preserve its unique culture and emphasizes the need for people everywhere to learn to coexist in a complex, multipolar, muliticivilizational world.
Samuel Phillips Huntington (April 18, 1927 – December 24, 2008) was an influential conservative political scientist from the United States of America whose works covered multiple sub-fields of political science. He gained wider prominence through his Clash of Civilizations (1993, 1996) thesis of a post-Cold War new world order.
He was a member of Harvard's department of government from 1950 until he was denied tenure in 1959.From 1959 to 1962 he was an associate professor of government at Columbia University where he was also Deputy Director of The Institute for War and Peace Studies. Huntington was invited to return to Harvard with tenure in 1963 and remained there until his death. He was elected a Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences in 1965.Huntington and Warren Demian Manshel co-founded and co-edited Foreign Policy. Huntington stayed as co-editor until 1977.
His first major book was The Soldier and the State: The Theory and Politics of Civil-Military Relations, (1957) which was highly controversial when it was published, but today is regarded as the most influential book on American civil-military relations. He became prominent with his Political Order in Changing Societies (1968), a work that challenged the conventional view of modernization theorists, that economic and social progress would produce stable democracies in recently decolonized countries. As a consultant to the U.S. Department of State, and in an influential 1968 article in Foreign Affairs, he advocated the concentration of the rural population of South Vietnam as a means of isolating the Viet Cong. He also was co-author of The Crisis of Democracy: On the Governability of Democracies, a report issued by the Trilateral Commission in 1976. During 1977 and 1978, in the administration of Jimmy Carter, he was the White House Coordinator of Security Planning for the National Security Council.
Huntington died on December 24, 2008, at age 81 in Martha's Vineyard, Massachusetts.
虽然此书写作距今已有25年,却依然很有意义,时间甚至为书中观点提供了更多的证据。书中附录貌似公允的评论,看来仍是一副中庸面孔,所谓以“他只抓住了认同感冲撞的一个方面、一个角度。大文化内部的认同冲突要远远多于大文化之间的认同冲突”,质疑亨廷顿提出的文明冲突理论...
评分内在过于用力的结果是对外在的怀疑, 若是内在产生空洞,外在的情感或者物质无法填补,必须要靠足够的精神去支持。 要么内在足够强大,要么获得与外在的平衡, 当然两者最好皆有。 然而通常,外在并不受控制,内在的强大并不如所需要的那样足够。 这是大部分人必须要面对或者实...
评分 评分 评分三天以前,确切地说是2008年12月27日,美国著名政治学家,哈佛大学退休教授塞缪尔•亨廷顿在波士顿逝世,享年81岁。我看到这则新闻,谈不上什么特殊的感受,却想起了曾经翻看过的这本著述。 有些人是第一眼就可以给人留下深刻印象的,甚至说他的一言一行,某种言论足以影响...
[English version]挑刺当然可以,但这么系统性地论述世界文明真心觉得棒。而且Huntington作为一个西方人,能如此不West-centered看问题,太不容易了。Islam的部分学到了特别多,导致我现在特别想去土耳其看一看。而美国如何处理自身Western heritage和diversify的平衡,也非常有启发。
评分可以说,这不是一个严谨的研究,而是一个猜想和论断。变化社会—艰难抉择—第三波—文明冲突,亨氏骨子里实为一极传统之保守/现实主义者:意识到人类思想与力量之有限,故坚守宗教底线,强调秩序优先,怀疑进步主义、普世精神,对政治社会工程审慎乐观,和而不同(我不同化你你也别同化我),主张群体间最基本互惠容忍、超过者皆视为干涉。本书引用例子时代性强,故略狭隘:巴尔干乱局未扩展为文明边界战争,冷战后初期中国与伊斯兰经贸军事联系未扩展为广义文明联盟(且中国向来警惕绿教渗透),俄国近邻地区动乱很快平息。但对于世界政治许多总体趋势,特别是伊斯兰快速复兴和扩张,有发人深省的分析。在认同政治复兴、个人认同愈来愈碎片化的世代,难以否认以文明为单位观察世界并重构世界秩序的诱惑性:它也许让进步主义者失望,却简洁而稳定。
评分极好。高屋建瓴,不偏不激不刻意,reference也翔实客观。最后几章尤有大开大阖之势,二十年前能有这样的远见与卓识,Huntington的确是无愧一流国关大师之名。
评分亚洲部分不是很深刻 但是1996年写的关于伊斯兰和西方文明的冲突从2001年之后正在被“实现” 可惜没有解决方案
评分思想的遗产啊,虽然其他人也断断续续提过,但是这么系统的讲解实在是太珍贵。 其实我觉得在无处不在的文化差异里,找到那个共同点是合作的前提,在文化外衣下,掩盖着人类共同的问题。所以,“求同存异”这个外交理念是非常合理的。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有