Before and Beyond Divergence pdf epub mobi txt 電子書 下載2025
Jean-Laurent Rosenthal is the Rea A. and Lela G. Axline Professor of Business Economics at the California Institute of Technology.
R. Bin Wong is Professor of History and Director of the Asia Institute at the University of California, Los Angeles.
- 經濟史
- 海外中國研究
- 曆史
- Bin.Wong
- Economics
- 歐洲
- 王國斌
- history
China has reemerged as a powerhouse in the global economy, reviving a classic question in economic history: why did sustained economic growth arise in Europe rather than in China?
Many favor cultural and environmental explanations of the nineteenth-century economic divergence between Europe and the rest of the world. This book, the product of over twenty years of research, takes a sharply different tack. It argues that political differences which crystallized well before 1800 were responsible both for China’s early and more recent prosperity and for Europe’s difficulties after the fall of the Roman Empire and during early industrialization.
Rosenthal and Wong show that relative prices matter to how economies evolve; institutions can have a large effect on relative prices; and the spatial scale of polities can affect the choices of institutions in the long run. Their historical perspective on institutional change has surprising implications for understanding modern transformations in China and Europe and for future expectations. It also yields insights in comparative economic history, essential to any larger social science account of modern world history.
具體描述
讀後感
美国“加州学派”历史学者彭慕兰（Kenneth Pomeranz）的《大分流》曾高调进入中国。2004年，大陆和台湾同时出版了中译本（两岸译者都以经济史为其主要研究领域，简体版是史建云，繁体版是邱澎生）。《大分流》使“大分流”成为学术界和读书圈的流行词，也再度引起对“中国何以...
評分had the honor of meeting with the two authors today, so it occurred to me that I should write a review for this book. if you look at the literature, the cooperation between economics and history is way less successful than I once thought.To quote this book...
評分 評分作者简介：周琳，清华大学院历史系。 文章来源：《清华大学学报：哲社版》，2009年第1期，第50-58页。 摘要：在中国社会经济史学界，“加州学派”近年来影响日益扩大，其观点正变得日益清晰和引人瞩目。“加州学派”并不是一个无差别的整体，而是不同国别、不同研究领域、不同...
評分用戶評價
隻看每個chapter的開頭結尾，略去中間隻抓結論，沒辦法精讀真的來不及瞭……感覺還是王國斌一貫的主張，然後和彭慕蘭原著套瞭一下，算是對彭著一個很好的補充……姑且算是為整個研究範式添磚加瓦瞭吧
评分隻看每個chapter的開頭結尾，略去中間隻抓結論，沒辦法精讀真的來不及瞭……感覺還是王國斌一貫的主張，然後和彭慕蘭原著套瞭一下，算是對彭著一個很好的補充……姑且算是為整個研究範式添磚加瓦瞭吧
评分我學力有限對不住
评分Ch3 第二手材料 缺乏可信度 關於long distance的定義也有點詭異 不過 尚有啓發
评分隻看每個chapter的開頭結尾，略去中間隻抓結論，沒辦法精讀真的來不及瞭……感覺還是王國斌一貫的主張，然後和彭慕蘭原著套瞭一下，算是對彭著一個很好的補充……姑且算是為整個研究範式添磚加瓦瞭吧
相關圖書
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息，本站不存儲任何數據與內容，任何內容與數據均與本站無關，如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美書屋 版权所有