William T. Rowe is John and Diane Cooke Professor of Chinese History at Johns Hopkins University
In a brisk revisionist history, William Rowe challenges the standard narrative of Qing China as a decadent, inward-looking state that failed to keep pace with the modern West.
The Great Qing was the second major Chinese empire ruled by foreigners. Three strong Manchu emperors worked diligently to secure an alliance with the conquered Ming gentry, though many of their social edicts—especially the requirement that ethnic Han men wear queues—were fiercely resisted. As advocates of a “universal” empire, Qing rulers also achieved an enormous expansion of the Chinese realm over the course of three centuries, including the conquest and incorporation of Turkic and Tibetan peoples in the west, vast migration into the southwest, and the colonization of Taiwan.
Despite this geographic range and the accompanying social and economic complexity, the Qing ideal of “small government” worked well when outside threats were minimal. But the nineteenth-century Opium Wars forced China to become a player in a predatory international contest involving Western powers, while the devastating uprisings of the Taiping and Boxer rebellions signaled an urgent need for internal reform. Comprehensive state-mandated changes during the early twentieth century were not enough to hold back the nationalist tide of 1911, but they provided a new foundation for the Republican and Communist states that would follow.
This original, thought-provoking history of China’s last empire is a must-read for understanding the challenges facing China today.
本套系列始于秦朝公元前221年,止于清朝公元1912年,横跨2133年,治乱更替,分分合合,各色枭雄如流星般璀璨登场,闪耀一时一方,遮饰累累白骨万千,留下迷离的专属印记,更多则溶于悠远绵长的中华血脉。 历史事件有很多藏于永不可解的迷雾,历史观因人因事也在世代轮转,不变...
评分理解不深,暂将纷乱的思绪记录在这里。 因先读过钱穆《国史大纲》《中国历代政治得失》,再读《哈佛中国史06:最后的中华帝国》一书,所以难免有将两书进行比较的思想。 钱穆对清朝统治的评价观点鲜明:清朝和元朝及历史上的少数民族政权一样,是狭义的部族政权对汉族的统治,其...
评分大清帝国是曾立基于今日中国地区的政治实体中最庞大的一个。比起其在1644年取而代之的明帝国,清帝国的疆域是明代的两倍多,而人口则超过明代的三倍,至清末已达到5亿之多。在清帝国内不只有视自己为“中国人”的人群,亦有许多过去从未整合进中国王朝政体中的族群,包括西藏人...
评分断断续续看了很久,昨天刚读完。罗威廉的清史最大的特点就是精要二字。 “精”当然说是简要。清朝近三百年的历史,全部浓缩在三百页不到的篇幅,而且它是将清朝当作一个整体来解读,而没有按通常1840年为界进行划分,描述了清朝由盛转衰的连续性。 “要”则说的是罗威廉选取...
评分理解不深,暂将纷乱的思绪记录在这里。 因先读过钱穆《国史大纲》《中国历代政治得失》,再读《哈佛中国史06:最后的中华帝国》一书,所以难免有将两书进行比较的思想。 钱穆对清朝统治的评价观点鲜明:清朝和元朝及历史上的少数民族政权一样,是狭义的部族政权对汉族的统治,其...
清史入门第一本!非常好的总结。这就是利用史学家的研究,写出自己关于清史的narrative的模板。如果用来做lecture也非常适合,既有历史发展脉络,又融合了各派见解,并整合为一个叙事整体。
评分鸿篇巨制
评分太喜欢用法语单词了,如果把尾注换成脚注就更好了。
评分Fast-paced and highly readable, especially its introduction, although catered towards an American readership of course.
评分新清史handbook
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有