This monograph was published almost 30 years ago, but some points in them still seemed vibrant in current academic circle on traditional Chinese poetics. After a little tediously long definition of the terminology to distinguish the difference of terms su...
評分This monograph was published almost 30 years ago, but some points in them still seemed vibrant in current academic circle on traditional Chinese poetics. After a little tediously long definition of the terminology to distinguish the difference of terms su...
評分This monograph was published almost 30 years ago, but some points in them still seemed vibrant in current academic circle on traditional Chinese poetics. After a little tediously long definition of the terminology to distinguish the difference of terms su...
評分This monograph was published almost 30 years ago, but some points in them still seemed vibrant in current academic circle on traditional Chinese poetics. After a little tediously long definition of the terminology to distinguish the difference of terms su...
評分This monograph was published almost 30 years ago, but some points in them still seemed vibrant in current academic circle on traditional Chinese poetics. After a little tediously long definition of the terminology to distinguish the difference of terms su...
雖然那麼重要然而讀起來好無趣……
评分Yu 27歲從Stanford...Ph.D畢業…最近看書養成一個習慣,先搜author的CV看人傢幾歲博士畢業。這説明自己開始不淡定瞭
评分Yu 27歲從Stanford...Ph.D畢業…最近看書養成一個習慣,先搜author的CV看人傢幾歲博士畢業。這説明自己開始不淡定瞭
评分雖然那麼重要然而讀起來好無趣……
评分艱難啃完。餘寶琳30年前的專著始終置於西方文學metaphor和allegory的差異視野下來對中世紀中國經典文學的imagery的轉變進行梳理和對比,太過強調「賦比興」的邏輯線索而對其他問題有所忽略。#壹陸讀#095 #SOAS
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美書屋 版权所有