An international and historical look at how parenting choices change in the face of economic inequality
Parents everywhere want their children to be happy and do well. Yet how parents seek to achieve this ambition varies enormously. For instance, American and Chinese parents are increasingly authoritative and authoritarian, whereas Scandinavian parents tend to be more permissive. Why? Love, Money, and Parenting investigates how economic forces and growing inequality shape how parents raise their children. From medieval times to the present, and from the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, Italy, Spain, and Sweden to China and Japan, Matthias Doepke and Fabrizio Zilibotti look at how economic incentives and constraints--such as money, knowledge, and time--influence parenting practices and what is considered good parenting in different countries.
Through personal anecdotes and original research, Doepke and Zilibotti show that in countries with increasing economic inequality, such as the United States, parents push harder to ensure their children have a path to security and success. Economics has transformed the hands-off parenting of the 1960s and '70s into a frantic, overscheduled activity. Growing inequality has also resulted in an increasing "parenting gap" between richer and poorer families, raising the disturbing prospect of diminished social mobility and fewer opportunities for children from disadvantaged backgrounds. In nations with less economic inequality, such as Sweden, the stakes are less high, and social mobility is not under threat. Doepke and Zilibotti discuss how investments in early childhood development and the design of education systems factor into the parenting equation, and how economics can help shape policies that will contribute to the ideal of equal opportunity for all.
Love, Money, and Parenting presents an engrossing look at the economics of the family in the modern world.
Matthias Doepke is professor of economics at Northwestern University. He lives in Evanston, Illinois. Fabrizio Zilibotti is the Tuntex Professor of International and Development Economics at Yale University. He lives in New Haven, Connecticut.
近一个星期读的一本有意思的书,鸡蛙是个国际性问题啊!本书不是育儿指南,只是对当下世界教育风气和状况的一种经济学解释。 君不见,关于培训孩子的海淀黄庄各种段子满天飞,已有魔幻色彩。我们这个城市的4大名校之一的鸭梨中学附近也号称“妖圈”,各种各样的琳琅满目的培训...
评分 评分看了之后感觉美国在发达国家中算不上好的。收入非常不平等,贫富差异很大,人权水平和欧洲国家比也不算高,家长需要购买昂贵的托育服务。家长投入很多时间和金钱去培育下一代,希望孩子能沿着社会阶梯向上爬。而欧洲国家很多家长则更为淡定放养。 作者研究的国家样本中,最让人...
评分这两天看到一条转发的朋友圈: 问:孩子四岁,英语词汇量只有1500,是不是不够? 答:看在哪儿,在美国够了,在中国可能不够。 英语词汇量1500是什么概念呢?依稀记得,我小学毕业可能也就这个词汇量。当然,时代在进步,我作为一个90后,跟10后相比几乎差了一辈,用以前的标准...
喜欢这本书。经济学家的背景婉婉道来美国,欧洲(北欧,西班牙,法国,意大利)和东亚(日本,中国)不同的社会环境造成了不同的父母(专制型,说教型和随波逐流型)。里面还有大量的数据实证分析。准备买一本收藏之。
评分喜欢这本书。经济学家的背景婉婉道来美国,欧洲(北欧,西班牙,法国,意大利)和东亚(日本,中国)不同的社会环境造成了不同的父母(专制型,说教型和随波逐流型)。里面还有大量的数据实证分析。准备买一本收藏之。
评分随便看看吧。主要就是说,由于各国的经济政策这些年的变化,以及贫富差距加大,世界范围内,家长管的都越来越加强孩子的教育。intensive和permissive parenting各有利弊,每家对hardworking,independence,creativity的看重程度不同而已哈。 看完后个人认为既然孩子在中国,还是萝卜加大棒都要有,模仿瑞典芬兰的permissive parenting不具备人家的社会背景,tiger mom式教育挺符合我国国情的。
评分不管什么教育模式,都是历史、文化、社会、经济环境和政府政策共同影响的产物,所以也就没有非此即彼,也没有对错可言,只是应用程度的问题。个人觉得要想实行完全放任自由的教育理念,至少得有资金获取最好的教育资源,能提供一个良好的环境,才能完全放任小孩自我习得和成长。(第一次完整听完一本audiobook,发现听书还挺有效率的呀~)
评分喜欢这本书。经济学家的背景婉婉道来美国,欧洲(北欧,西班牙,法国,意大利)和东亚(日本,中国)不同的社会环境造成了不同的父母(专制型,说教型和随波逐流型)。里面还有大量的数据实证分析。准备买一本收藏之。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有