In Super Bowl XLIX, Seahawks coach Pete Carroll made one of the most controversial calls in football history: With 26 seconds remaining, and trailing by four at the Patriots' one-yard line, he called for a pass instead of a hand off to his star running back. The pass was intercepted and the Seahawks lost. Critics called it the dumbest play in history. But was the call really that bad? Or did Carroll actually make a great move that was ruined by bad luck?
Even the best decision doesn't yield the best outcome every time. There's always an element of luck that you can't control, and there is always information that is hidden from view. So the key to long-term success (and avoiding worrying yourself to death) is to think in bets: How sure am I? What are the possible ways things could turn out? What decision has the highest odds of success? Did I land in the unlucky 10% on the strategy that works 90% of the time? Or is my success attributable to dumb luck rather than great decision making?
Annie Duke, a former World Series of Poker champion turned business consultant, draws on examples from business, sports, politics, and (of course) poker to share tools anyone can use to embrace uncertainty and make better decisions. For most people, it's difficult to say "I'm not sure" in a world that values and, even, rewards the appearance of certainty. But professional poker players are comfortable with the fact that great decisions don't always lead to great outcomes and bad decisions don't always lead to bad outcomes.
By shifting your thinking from a need for certainty to a goal of accurately assessing what you know and what you don't, you'll be less vulnerable to reactive emotions, knee-jerk biases, and destructive habits in your decision making. You'll become more confident, calm, compassionate and successful in the long run.
Annie Duke (born Anne LaBarr Lederer) is a professional poker player and author who won a bracelet in the 2004 World Series of Poker $2,000 Omaha Hi-Low Split-8 or Better Event and was the winner of the 2004 World Series of Poker Tournament of Champions, where she earned the Winner-Take-All prize of $2,000,000.
决策高手和普通人有气质和境界上的差异,贝叶斯定理:科学决策的第一步是把你对事物的判断概率化。例子 可能会下雨改为下雨可能性65%。头脑清醒的人区分决策和运气,因为结果没成功只是运气问题。普通人关注结果以结果为导向,高手关注系统这是科学决策的基本功。自利性偏差。对...
评分一看到“赌”这个词,会觉得是个偏负面的词,俗话说的好:十赌九输,赢也是运气好。然而从另一个角度看我们生活中做的每一个决策其实都是在“赌”。 本书从职业扑克选手角度详细分析了关于技巧和运气的区别。成王败寇的思想在我们的观念里根深蒂固,导致大家片面的以结果来判断...
评分由于具有不确定性(运气因素),生活更像是扑克而不是象棋,因此学习对赌思维十分必要。 对赌思维就是认识到决策的质量和运气在影响着我们的生活,因此我们要去学习分辨两者。普通人以结果为导向(把结果等同于决策质量),而高手关注系统。以结果为导向就会导致瞎JB更改决策系...
评分由于具有不确定性(运气因素),生活更像是扑克而不是象棋,因此学习对赌思维十分必要。 对赌思维就是认识到决策的质量和运气在影响着我们的生活,因此我们要去学习分辨两者。普通人以结果为导向(把结果等同于决策质量),而高手关注系统。以结果为导向就会导致瞎JB更改决策系...
思想资源上溯到密尔的《论自由》,也综合了近年来行为经济学的研究成果。因为不确定,因为能力和运气交织影响结果,所以得用打牌下赌注的概率思维来考虑如何决策。既要从积极的结果倒推需要采取的步骤,也要预见到光明前途中的困难,做好应对准备。感觉跟中国谚语中的一些人生智慧不谋而合。
评分audible 已读, 虽然没有特别多可执行的建议,但是对整理思路还是有好处的
评分冗长和过多例子堆砌,实则干货特别少。只要是接触过cognitive science和decision making的,对书中概念应该非常熟悉。书中唯一有点建设性意见的是寻找truthseeking group。以及不断提醒自己,少点偏见。
评分说的很有道理,而且也给了操作办法,好书!
评分via 西昂翔
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有