The Confucian-Legalist State pdf epub mobi txt 电子书下载 2025

简体网页||繁体网页

☆☆☆☆☆

出版者:Oxford University Press

作者:Dingxin Zhao

出品人:

页数:472

译者:

出版时间:2015-11-13

价格:USD 85.00

装帧:Hardcover

isbn号码:9780199351732

丛书系列:Oxford Studies in Early Empires

图书标签:

赵鼎新
历史社会学
社会学
政治学
历史
儒法国家
海外中国研究
先秦史
儒法合流
中国传统政治
国家治理
法家思想
儒家思想
古代中国
政治制度
历史哲学
统治术
思想史

下载链接在页面底部

facebook linkedin mastodon messenger pinterest reddit telegram twitter viber vkontakte whatsapp 复制链接

想要找书就要到小美书屋

book.quotespace.org

立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本页

你会得到大惊喜!!

具体描述

In the The Confucian-Legalist State, Dingxin Zhao offers a radically new analysis of Chinese imperial history from the eleventh century BCE to the fall of the Qing dynasty. This study first uncovers the factors that explain how, and why, China developed into a bureaucratic empire under the Qin dynasty in 221 BCE. It then examines the political system that crystallized during the Western Han dynasty, a system that drew on China's philosophical traditions of Confucianism and Legalism. Despite great changes in China's demography, religion, technology, and socioeconomic structures, this Confucian-Legalist political system survived for over two millennia. Yet, it was precisely because of the system's resilience that China, for better or worse, did not develop industrial capitalism as Western Europe did, notwithstanding China's economic prosperity and technological sophistication beginning with the Northern Song dynasty.

In examining the nature of this political system, Zhao offers a new way of viewing Chinese history, one that emphasizes the importance of structural forces and social mechanisms in shaping historical dynamics. As a work of historical sociology, The Confucian-Legalist State aims to show how the patterns of Chinese history were not shaped by any single force, but instead by meaningful activities of social actors which were greatly constrained by, and at the same time reproduced and modified, the constellations of political, economic, military, and ideological forces. This book thus offers a startling new understanding of long-term patterns of Chinese history, one that should trigger debates for years to come among historians, political scientists, and sociologists.

作者简介

Dingxin Zhao is Professor of Sociology at the University of Chicago and the author of several books, including the award-winning Power of Tiananmen (University of Chicago Press, 2001).

目录信息

Preface
A Disclaimer
Maps
Part I. Empirical and Theoretical Considerations
Introduction
Chapter 1: A Theory of Historical Change
Part II. The Historical Background of the Eastern Zhou Dynasty
Chapter 2: The Western Zhou (ca. 1045-771 BCE) Order and Its Decline
Chapter 3: The Historical Setting of Eastern Zhou, an Age of War
Part III. War-driven Dynamism in Eastern Zhou
Chapter 4: The Age of Hegemons (770-546 BCE)
Chapter 5: The Age of Transition (545-420 BCE)
Chapter 6: In the Age of Total War (419-221 BCE): (1) Philosophies and Philosophers
Chapter 7: In the Age of Total War: (2) Absolutism Prevailing
Chapter 8: In the Age of Total War: (3) Qin and the Drive toward Unification
Chapter 9: Western Han and the Advent of the Confucian-Legalist State
Part IV. The Confucian-Legalist State and Patterns of Chinese History
Chapter 10: Pre-Song Challenges to the Confucian-Legalist Political Framework and Song Responses
Chapter 11: Relations between Nomads and Settled Chinese in History
Chapter 12: Neo-Confucianism and the Advent of a <"Confucian Society>"
Chapter 13: Market Economy under the Confucian-Legalist State
Concluding
Remarks
References
· · · · · · (收起)

读后感

评分☆☆☆☆☆

非常荣幸能被邀请为这部精彩的著作写一份简短的书评。第一次与该书作者见面时，他还是就读于麦吉尔大学的学生，自那时起，我就对他很是钦佩，而今天他对中华文明特质的阐释工作圆满完成，我为他感到高兴。我在本文中的评论只不过是把作者书中所讲的内容又强调了一遍，原因极为...

评分☆☆☆☆☆

【本文节选自《开放时代》2019年第4期。】编者按赵鼎新的英文近著《儒法国家：中国历史的新理论》（The Confucian-Legalist State：A New Theory of Chinese History）自出版以来，广受国内外学界关注，且于2016年荣获美国社会学学会政治社会学分会年度杰出专著奖。本刊曾于2...

评分☆☆☆☆☆

【本文选自《开放时代》2019年第4期】【内容提要】本文旨在对八位欧美历史社会学界领军学者对拙作《儒法国家》的评论作出两点回应：第一点关乎我书中提出的社会变迁理论，第二点关乎我对为什么高度商业化的明清中国不可能自发地产生工业资本主义这一问题作出的回答。通过这两...

评分☆☆☆☆☆

美国学者从进入幼儿园到博士毕业几乎没有接触过中国历史（事实上，典型的美国学生对易洛魁人①的了解比对整个亚洲的了解还要多），这是少有例外的。这种无知导致的一个悲哀的后果便是比较历史社会学家和比较政治学家所构建的理论都不涉及中国。我们的国家形成理论与帝国比较研...

评分☆☆☆☆☆

用户评价

评分☆☆☆☆☆

明天赵老师来学堂做讲座，非常期待，二体地下102。7点开始。欢迎豆友来。

评分☆☆☆☆☆

比较失望。很多部分不是用社会学化的历史学观点，要么就是一锅粥；解决李约瑟问题的解释，跟贾斯汀·林的控制实验说法没区别啊~经常自我矛盾，一边说别人用一套理论来解释盛衰的办法无意义，一边自己要用一套理论来处理长程问题~章节也极不平衡，data少的先秦-汉部分分析了将近300页，之后data多的1800年用不到80页解决，所以还是只能根据证据少的部分做社会学分析，证据多起来以后，就很难处理和解释了（估计也是怕被历史学家捶）~经常根据中学历史水平知识和anecdote来组建论证，最后又开始跟出租司机聊，醉了...前有bring state back in，中有war-driven，后有Gorski的bring religion back in，赵老是要bring ideology back in么？

评分☆☆☆☆☆

目前来看，批评有两点：一个是过于简化的竞争机制，另一个是理想化的社会权力类型。迈克尔曼认为很难给四种社会权力下一个精确的定义并指出运作逻辑，国师给了一套定义，又被劳森指责有以现代观念硬套前现代社会之嫌（比如公-私）。归根结底，这是整体主义方法论和个体主义方法论的矛盾：如果个人相对于社会结构不重要，那么古人能否理解社会学概念工具又有什么关系？正是在这种帕森斯视角下，才有了经济-军事权力偏累积、政治-意识形态权力偏守成的论断，其中经济积累倾向去中心化、军事积累倾向中心化。中国的超稳定结构就是以军事积累塑造帝国疆域（秦），以政治-意识形态权力塑造帝国体制（汉），控制军事权力（文-武）、排斥经济权力（士-商）的结果。框架简洁，矛盾巨多。

评分☆☆☆☆☆

感觉只是把《东周战争》提出的框架用历史细节给补充了而已，仍然是在Tilly和Mann的基础上推进战争在国家的诞生中起的作用。不过这本书赵将重心放在了儒法国家的诞生以及其超稳定结构，从历史学的角度来看没什么新鲜的，但是社会科学重点是要找出分析机制，也是挺无聊的。赵真是在何处都要黑彭慕兰。

评分☆☆☆☆☆

顺便马一个18年的404-合法性的政治