The Confucian-Legalist State pdf epub mobi txt 电子书下载 2025

简体网页||繁体网页

☆☆☆☆☆

出版者:Oxford University Press

作者:Dingxin Zhao

出品人:

页数:472

译者:

出版时间:2015-11-13

价格:USD 85.00

装帧:Hardcover

isbn号码:9780199351732

丛书系列:Oxford Studies in Early Empires

图书标签:

赵鼎新
历史社会学
社会学
政治学
历史
儒法国家
海外中国研究
先秦史
儒法合流
中国传统政治
国家治理
法家思想
儒家思想
古代中国
政治制度
历史哲学
统治术
思想史

下载链接在页面底部

facebook linkedin mastodon messenger pinterest reddit telegram twitter viber vkontakte whatsapp 复制链接

想要找书就要到小美书屋

book.quotespace.org

立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本页

你会得到大惊喜!!

具体描述

In the The Confucian-Legalist State, Dingxin Zhao offers a radically new analysis of Chinese imperial history from the eleventh century BCE to the fall of the Qing dynasty. This study first uncovers the factors that explain how, and why, China developed into a bureaucratic empire under the Qin dynasty in 221 BCE. It then examines the political system that crystallized during the Western Han dynasty, a system that drew on China's philosophical traditions of Confucianism and Legalism. Despite great changes in China's demography, religion, technology, and socioeconomic structures, this Confucian-Legalist political system survived for over two millennia. Yet, it was precisely because of the system's resilience that China, for better or worse, did not develop industrial capitalism as Western Europe did, notwithstanding China's economic prosperity and technological sophistication beginning with the Northern Song dynasty.

In examining the nature of this political system, Zhao offers a new way of viewing Chinese history, one that emphasizes the importance of structural forces and social mechanisms in shaping historical dynamics. As a work of historical sociology, The Confucian-Legalist State aims to show how the patterns of Chinese history were not shaped by any single force, but instead by meaningful activities of social actors which were greatly constrained by, and at the same time reproduced and modified, the constellations of political, economic, military, and ideological forces. This book thus offers a startling new understanding of long-term patterns of Chinese history, one that should trigger debates for years to come among historians, political scientists, and sociologists.

作者简介

Dingxin Zhao is Professor of Sociology at the University of Chicago and the author of several books, including the award-winning Power of Tiananmen (University of Chicago Press, 2001).

目录信息

Preface
A Disclaimer
Maps
Part I. Empirical and Theoretical Considerations
Introduction
Chapter 1: A Theory of Historical Change
Part II. The Historical Background of the Eastern Zhou Dynasty
Chapter 2: The Western Zhou (ca. 1045-771 BCE) Order and Its Decline
Chapter 3: The Historical Setting of Eastern Zhou, an Age of War
Part III. War-driven Dynamism in Eastern Zhou
Chapter 4: The Age of Hegemons (770-546 BCE)
Chapter 5: The Age of Transition (545-420 BCE)
Chapter 6: In the Age of Total War (419-221 BCE): (1) Philosophies and Philosophers
Chapter 7: In the Age of Total War: (2) Absolutism Prevailing
Chapter 8: In the Age of Total War: (3) Qin and the Drive toward Unification
Chapter 9: Western Han and the Advent of the Confucian-Legalist State
Part IV. The Confucian-Legalist State and Patterns of Chinese History
Chapter 10: Pre-Song Challenges to the Confucian-Legalist Political Framework and Song Responses
Chapter 11: Relations between Nomads and Settled Chinese in History
Chapter 12: Neo-Confucianism and the Advent of a <"Confucian Society>"
Chapter 13: Market Economy under the Confucian-Legalist State
Concluding
Remarks
References
· · · · · · (收起)

读后感

评分☆☆☆☆☆

哲学、历史和方法 ——我的回应开放时代2016第五期赵鼎新【内容提要】迈克尔•曼的社会变迁理论在西方学界被认为是宏观历史变迁理论的一个里程碑。在接受了曼的理论的一些合理要素的基础上，笔者在最近出版的《儒法国家：中国历史的新理论》这一著作中提出了一个新的宏观...

评分☆☆☆☆☆

之前觉得秦晖很有说服力，扎实、雄辩。然后看到赵鼎新，感觉好像更厉害，因为他有耀眼的理性的光辉，以及，因此而显得货真价实的正能量（这种货真价实在“御用文人”中难得一见）。但秦晖好像也没错，那这是怎么回事，为什么他们的观点如此不同？于是再回过头去把两人看了又看...

评分☆☆☆☆☆

赵鼎新的新书《儒法国家：中国历史的新理论》（以下简称“赵书”）是一本内容极其丰富的专著。①从时间上说，此书主要检查（examine）了古代中国自西周至西汉的历史，但也延伸到整个古代中国，即19世纪西方列强到达中国之前的中国历史。这本书检查和冲击了学术界、知识界近年来...

评分☆☆☆☆☆

【本文选自《开放时代》2019年第4期】【内容提要】本文旨在对八位欧美历史社会学界领军学者对拙作《儒法国家》的评论作出两点回应：第一点关乎我书中提出的社会变迁理论，第二点关乎我对为什么高度商业化的明清中国不可能自发地产生工业资本主义这一问题作出的回答。通过这两...

评分☆☆☆☆☆

用户评价

评分☆☆☆☆☆

读过中国工业资本主义一章。这学期大家上了赵鼎新教授的课都颇有微词。看来今天社会学的结构功能主义研究方法已经过气，火的还是后现代文化研究那一套。

评分☆☆☆☆☆

明天赵老师来学堂做讲座，非常期待，二体地下102。7点开始。欢迎豆友来。

评分☆☆☆☆☆

顺便马一个18年的404-合法性的政治

评分☆☆☆☆☆

跟原来那篇长文相比多了第一部分的理论交代和第四部分对西汉之后的解释，不过里面的观点这几年零零散散地基本也都听过了。感觉跟史学比有些粗疏，似乎只是把一些挺常见的史料、二手见解在自己的框架内重新解释了一遍。史学当然可以从中学些机制分析的眼光，但先见中的机制和史料还是得通过对话相互修正、达到彼此的平衡吧。不过这么说也许误会了赵鼎新的雄心？历史社会学毕竟是想提出一套社会变迁机制的，因此叙事服从于机制，而非反之。

评分☆☆☆☆☆

感觉只是把《东周战争》提出的框架用历史细节给补充了而已，仍然是在Tilly和Mann的基础上推进战争在国家的诞生中起的作用。不过这本书赵将重心放在了儒法国家的诞生以及其超稳定结构，从历史学的角度来看没什么新鲜的，但是社会科学重点是要找出分析机制，也是挺无聊的。赵真是在何处都要黑彭慕兰。