In the The Confucian-Legalist State, Dingxin Zhao offers a radically new analysis of Chinese imperial history from the eleventh century BCE to the fall of the Qing dynasty. This study first uncovers the factors that explain how, and why, China developed into a bureaucratic empire under the Qin dynasty in 221 BCE. It then examines the political system that crystallized during the Western Han dynasty, a system that drew on China's philosophical traditions of Confucianism and Legalism. Despite great changes in China's demography, religion, technology, and socioeconomic structures, this Confucian-Legalist political system survived for over two millennia. Yet, it was precisely because of the system's resilience that China, for better or worse, did not develop industrial capitalism as Western Europe did, notwithstanding China's economic prosperity and technological sophistication beginning with the Northern Song dynasty.
In examining the nature of this political system, Zhao offers a new way of viewing Chinese history, one that emphasizes the importance of structural forces and social mechanisms in shaping historical dynamics. As a work of historical sociology, The Confucian-Legalist State aims to show how the patterns of Chinese history were not shaped by any single force, but instead by meaningful activities of social actors which were greatly constrained by, and at the same time reproduced and modified, the constellations of political, economic, military, and ideological forces. This book thus offers a startling new understanding of long-term patterns of Chinese history, one that should trigger debates for years to come among historians, political scientists, and sociologists.
Dingxin Zhao is Professor of Sociology at the University of Chicago and the author of several books, including the award-winning Power of Tiananmen (University of Chicago Press, 2001).
《儒法国家》旨在对中国历史的范式进行社会学分析。我用“中国”一词来指代一个随着时间而发生变化的区域。在这一区域中,汉字是书面交流的主要形式,而生活在其中的居民对尽管变动但可认知的文化复合体表现出认同。这也就是中华文明。本书由四部分组成,其中,第一部分由简介...
评分【本文选自《开放时代》2019年第4期】 【内容提要】 本文旨在对八位欧美历史社会学界领军学者对拙作《儒法国家》的评论作出两点回应:第一点关乎我书中提出的社会变迁理论,第二点关乎我对为什么高度商业化的明清中国不可能自发地产生工业资本主义这一问题作出的回答。通过这两...
评分赵鼎新(以下简称“赵”)的《儒法国家:中国历史的新理论》颇具学术雄心,视野宏大,洞察清晰,是一项可观的学术成就。我无法评价其解释中国历史的准确性,只能说该书似乎应当在中国的史学争鸣中占有一席之地。这里,我的评论将侧重于理论方面,尤其将重点关注的是此书理论的...
评分【本文选自《开放时代》2019年第4期】 【内容提要】 本文旨在对八位欧美历史社会学界领军学者对拙作《儒法国家》的评论作出两点回应:第一点关乎我书中提出的社会变迁理论,第二点关乎我对为什么高度商业化的明清中国不可能自发地产生工业资本主义这一问题作出的回答。通过这两...
评分【本文节选自《开放时代》2019年第4期】 编者按 赵鼎新的英文近著《儒法国家:中国历史的新理论》(The Confucian-Legalist State: A New Theory of Chinese History)自出版以来,广受国内外学界关注,且于2016年荣获美国社会学学会政治社会学分会年度杰出专著奖。本刊曾于20...
没有想象中那么好,一流但不是超一流。好话当然可以说很多:宏大历史架构与具体机制操作之间的熟稔勾连,赵本人津津乐道地多因对多果的方法,儒法国家概念本身蕴含的理论概括力和独特的问题意识等。遗憾:过度推论的漏洞仍然没有补上,核心内容没有超越十年前的中文草稿,对曼的理论应用比较机械……
评分顺便马一个18年的404-合法性的政治
评分借标记合法性
评分没有想象中那么好,一流但不是超一流。好话当然可以说很多:宏大历史架构与具体机制操作之间的熟稔勾连,赵本人津津乐道地多因对多果的方法,儒法国家概念本身蕴含的理论概括力和独特的问题意识等。遗憾:过度推论的漏洞仍然没有补上,核心内容没有超越十年前的中文草稿,对曼的理论应用比较机械……
评分其实也没什么新观点......
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有