The Confucian-Legalist State pdf epub mobi txt 电子书下载 2025

简体网页||繁体网页

☆☆☆☆☆

出版者:Oxford University Press

作者:Dingxin Zhao

出品人:

页数:472

译者:

出版时间:2015-11-13

价格:USD 85.00

装帧:Hardcover

isbn号码:9780199351732

丛书系列:Oxford Studies in Early Empires

图书标签:

赵鼎新
历史社会学
社会学
政治学
历史
儒法国家
海外中国研究
先秦史
儒法合流
中国传统政治
国家治理
法家思想
儒家思想
古代中国
政治制度
历史哲学
统治术
思想史

下载链接在页面底部

facebook linkedin mastodon messenger pinterest reddit telegram twitter viber vkontakte whatsapp 复制链接

想要找书就要到小美书屋

book.quotespace.org

立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本页

你会得到大惊喜!!

具体描述

In the The Confucian-Legalist State, Dingxin Zhao offers a radically new analysis of Chinese imperial history from the eleventh century BCE to the fall of the Qing dynasty. This study first uncovers the factors that explain how, and why, China developed into a bureaucratic empire under the Qin dynasty in 221 BCE. It then examines the political system that crystallized during the Western Han dynasty, a system that drew on China's philosophical traditions of Confucianism and Legalism. Despite great changes in China's demography, religion, technology, and socioeconomic structures, this Confucian-Legalist political system survived for over two millennia. Yet, it was precisely because of the system's resilience that China, for better or worse, did not develop industrial capitalism as Western Europe did, notwithstanding China's economic prosperity and technological sophistication beginning with the Northern Song dynasty.

In examining the nature of this political system, Zhao offers a new way of viewing Chinese history, one that emphasizes the importance of structural forces and social mechanisms in shaping historical dynamics. As a work of historical sociology, The Confucian-Legalist State aims to show how the patterns of Chinese history were not shaped by any single force, but instead by meaningful activities of social actors which were greatly constrained by, and at the same time reproduced and modified, the constellations of political, economic, military, and ideological forces. This book thus offers a startling new understanding of long-term patterns of Chinese history, one that should trigger debates for years to come among historians, political scientists, and sociologists.

作者简介

Dingxin Zhao is Professor of Sociology at the University of Chicago and the author of several books, including the award-winning Power of Tiananmen (University of Chicago Press, 2001).

目录信息

Preface
A Disclaimer
Maps
Part I. Empirical and Theoretical Considerations
Introduction
Chapter 1: A Theory of Historical Change
Part II. The Historical Background of the Eastern Zhou Dynasty
Chapter 2: The Western Zhou (ca. 1045-771 BCE) Order and Its Decline
Chapter 3: The Historical Setting of Eastern Zhou, an Age of War
Part III. War-driven Dynamism in Eastern Zhou
Chapter 4: The Age of Hegemons (770-546 BCE)
Chapter 5: The Age of Transition (545-420 BCE)
Chapter 6: In the Age of Total War (419-221 BCE): (1) Philosophies and Philosophers
Chapter 7: In the Age of Total War: (2) Absolutism Prevailing
Chapter 8: In the Age of Total War: (3) Qin and the Drive toward Unification
Chapter 9: Western Han and the Advent of the Confucian-Legalist State
Part IV. The Confucian-Legalist State and Patterns of Chinese History
Chapter 10: Pre-Song Challenges to the Confucian-Legalist Political Framework and Song Responses
Chapter 11: Relations between Nomads and Settled Chinese in History
Chapter 12: Neo-Confucianism and the Advent of a <"Confucian Society>"
Chapter 13: Market Economy under the Confucian-Legalist State
Concluding
Remarks
References
· · · · · · (收起)

读后感

评分☆☆☆☆☆

《儒法国家》旨在对中国历史的范式进行社会学分析。我用“中国”一词来指代一个随着时间而发生变化的区域。在这一区域中，汉字是书面交流的主要形式，而生活在其中的居民对尽管变动但可认知的文化复合体表现出认同。这也就是中华文明。本书由四部分组成，其中，第一部分由简介...

评分☆☆☆☆☆

美国学者从进入幼儿园到博士毕业几乎没有接触过中国历史（事实上，典型的美国学生对易洛魁人①的了解比对整个亚洲的了解还要多），这是少有例外的。这种无知导致的一个悲哀的后果便是比较历史社会学家和比较政治学家所构建的理论都不涉及中国。我们的国家形成理论与帝国比较研...

评分☆☆☆☆☆

赵鼎新的新书《儒法国家：中国历史的新理论》（以下简称“赵书”）是一本内容极其丰富的专著。①从时间上说，此书主要检查（examine）了古代中国自西周至西汉的历史，但也延伸到整个古代中国，即19世纪西方列强到达中国之前的中国历史。这本书检查和冲击了学术界、知识界近年来...

评分☆☆☆☆☆

用户评价

评分☆☆☆☆☆

其实也没什么新观点......

评分☆☆☆☆☆

三星半

评分☆☆☆☆☆

三星半

评分☆☆☆☆☆

太多熟悉套路和课堂讨论过的内容无需重复。感触最深是老赵习惯将大问题和论断裁剪成可巧妙精细论证，却坚持活在文革和广场形塑的近乎偏执的愤世嫉俗中。将简单技巧发挥到极致（如将军队征伐距离标准化再叠加地图形成战争网络观察战国时期有无五国争霸）尽显思维缜密。然文革中抓住工厂间隙和写作组机会大量辛苦读书完成原始积累，八十年代受金观涛刘青峰启发思考中国何处去，典型那一代学人思路，理工转社科具备独特的科学思维和两体系比较优势，进入美国学界却面对全然陌生且日渐僵化的知识积累机制。对文革的庆幸和恐惧，对广场从愤怒到冷静，中国、社运、历史三重学者身份纠结，铸就悲观底色：人一手创造权力社会牢笼，却困不住竞争性与动物性；历史并未命定，多重权力的无意后果却永难控制。悲剧论者最高幸运（或不幸）或在于：他完全意识到这一点。

评分☆☆☆☆☆

跟原来那篇长文相比多了第一部分的理论交代和第四部分对西汉之后的解释，不过里面的观点这几年零零散散地基本也都听过了。感觉跟史学比有些粗疏，似乎只是把一些挺常见的史料、二手见解在自己的框架内重新解释了一遍。史学当然可以从中学些机制分析的眼光，但先见中的机制和史料还是得通过对话相互修正、达到彼此的平衡吧。不过这么说也许误会了赵鼎新的雄心？历史社会学毕竟是想提出一套社会变迁机制的，因此叙事服从于机制，而非反之。