Westerners tend to divide the political world into "good" democracies and "bad" authoritarian regimes. But the Chinese political model does not fit neatly in either category. Over the past three decades, China has evolved a political system that can best be described as "political meritocracy." The China Model seeks to understand the ideals and the reality of this unique political system. How do the ideals of political meritocracy set the standard for evaluating political progress (and regress) in China? How can China avoid the disadvantages of political meritocracy? And how can political meritocracy best be combined with democracy? Daniel Bell answers these questions and more.
Opening with a critique of "one person, one vote" as a way of choosing top leaders, Bell argues that Chinese-style political meritocracy can help to remedy the key flaws of electoral democracy. He discusses the advantages and pitfalls of political meritocracy, distinguishes between different ways of combining meritocracy and democracy, and argues that China has evolved a model of democratic meritocracy that is morally desirable and politically stable. Bell summarizes and evaluates the "China model"—meritocracy at the top, experimentation in the middle, and democracy at the bottom—and its implications for the rest of the world.
A timely and original book that will stir up interest and debate, The China Model looks at a political system that not only has had a long history in China, but could prove to be the most important political development of the twenty-first century.
Daniel A. Bell is Chair Professor of the Schwarzman Scholars program at Tsinghua University in Beijing and director of the Berggruen Institute of Philosophy and Culture. His books include Spirit of Cities, China's New Confucianism, Beyond Liberal Democracy, and East Meets West (all Princeton), and he is the editor of the Princeton-China Series.
自鸦片战争以来,有识之士已经就开始打开眼界观察世界,重新审视传承上千年的封建帝制。面对欧美世界的崛起,特别是俄国、日本君主立宪制的成功,激发了国人对国外新型政体的研究,更激发了国人要求废弃传统封建体制、进行政治体制改革的决心。从清朝末年五大臣出洋学习新政和...
評分“尚贤使能”的理念是春秋时期贵族等级解体的产物。孔子说:贤能政治始于有教无类的说话,然而,在此过程中并不说人人都能同等的能力做出知情的、道德上站的住脚的政治判断。因此,政治体制的重点在于选拔出超水平的领导者做出,正确的,道德的政治决断,基于此,前者认为这样...
評分在讨论任何话题时,总预先把“民主”设置为最优的选择,这本身就是一种不民主的行为。当我们被过度的民主主义宣扬洗脑,自身又缺乏更多元化的认识和认知,那么就不难出现大众中的非少数,盲目地坚持“好的民主,坏的专制”这样过于简单的二元化区分,在复杂的现实社会中更是缺...
評分 評分The China Model The China Model: Political Meritocracy and the Limits of Democracy/ Daniel A. Bell/ Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press/ 2015 Introduction Political thinkers—from Confucius, Plato, and Zhu Xi to John Stuart Mill, Sun Yat-sen, and Walt...
舔狗
评分圍城啊圍城!
评分傳送 http://libgen.io/get.php?md5=51a49bcc7f85ffe78d733230fc886eeb 清華這個教職看來相當重要,否則無法解釋貝淡寜如此走火入魔。討論的東西居然是我和朋友在大二就說爛的玩意
评分plaziti
评分a perfect example of poor scholarship
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美書屋 版权所有