Westerners tend to divide the political world into "good" democracies and "bad" authoritarian regimes. But the Chinese political model does not fit neatly in either category. Over the past three decades, China has evolved a political system that can best be described as "political meritocracy." The China Model seeks to understand the ideals and the reality of this unique political system. How do the ideals of political meritocracy set the standard for evaluating political progress (and regress) in China? How can China avoid the disadvantages of political meritocracy? And how can political meritocracy best be combined with democracy? Daniel Bell answers these questions and more.
Opening with a critique of "one person, one vote" as a way of choosing top leaders, Bell argues that Chinese-style political meritocracy can help to remedy the key flaws of electoral democracy. He discusses the advantages and pitfalls of political meritocracy, distinguishes between different ways of combining meritocracy and democracy, and argues that China has evolved a model of democratic meritocracy that is morally desirable and politically stable. Bell summarizes and evaluates the "China model"—meritocracy at the top, experimentation in the middle, and democracy at the bottom—and its implications for the rest of the world.
A timely and original book that will stir up interest and debate, The China Model looks at a political system that not only has had a long history in China, but could prove to be the most important political development of the twenty-first century.
Daniel A. Bell is Chair Professor of the Schwarzman Scholars program at Tsinghua University in Beijing and director of the Berggruen Institute of Philosophy and Culture. His books include Spirit of Cities, China's New Confucianism, Beyond Liberal Democracy, and East Meets West (all Princeton), and he is the editor of the Princeton-China Series.
贝这本书也算是闻名久已。百闻不如一见,等看完这本书后也算是有了个全面的认识。《贤能政治》这本书乍一听很扯淡,再一看其实没那么扯淡,但最后还是感觉很扯淡。 言归正传。贝的这本书,核心在于评价民主政体下“一人一票”选举领导人和中共的贤能选拔人才这两种方式,以此凸...
评分原刊《东方学刊》,2019年02期。 本文摘选了此次会议中关涉中国历史语境的讨论,分别是先秦时期韩非子对于儒家尚贤传统的批判、由汉到宋以来天理观的转变与政治理想的相应变化,以及革命年代里孙中山与毛泽东对于领导的不同构想,展现了从先秦到近现代,不同时期不同语境中对于...
评分 评分谈到道路选择的问题,中国大陆的人民之前所选择的共产党,选择了走共产主义道路,信奉的是马克思主义学说,就如我们在政治课本上经常读到的:中国的政治体制是非常民主的,与西方国家等伪民主不同,中国的选举不是金钱选举,虽然不是一人一票,但是采取的人民代表选举...
评分加拿大学者贝淡宁(Daniel A. Bell)在其新作《贤能政治》中认为:贤能政治,即所谓用人上的“政治尚贤制”在中国源远流长,比选举民主制更适合这个问题复杂的古老大国。我们就来看看,他说的这个贤能政治究竟是什么。 “尚贤”是所有人才选拔制度的共同追求。选贤任能,关键...
https://www.chinafile.com/reporting-opinion/viewpoint/problem-china-model
评分corruption, ossification, legitimacy 按照老赵的说法就是典型文科生思维,这三个轴不正交啊……
评分https://www.chinafile.com/reporting-opinion/viewpoint/problem-china-model
评分提出的问题不错的。
评分传送 http://libgen.io/get.php?md5=51a49bcc7f85ffe78d733230fc886eeb 清华这个教职看来相当重要,否则无法解释贝淡宁如此走火入魔。讨论的东西居然是我和朋友在大二就说烂的玩意
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有