图书标签: 政治学 贝淡宁 海外中国研究 政治哲学 当代中国 英文原版 自由主义 中国研究
发表于2025-02-02
The China Model pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2025
Westerners tend to divide the political world into "good" democracies and "bad" authoritarian regimes. But the Chinese political model does not fit neatly in either category. Over the past three decades, China has evolved a political system that can best be described as "political meritocracy." The China Model seeks to understand the ideals and the reality of this unique political system. How do the ideals of political meritocracy set the standard for evaluating political progress (and regress) in China? How can China avoid the disadvantages of political meritocracy? And how can political meritocracy best be combined with democracy? Daniel Bell answers these questions and more.
Opening with a critique of "one person, one vote" as a way of choosing top leaders, Bell argues that Chinese-style political meritocracy can help to remedy the key flaws of electoral democracy. He discusses the advantages and pitfalls of political meritocracy, distinguishes between different ways of combining meritocracy and democracy, and argues that China has evolved a model of democratic meritocracy that is morally desirable and politically stable. Bell summarizes and evaluates the "China model"—meritocracy at the top, experimentation in the middle, and democracy at the bottom—and its implications for the rest of the world.
A timely and original book that will stir up interest and debate, The China Model looks at a political system that not only has had a long history in China, but could prove to be the most important political development of the twenty-first century.
Daniel A. Bell is Chair Professor of the Schwarzman Scholars program at Tsinghua University in Beijing and director of the Berggruen Institute of Philosophy and Culture. His books include Spirit of Cities, China's New Confucianism, Beyond Liberal Democracy, and East Meets West (all Princeton), and he is the editor of the Princeton-China Series.
plaziti
评分plaziti
评分corruption, ossification, legitimacy 按照老赵的说法就是典型文科生思维,这三个轴不正交啊……
评分看过作者的cv之后,我觉得他应该是真的相信吧...但不得不承认他的论述过于乐观了,对于贤能政治和儒家思想带有一种莫名的崇拜和信赖。或许这是一个精英主义者对于大众民主的绝望吧。建议与Nathan对他的批评以及他的回应比较阅读。
评分一个外国人,毫无利己的动机,把中国的proagenda事业当作他自己的事业,这是什么精神?
转载自爱思想网http://www.aisixiang.com/data/106267.html 作者按:原载《文史哲》2017年第5期,第5-19页。原题为《通往极权之路——贝淡宁“贤能政治”批判》,刊发时编辑部改为此题。正文中某些地方的原文“极权”亦改为了“前现代”(这不符合本文的原意,笔者已经多次指出...
评分“尚贤使能”的理念是春秋时期贵族等级解体的产物。孔子说:贤能政治始于有教无类的说话,然而,在此过程中并不说人人都能同等的能力做出知情的、道德上站的住脚的政治判断。因此,政治体制的重点在于选拔出超水平的领导者做出,正确的,道德的政治决断,基于此,前者认为这样...
评分 评分“尚贤使能”的理念是春秋时期贵族等级解体的产物。孔子说:贤能政治始于有教无类的说话,然而,在此过程中并不说人人都能同等的能力做出知情的、道德上站的住脚的政治判断。因此,政治体制的重点在于选拔出超水平的领导者做出,正确的,道德的政治决断,基于此,前者认为这样...
评分The China Model pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2025