Tearoom Trade pdf epub mobi txt 電子書 下載2025
Laud Humphreys received his divinity degree from Seabury-Western Theological Seminary and spent fourteen years in the ministry of the Episcopal Church. After returning to graduate school, he received his Ph.D. in sociology from Washington University in 1968. Dr. Humphreys taught at SUNY Albany, Southern Illinois University, and until his death in 1988 was professor of sociology at Pitzer College in Claremont, California.
- 社會學
- LGBTQIA
- 田野調查
- sociology
- ethnography
- 性彆研究
- 想讀的書
- 傳播學
From the time of its first publication, Tearoom Trade engendered controversy. It was also accorded an unusual amount of praise for a first book on a marginal, intentionally self-effacing population by a previously unknown sociologist. The book was quickly recognized as an important, imaginative, and useful contribution to our understanding of "deviant" sexual activity. Describing impersonal, anonymous sexual encounters in public restrooms—"tearooms" in the argot—the book explored the behavior of men whose closet homosexuality was kept from their families and neighbors.
By posing as an initiate, the author was able to engage in systematic observation of homosexual acts in public settings, and later to develop a more complete picture of those involved by interviewing them in their homes, again without revealing their unwitting participation in his study.
This enlarged edition of Tearoom Trade includes the original text, together with a retrospect, written by Nicholas von Hoffman, Irving Louis Horowitz, Lee Rainwater, Donald P. Warwick, and Myron Glazer. The material added includes a perspective on the social scientist at work and the ethical problems to which that work may give rise, along with debate by the book's initial critics and proponents. Humphreys added a postscript and his views on the opinion expressed in the retrospect.
具體描述
讀後感
評分
評分
評分
評分
用戶評價
飽受爭議的一本書，我不太明白為啥作者要“劍走偏鋒”。他在公共衛生間裏的“觀察”等等，完全跟他從警察那裏收集傢庭地址，電話公司那裏收集職業、傢庭住址沒有什麼關係啊（姑且還不談研究倫理）
评分research ethics
评分研究真的需要勇氣，來麵對流言蜚語.....算是用“非道德”的方法詮釋瞭the non-deviant nature of homosexuality，充滿爭議但是無法否定研究的巨大影響. 在得知Humphreys最終齣櫃後不得不再次感嘆社科研究研究到最後都是自我情感和意識的投射......
评分漢弗萊斯寫博士論文的精神還真是值得贊揚，前前後後花瞭3年多的時間觀察公共廁所中的同性戀行為。利用情景中的社會結構，將自己作為同性行為的第三人（watchqueen），經常齣入公共廁所，在適當的時機扮演旁觀者。而且，為瞭深入地研究這些發生同性行為的人，偷偷記下他們的車牌號碼，通過警察局、電信局找到這些人的住址，並以另外一個研究的名義來對這些人進行社會學調查。從而引發瞭社會學研究對於研究倫理的討論。反正我是覺得他為瞭做研究，侵犯瞭彆人的隱私，違背瞭研究倫理道德。
评分研究真的需要勇氣，來麵對流言蜚語.....算是用“非道德”的方法詮釋瞭the non-deviant nature of homosexuality，充滿爭議但是無法否定研究的巨大影響. 在得知Humphreys最終齣櫃後不得不再次感嘆社科研究研究到最後都是自我情感和意識的投射......
相關圖書
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息，本站不存儲任何數據與內容，任何內容與數據均與本站無關，如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美書屋 版权所有