Between 1751 and 1784, the Qianlong emperor embarked upon six southern tours, travelling from Beijing to Jiangnan and back. These tours were exercises in political theatre that took the Manchu emperor through one of the Qing empire's most prosperous regions. This study elucidates the tensions and the constant negotiations characterising the relationship between the imperial centre and Jiangnan, which straddled the two key provinces of Jiangsu and Zhejiang. Politically, economically and culturally, Jiangnan was the undisputed centre of the Han Chinese world; it also remained a bastion of Ming loyalism and anti-Manchu sentiment. How did the Qing court constitute its authority and legitimate its domination over this pivotal region? What were the precise terms and historical dynamics of Qing rule over China proper during the long 18th Century? In the course of addressing such questions, this study also explores the political culture within and through which High Qing rule was constituted and contested by a range of actors, all of whom operated within socially and historically structured contexts. The author argues that the southern tours occupied a central place in the historical formation of Qing rule during a period of momentous change affecting all strata of the 18th-Century polity.
张勉治(Michael G.Chang),美国乔治梅森大学历史与艺术史系副教授。加州大学圣迭哥分校历史学博士,师从周锡瑞、高彦颐等中国史研究名家。主要研究领域为16至19世纪中国的政治、社会、文化和经济,目前主要关注盛清时期的政治文化和物质文化。
“吾临御五十年,凡举二大事,一曰西师,一曰南巡。”[1]南巡,这个被乾隆帝视为关系帝国整体战略的重大事件,这个被民间津津乐道的传奇,在学术界却鲜有人系统研究,直到美国学者张勉治(Michael Chang)[2]《马背上的王朝:巡幸与清朝统治的构建,1680-1785》一书推出。如果...
评分 评分译后记中一处疏漏之处 董建中:我清楚地记得,曾问过他,你准备怎么写你的论文?他的回答是:还不知道呢,先收集材料再说。我还记得他说,希望能写本像史景迁《叫魂》那样的书。 史景迁写《叫魂》?让孔飞力跟谁急去?是张先生还是董先生? 此处是一口误,但我们可以确认一点,...
评分 评分找材料的能力好于运用和解读材料的能力。
评分本书关注焦点是乾隆帝的六次南巡,但是把其置于清代帝王巡幸的大背景中进行考察,强调南巡对于满族身份构建以及族性维持的意义,其关于乾隆帝南巡诗的分析尤其值得称道,展现一代帝王对于江南以及满族传统的矛盾复杂情绪。但是其对韦伯的“patrimonialism”却不加批判的接受,让人费解。
评分把南巡按照族群-王朝双重意识形态影响的轴线拆解为历史上的巡游、列祖列宗与巡游、军事化特征、对旗人的检阅、对汉人商业精英和文人精英的分治、皇帝对自己巡游目的的建构、最后两次南巡的特殊语境等多个问题,共同构成南巡所展示的“军事+族群+勤政”的“马上治天下”面貌,进而讨论南巡与西师相并列(虽然并非真正的战争)的政治意义。应该算是第一次正面讨论帝国意识形态的构成部分,特别是强调了军事元素、效忠关系不止是在“族群关系”框架里发挥作用,而是族群-王朝的双重意识形态,很有见地。利用南巡诗及其产生情景、阅读对象来分析乾隆帝的矛盾与多面性,有些书生之见,但也算方法上的突破。缺点:啰嗦;没有分析南巡的印象如何在晚出文本记载中变成了铺张浪费;patrimonial一词含义模糊(没有谈家族联系问题)。
评分本书关注焦点是乾隆帝的六次南巡,但是把其置于清代帝王巡幸的大背景中进行考察,强调南巡对于满族身份构建以及族性维持的意义,其关于乾隆帝南巡诗的分析尤其值得称道,展现一代帝王对于江南以及满族传统的矛盾复杂情绪。但是其对韦伯的“patrimonialism”却不加批判的接受,让人费解。
评分禁芜逸的概念史诠释很有意思
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有