Statesmen and Gentlemen is an important study of the way in which, during the twelfth- and thirteenth-centuries, China's ruling meritocracy was transformed into a locally rooted elite whose principal aim was the consolidation of their power, wealth and influence on a local as opposed to a national and dynastic basis. Professor Hymes offers a remarkable picture of the institutional and social changes this process entailed, but he also examines in detail the subtle ways in which the elite's perception of itself and its social role changed and it came to offer powerful support to local self-defence, social welfare, religious cults and temple-building.
宋史研究能否像明清史研究那樣進入地方史的層面?robert hymes這本書很好地囬答了這個問題:不僅可能,而且可以很漂亮。這就是這本書最重要的貢獻與意義。 怎樣進入一個地方行政區域,在該地紛繁蕪雜的史料載記裡摸爬滾打,並且看出端倪?這本書給出了一些章法:關注科舉、家族...
評分ROBERT P. HYMES. Statesmen and Gentlemen: the Elite of Fu-chou, Chiang-hsi, in Northern and Southern Sung. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1986. pp. xv, 379. Through his investigation of Fu-chou from the Northern to Southern Sung dynasties, Hym...
評分ROBERT P. HYMES. Statesmen and Gentlemen: the Elite of Fu-chou, Chiang-hsi, in Northern and Southern Sung. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1986. pp. xv, 379. Through his investigation of Fu-chou from the Northern to Southern Sung dynasties, Hym...
評分宋史研究能否像明清史研究那樣進入地方史的層面?robert hymes這本書很好地囬答了這個問題:不僅可能,而且可以很漂亮。這就是這本書最重要的貢獻與意義。 怎樣進入一個地方行政區域,在該地紛繁蕪雜的史料載記裡摸爬滾打,並且看出端倪?這本書給出了一些章法:關注科舉、家族...
評分宋史研究能否像明清史研究那樣進入地方史的層面?robert hymes這本書很好地囬答了這個問題:不僅可能,而且可以很漂亮。這就是這本書最重要的貢獻與意義。 怎樣進入一個地方行政區域,在該地紛繁蕪雜的史料載記裡摸爬滾打,並且看出端倪?這本書給出了一些章法:關注科舉、家族...
上次問作者什麼時候能翻譯引進(中國),他說“Nope”
评分宋明readings
评分非常有說服力的論證。可能科舉相關部分稍微有些不贊同(比較偏嚮黃老師的科舉社會)。總體來說確實奠定瞭一個方嚮吧。現在做地方還是要看作者分齣來的七大類人,真的很厲害。
评分hymes成名作。大學時候讀過,為瞭論文再看一遍。與當初印象無異。可見我對local community studies無愛其來有自。整個argument建基在對cracke的批評之上。然而剃人頭者人亦剃其頭。要之亦不免以偏概全之病也。
评分治社會史者當如是~
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美書屋 版权所有