Culture, Power, and the State pdf epub mobi txt 電子書 下載2025
Prasenjit Duara is Director of the Asia Research Institute at National University of Singapore.
- 海外中國研究
- 杜贊奇
- 曆史
- 社會學
- 中國研究
- 文化
- PrasenjitDuara
- Duara
In the early twentieth century, the Chinese state made strenuous efforts to broaden and deepen its authority over rural society. This book is an ambitious attempt to offer both a method and a framework for analyzing Chinese social history in the state-making era.The author constructs a prismatic view of village-level society that shows how marketing, kinship, water control, temple patronage, and other structures of human interaction overlapped to form what he calls the cultural nexus of power in local society. The author's concept of the cultural nexus and his tracing of how it was altered enables us for the first time to grapple with change at the village level in all its complexity.The author asserts that the growth of the state transformed and delegitimized the traditional cultural nexus during the Republican era, particularly in the realm of village leadership and finances. Thus, the expansion of state power was ultimately and paradoxically responsible for the revolution in China as it eroded the foundations of village life, leaving nothing in its place.The problems of state-making in China were different from those of eighteenth- and nineteenth-century Europe; the Chinese experience heralds the process that would become increasingly common in the emergent states of the developing world under the very different circumstances of the twentieth century.
具體描述
讀後感
《Culture,Power,and the State:Rural North China,1900—1942》 Prasenjit Duara 这本书获得了1989年度的“美国历史学会费正清奖”以及1990年度的“亚洲研究学会列文森奖”。本书通过对华北地区的六个村庄的宗族、宗教、村庄领袖的结构与变迁、国家政权的扩张及...
評分中国共产党是通过阶级理论，即地主与农民这样的二元关系来建构农村，并由此展开对农村的建设。在阶级论述达到极致的情况下，“地主土豪”是一个连用的词。 不少社会学家认识到了乡绅阶层是连接国家政权和农民的重要纽带。特别是在帝国时期，中国的官僚体系只延伸到...
評分 評分20世纪上半叶的中国，在遭受西方入侵的同时，还发生着另一件也许意义更深远的历史事件，即国家政权逐步加强其对乡村社会的控制。 这一进程始于清末新政，它类似于Tilly所谓的“国家政权建设”（state-making），而不同于“民族形成”（nation building）过程。但是与欧洲不...
評分用戶評價
it seems very trendy to criticize a model/paradigm focusing too much on “consistency” and neglecting “culture”…It seems we can modify everything by pointing out there are contested/negotiated symbols…
评分感覺杜贊奇很多的觀點和Koselleck的觀念史研究方法是有相似的。
评分deeply appreciated.
评分cultural nexus of power, broker system (protective and entrepreneur), state involution (from Clifford Geertz's agricultural involution in Java)
评分獨立的基土文化和內嚮性的問題的嚴重性可能是一個很根本的問題，畢竟，濛古和基督兩大現象，近代以來的外來徵伐，北元滿清的遺留也好，算是曆史的背負吧，被迫采取瞭這麼個過於獨立和內縮的一個治理生態和心靈秩序，對廟堂和國傢概念的疏離甚之又甚，大概念，大祭司，大民族，大夢想之下，這些小小堅韌的自我持守反而顯得有力量，不是一個獨立的現象，曆史上是沒有人的，具體的大傢的焚燒的生活自己野蠻的生長成瞭這個樣子，我覺得還是要對書本上的河，天上的光，暫時放下，從土地筆直的穿過去，他們會感動，他們會真誠，他們也渴求一個現代的可愛生活，但是曆史背負和政權質量讓他們難以輕鬆舞蹈
相關圖書
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息，本站不存儲任何數據與內容，任何內容與數據均與本站無關，如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美書屋 版权所有