Seeing Like a State

Seeing Like a State pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2025

出版者:Yale University Press
作者:James C. Scott
出品人:
页数:464
译者:
出版时间:1999-2-8
价格:USD 21.00
装帧:Paperback
isbn号码:9780300078152
丛书系列:
图书标签:
  • 社会学
  • 人类学
  • 政治学
  • 政治
  • politics
  • James_Scott
  • Anthropology
  • 比较政治
  • 权力
  • 控制
  • 现代性
  • 国家
  • 意识形态
  • 治理
  • 技术
  • 社会
  • 制度
  • 监视
想要找书就要到 小美书屋
立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本页
你会得到大惊喜!!

具体描述

Compulsory ujamaa villages in Tanzania, collectivization in Russia, Le Corbusier's urban planning theory realized in Brasilia, the Great Leap Forward in China, agricultural "modernization" in the Tropics -- the twentieth century has been racked by grand utopian schemes that have inadvertently brought death and disruption to millions. Why do well-intentioned plans for improving the human condition go tragically awry? In this wide-ranging and original book, James C. Scott analyzes failed cases of large-scale authoritarian plans in a variety of fields. Centrally managed social plans misfire, Scott argues, when they impose schematic visions that do violence to complex interdependencies that are not -- and cannot -- be fully understood. Further, the success of designs for social organization depends upon the recognition that local, practical knowledge is as important as formal, epistemic knowledge. The author builds a persuasive case against "development theory" and imperialistic state planning that disregards the values, desires, and objections of its subjects. He identifies and discusses four conditions common to all planning disasters: administrative ordering of nature and society by the state; a "high-modernist ideology" that places confidence in the ability of science to improve every aspect of human life; a willingness to use authoritarian state power to effect large-scale interventions; and a prostrate civil society that cannot effectively resist such plans. "A broad-ranging, theoretically important, and empirically grounded treatment of the modern state and its propensity to simplify and make legible a society which by nature is complex and opaque. For anyone interested inlearning about this fundamental tension of modernity and about the destruction wrought in the twentieth century as a consequence of the dominant development ideology of the simplifying state, this is a must-read". -- Daniel Jonah Goldhagen, author of Hitler's Willing Executioners

作者简介

James C. Scott is the Eugene Meyer Professor of Political Science and Anthropology at Yale University and current president of the Association of Asian Studies. He is the author of Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance, Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts, and The Moral Economy of the Peasant: Rebellion and Subsistence in Southeast Asia, all published by Yale University Press.

目录信息

读后感

评分

先从从林业、赋税、土地制度、度量衡、姓氏、城市规划、革命、集体农业的具体案例谈大型规划中的极端现代主义,然后回到认识论谈地方性知识/实践知识。 如书名所说,确实是“国家的视角”,主要从剖析规划者为什么以及如何执迷于清晰化和规整化,但Scott其实也有讲不少来自“规...  

评分

据说对技术的批评从老子就开始了,前卫的老子成为了两千年后与海德格尔遥相呼应的素心人,而中间这段浩浩荡荡的时间光谱里,只要你想得出,尽可以把姓氏字母从A到Z的人塞进去。不信?18世纪以来,仅举以B开头的——以赛亚•伯林(Isaiah Berlin),齐格蒙特•鲍曼(Zygmunt...  

评分

此文为笔者大一年级就读于行政管理专业的读书笔记,其中观点多有偏颇之处,有待指正。 “国家的简单化带有地图的特点,也就是说,它们被设计出来的目的只在于精确地概括复杂世界中地图绘制者最感兴趣的那些方面,而忽略其他方面。”作者在第二部分开头的这个隐喻给我留下了极为...  

评分

【摘要】斯科特在《国家的视角》中呈现了现代科学与理性主义哲学所构成的“现代知识”与不断强化自身权力的“现代国家”的共谋促成了“极端现代主义”计划的制订与实施。然而,简单化和清晰化的“国家的视角”无法真正认清社会的本来面目,从而导致计划的最终失败。此外,“极...  

评分

这本书其实我很早就买了,一直搁着没有阅读,主要是基于三个原因:一方面,政治社会学(虽然作者认为自己是一个政治人类学家,他的很多作品确实是非常经典的政治人类学探讨,但我始终认为这是一部政治社会学作品,甚至社会学的痕迹都值得商榷)毕竟是我的“副业”;另一方面,...  

用户评价

评分

城市规划和苏联集体化两章很精彩,最后对metis的强调不仅话痨,而且跑题。因为政治权力推行的high modernism是多种不同的意识形态,既未必涉及知识,也未必是为了改善人类状况。这不是认识论缺陷导致的失察,而是政治斗争的结果。(全书莫名话痨,可能为了强化一种metis吧。)

评分

专注质疑国家三十年,惜略失水准。并非反对一切国家干预和科学知识,主要是在发展型国家/强国家理论热潮过后,剖析特殊情境中特殊政策和话语组合:革命和后殖民提供急切发展和管理要求,科学主义、乌托邦意识形态、强国家和弱小市民社会组合中,移植西方经验的发展政策以满足国家抽税便利和政策简便为优先,过分切削本地知识和社会纽带造成不良后果;但过分强调传统守护和自身发展潜力,似低估本地知识和纽带转变以适应规划的能力。认识论上怀疑社科削减历史偶发性的努力,将国家官僚机器的行政手段、科学规划和市场经济价格机制的简化作用混为一谈,过于简单。或许过分受偏远地区田野经验、人类学视角和农业经济为重点的限制,对工业、科学和农业更多强调其潜在负面性而忽略其灵活性。提出的开放性制度和尊重本地知识、社会纽带,大概已成为共识。

评分

phenomenal! fantastic! High recommended if you are interested in the underlying ideologies supporting the authoritarian state-lead utopian project. But personally, a romanticizing vision of metis is also dangerous to perpetuate the disastrous outcomes brought by those autocracies.

评分

非常渴望了解的话题,可是书却让人非常看不下去。。。

评分

三星半。略失望。主要论点拎出来之后,基本上就没有亮点了。

本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度google,bing,sogou

© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有