Catch-22 is like no other novel. It is one of the funniest books ever written, a keystone work in American literature, and even added a new term to the dictionary.
At the heart of Catch-22 resides the incomparable, malingering bombardier, Yossarian, a hero endlessly inventive in his schemes to save his skin from the horrible chances of war. His efforts are perfectly understandable because as he furiously scrambles, thousands of people he hasn't even met are trying to kill him. His problem is Colonel Cathcart, who keeps raising the number of missions the men must fly to complete their service. Yet if Yossarian makes any attempts to excuse himself from the perilous missions that he is committed to flying, he is trapped by the Great Loyalty Oath Crusade, the hilariously sinister bureaucratic rule from which the book takes its title: a man is considered insane if he willingly continues to fly dangerous combat missions, but if he makes the necessary formal request to be relieved of such missions, the very act of making the request proves that he is sane and therefore ineligible to be relieved.
Catch-22 is a microcosm of the twentieth-century world as it might look to some one dangerously sane -- a masterpiece of our time.
There was a time when reading Joseph Heller's classic satire on the murderous insanity of war was nothing less than a rite of passage. Echoes of Yossarian, the wise-ass bombardier who was too smart to die but not smart enough to find a way out of his predicament, could be heard throughout the counterculture. As a result, it's impossible not to consider Catch-22 to be something of a period piece. But 40 years on, the novel's undiminished strength is its looking-glass logic. Again and again, Heller's characters demonstrate that what is commonly held to be good, is bad; what is sensible, is nonsense.
Yossarian says, "You're talking about winning the war, and I am talking about winning the war and keeping alive."
"Exactly," Clevinger snapped smugly. "And which do you think is more important?"
"To whom?" Yossarian shot back. "It doesn't make a damn bit of difference who wins the war to someone who's dead."
"I can't think of another attitude that could be depended upon to give greater comfort to the enemy."
"The enemy," retorted Yossarian with weighted precision, "is anybody who's going to get you killed, no matter which side he's on."
Mirabile dictu, the book holds up post-Reagan, post-Gulf War. It's a good thing, too. As long as there's a military, that engine of lethal authority, Catch-22 will shine as a handbook for smart-alecky pacifists. It's an utterly serious and sad, but damn funny book.
約瑟夫·海勒(1923一),美國黑色幽默派代錶作傢,齣生於紐約市布魯剋林一個猶太移民傢庭。第二次世界大戰期間曾任空軍中尉。戰後進大學學習,1948年畢業於紐約大學。1949年在哥倫比亞大學獲文學碩士學位後,得到富布賴特研究基金赴英國牛津大學深造一年。1950到1952年在賓夕法尼亞州立大學等校任教。此後即離開學校,到《時代》和《展望》等雜誌編輯部任職。1961年,長篇小說《第二十二條軍規》問世,一舉成名,當年即放棄職務,專門從事寫作。
除《第二十二條軍規》外,海勒還發錶過長篇小說兩部:《齣瞭毛病》(1974)和《像高爾德一樣好》(1979)。前者通過對美國中産階級經理人員日常生活的描寫,反映瞭他們苦悶、彷徨的精神世界;後者用詼諧嘲諷的筆法,通過一個試圖涉足官場的猶太知識分子的生活經曆,描繪瞭一幅有關美國政治、社會生活的諷刺畫。海勒也曾寫過劇本,如《我們轟炸瞭紐黑文》等,但影響不大。
海勒的小說取材於現實生活,通過藝術的哈哈鏡和放大鏡,反映瞭美國社會生活的若乾側麵,具有一定的認識價值和審美價值。當然,他的作品也帶有黑色幽默派文學的一些通病,如對社會現實流露齣無可奈何的心情等。
《不管三七二十一》 -再讀約瑟夫•海勒的《第二十二条軍規》 假如漫長歷史與浩瀚地理可以合一;假如生於大明萬歷卒於大清順治後來被譽為話本小說、戲曲、民謠皆獨具成就的文學家-蘇州人馮夢龍,與紐約布魯克林區的猶太移民後裔、二戰時期的美國空軍中尉後來成了美國黑色幽...
評分"这可是实实在在的一见钟情",约瑟夫·海勒用这句话描述约塞连狂热地恋上了随军牧师。而我在这一句开场爱上了约瑟夫·海勒。当然,这里面有个圈套。正如科恩中校所说。 关于其中的荒诞和无可救药的莫名奇妙,我就不一一叙述了,直接去文字/生活中去寻找黑色给你的快感吧...
評分在看这本书之前,我就听说过它大名鼎鼎的“第二十二条军规”理论——根据第二十二条军规,只有疯子才能获准免于飞行,但必须由本人提出申请,但你一旦提出申请,恰好证明了你是一个正常人,还是在劫难逃。第二十二条军规还规定,飞行员飞满25架次就能回国,但它又说,你必须绝...
評分【约塞连】 在全书的前半,约塞连都是个插科打诨、胆小如鼠、脾气暴躁、好逸恶劳的家伙。他唯一的优点或许就是异乎寻常地清醒:在战争面前。 “只有少数人甘愿牺牲生命以赢得这场战争,而他并不奢望跻身其间。” “奢望”这个词用得妙:约塞连自己都清楚,他不是扛得起崇高的爱...
評分"这可是实实在在的一见钟情",约瑟夫·海勒用这句话描述约塞连狂热地恋上了随军牧师。而我在这一句开场爱上了约瑟夫·海勒。当然,这里面有个圈套。正如科恩中校所说。 关于其中的荒诞和无可救药的莫名奇妙,我就不一一叙述了,直接去文字/生活中去寻找黑色给你的快感吧...
全是瘋子
评分思辨性也太強瞭吧!
评分戰爭的荒謬與怪誕
评分funny as hell, sad as hell
评分思辨性也太強瞭吧!
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美書屋 版权所有