布尔迪厄(1930-2002),当代法国著名思想家、社会学家。主要著作有《实践理论纲要》《国家精英:名牌大学与群体精神》《再生产》《艺术的法则》《区分:判断力的社会批判》。在这些著作中,布尔迪厄借助其“习性”、“资本”、“场”等概念,对资本主义社会进行了深刻的批判。
译者
刘晖,1970年生,法国文学博士,中国社会科学院外国文学研究所副研究员。译著有《色情史》《艺术的法则》《男性统治》《帕斯卡尔式的沉思》《自我分析纲要》等。
No judgement of taste is innocent. In a word, we are all snobs. Pierre Bourdieu brilliantly illuminates this situation of the middle class in the modern world. France's leading sociologist focusses here on the French bourgeoisie, its tastes and preferences. Distinction is at once a vast ethnography of contemporary France and a dissection of the bourgeois mind. In the course of everyday life people constantly choose between what they find aesthetically pleasing and what they consider tacky, merely trendy, or ugly. Bourdicu bases his study on surveys that took into account the multitude of social factors that play a part in a Frenchperson's choice of clothing, furniture, leisure activities, dinner menus for guests, and many other matters of taste. What emerges from his analysis is that social snobbery is everywhere in the bourgeois world. The different aesthetic choices people make are all distinctions-that is, choices made in opposition to those made by other classes. Taste is not pure. Bourdieu finds a world of social meaning in the decision to order bouillabaisse, in our contemporary cult of thinness, in the "California sports" such as jogging and cross-country skiing. The social world, he argues, functions simultaneously as a system of power relations and as a symbolic system in which minute distinctions of taste become the basis for social judgement. The topic of Bourdieu's book is a fascinating one: the strategies of social pretension are always curiously engaging. But the book is more than fascinating. It is a major contribution to current debates on the theory of culture and a challenge to the major theoretical schools in contemporary sociology.
装逼当然有罪,布尔迪厄说。 如果装逼无罪,为什么艺术审美的敏感度总是被分给一小撮名流? 如果装逼无罪,为什么鄙视链的头尾顺序要由老布尔乔亚阶级决定? 如果装逼无罪,为什么需要付出精力和金钱的爱好总是比廉价大众的要牛逼? 如果装逼无罪,为什么艰深难懂的,模糊无可...
评分看完Bourdieu的《The Love of Art》以及《Distinction》,首先先想到的是拿康德的三大批判来对比Bourdieu的架构,因为两者思考结构以及出发点并没有太大的差异,所以用kant的结构来作为基底评述其实是某种偷懒的方法。Bourdieu首先承袭了理性批判的时空形式,然后依据历史的时...
评分皮埃尔·布尔迪厄(Pierre Bourdieu,1930-2002),乡村邮递员的儿子,早年生活在偏远的西南农村并说一口方言,充分“体验到了社会不平等和社会统治。”幸亏他异常聪颖并且勤奋,也幸亏有那么一所不重门第只看成绩的巴黎高等师范学院,使得他得以通过考试这个跳板,从底层社...
评分社会学家都是一等聪明人。不过,坏的社会学家是一流的理论创造者;好的社会学家是一流的观察者。坏社会学家构造出新理论,特别是令人费解的新理论,其实带来的价值还比不上带来的浪费时间;好社会学家观察社会,通过自己的机敏得出一些含金量很高的结论。 但必须要注意,社会学...
研究生导师是一个极其严苛的美国博士,这本书是他highly recommend,当时就明白,如果不把这本书整进论文里,肯定会挂!当时为了写好毕业论文,在公交车和地铁上都捧着这本书 使劲啃啊。现在想想,这可能是当时那年里遇到的最精彩的一本书吧。
评分标记。thus spake pocahontas. 拗口长句子。
评分看的出来既有涂尔干social facts也有韦伯class and status对文化资本概念的影响。
评分豆瓣应该添加一个翻过一栏,可以给这种只看前言后记和某些篇章的用。。taste就是self-distinguishing用的,而且taste都是对于其他taste的distaste和intolerance,pure gaze和naive gaze区别就在于pure gaze 自我materialize了
评分不知道是不是法文原文就这么佶屈聱牙,英文翻译的行文真是看得人牙疼。但是书也真是经典又精彩。年轻的时候最憎恨阶级分析,这些年越来越觉得最终的最终都逃不过阶级与阶层。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有