No judgement of taste is innocent. In a word, we are all snobs. Pierre Bourdieu brilliantly illuminates this situation of the middle class in the modern world. France's leading sociologist focusses here on the French bourgeoisie, its tastes and preferences. Distinction is at once a vast ethnography of contemporary France and a dissection of the bourgeois mind. In the course of everyday life people constantly choose between what they find aesthetically pleasing and what they consider tacky, merely trendy, or ugly. Bourdicu bases his study on surveys that took into account the multitude of social factors that play a part in a Frenchperson's choice of clothing, furniture, leisure activities, dinner menus for guests, and many other matters of taste. What emerges from his analysis is that social snobbery is everywhere in the bourgeois world. The different aesthetic choices people make are all distinctions-that is, choices made in opposition to those made by other classes. Taste is not pure. Bourdieu finds a world of social meaning in the decision to order bouillabaisse, in our contemporary cult of thinness, in the "California sports" such as jogging and cross-country skiing. The social world, he argues, functions simultaneously as a system of power relations and as a symbolic system in which minute distinctions of taste become the basis for social judgement. The topic of Bourdieu's book is a fascinating one: the strategies of social pretension are always curiously engaging. But the book is more than fascinating. It is a major contribution to current debates on the theory of culture and a challenge to the major theoretical schools in contemporary sociology.
布尔迪厄(1930-2002),当代法国著名思想家、社会学家。主要著作有《实践理论纲要》《国家精英:名牌大学与群体精神》《再生产》《艺术的法则》《区分:判断力的社会批判》。在这些著作中,布尔迪厄借助其“习性”、“资本”、“场”等概念,对资本主义社会进行了深刻的批判。
译者
刘晖,1970年生,法国文学博士,中国社会科学院外国文学研究所副研究员。译著有《色情史》《艺术的法则》《男性统治》《帕斯卡尔式的沉思》《自我分析纲要》等。
装逼当然有罪,布尔迪厄说。 如果装逼无罪,为什么艺术审美的敏感度总是被分给一小撮名流? 如果装逼无罪,为什么鄙视链的头尾顺序要由老布尔乔亚阶级决定? 如果装逼无罪,为什么需要付出精力和金钱的爱好总是比廉价大众的要牛逼? 如果装逼无罪,为什么艰深难懂的,模糊无可...
评分看完Bourdieu的《The Love of Art》以及《Distinction》,首先先想到的是拿康德的三大批判来对比Bourdieu的架构,因为两者思考结构以及出发点并没有太大的差异,所以用kant的结构来作为基底评述其实是某种偷懒的方法。Bourdieu首先承袭了理性批判的时空形式,然后依据历史的时...
评分 评分 评分虽然自己没有读布迪厄的这本英文版的区隔,但最近两周罗卡的课一直在讲这本书,今天连彬更是很详细地讲了这本书的前半部分的内容。他里面主要是讲文化资本、经济资本二者所形成的社会结构对于个人的品味的塑造,不同阶级、不同阶层对于食物、文化与自我呈现的选择显示出非常大...
说明了为什么结婚要门当户对为什么人有钱开始装逼。金卡瑞模仿有钱人的笑就看出来了。也许一切根本就是这浮华的社会环境造成的。
评分图片很鲜活啊!期盼中译
评分人类学家读outline,社会学家看distinction,互相辅助才好。
评分看的出来既有涂尔干social facts也有韦伯class and status对文化资本概念的影响。
评分说明了为什么结婚要门当户对为什么人有钱开始装逼。金卡瑞模仿有钱人的笑就看出来了。也许一切根本就是这浮华的社会环境造成的。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有