In "The Sleepwalkers" acclaimed historian and author of Iron Kingdom, Christopher Clark, examines the causes of the First World War. Sunday Times Books of the Year 2012. The moments that it took Gavrilo Princip to step forward to the stalled car and shoot dead Franz Ferdinand and his wife were perhaps the most fateful of the modern era. An act of terrorism of staggering efficiency, it fulfilled its every aim: it would liberate Bosnia from Habsburg rule and it created a powerful new Serbia, but it also brought down four great empires, killed millions of men and destroyed a civilization. What made a seemingly prosperous and complacent Europe so vulnerable to the impact of this assassination? In "The Sleepwalkers" Christopher Clark retells the story of the outbreak of the First World War and its causes. Drawing on many fresh new sources, this account reveals a Europe very different from the familiar picture, putting Serbia and the Balkans at the centre of the story. Starting with the brutal assassination of Alexander I of Serbia in 1903, Clark shows how, far from being the place of enviable stability it appears to us, Europe was racked by chronic problems: a multipolar, fractured, multicultural world of clashing ideals, terrorism, militancy and instability, which was, fatefully, saddled with a conspicuously ineffectual set of political leaders. He shows how the rulers of Europe, who prided themselves on their modernity and rationalism, behaved like sleepwalkers, stumbling through crisis after crisis and finally convincing themselves that war was the only answer. Reviews: "Formidable ...one of the most impressive and stimulating studies of the period ever published". (Max Hastings, "Sunday Times"). "The arguments [Clark] sets out in this quite superb account of the causes of the First World War are so compelling that they effectively consign the old historical consensus to the bin ...a masterpiece. It's not often that one has the privilege of reading a book that reforges our understanding of one of the seminal events of world history". ("Mail Online"). "Impeccably researched, provocatively argued and elegantly written, his book is a model of scholarship". ("Sunday Times", Books of the Year 2012). "A brilliant contribution". ("Times Higher Education"). "Clark is fully alive to the challenges of the subject. Planting himself at the contingent end of the spectrum, he prefers to establish how the war happened rather than to explain why by means of hindsight ...It is a refreshing approach. He provides vivid portraits of leading figures ...[He] also gives a rich sense of what contemporaries believed was at stake in the crises leading up to the war". ("Irish Times"). About the author: Christopher Clark is Professor of Modern History at the University of Cambridge and a Fellow of St Catharine's College. He is the author of "The Politics of Conversion", "Kaiser Wilhelm II" and "Iron Kingdom". Widely praised around the world, "Iron Kingdom" became a major bestseller. He has been awarded the Officer's Cross of the Order of Merit of the Federal Republic of Germany.
Christopher Clark is Professor of Modern History at the University of Cambridge and a Fellow of St Catharine's College. He is the author of The Politics of Conversion, Kaiser Wilhelm II and Iron Kingdom. Widely praised around the world, Iron Kingdom became a major bestseller. He has been awarded the Officer's Cross of the Order of Merit of the Federal Republic of Germany.
历史看似在下很大一盘棋实际上没有什么用(。 走向僵化的体系和一战的促成 小约瑟夫.奈在《理解国际冲突》中,将19世纪的均势体系划分为了五个阶段: 1815-1822的欧洲一致 1822-1854间民族主义和民主革命使国际干涉变得困难 1854-1870由于克里米亚战争和德国统一而更动荡 1870-...
评分“战争开始了。谁也不知道在哪里又是怎样打起来的,但事情就是这样。它就在人们的脑袋后面,如今,它在人的脑袋后面张开了嘴,正喘着气。战争,就是种种罪恶、声声诅咒,是狂怒的目光,是脑海迸发的思想。战争就在这里,展现在世界面前,使其笼罩在它设置的那张电网下。战争时...
评分丘吉尔说过,一战最神秘的就是开头,到底怎么爆发的。传统的观点是,德国蓄意发动了一战。可后来的历史学家大多倾向于认为德国确实最轻率鲁莽,但谈不上有事先的周密计划。 Christopher Clark在 The Sleepwalkers这本书中认为,“一战的爆发是一场悲剧,但不是一桩罪行。”德国...
评分1871年,雄图大略的俾斯麦击败了拿破仑三世,攫取了莱茵河对岸的阿尔萨斯和洛林,留下了法国人的眼泪和我们中学课本中震撼人心的《最后一课》,也播下了德法两国世仇的种子。 20多年后,俾斯麦苦心经营的针对法国的大陆联盟体系逐渐走向瓦解。总是在极度悲观与极度乐观之间游走...
评分作者在400页的篇幅中,以巴尔干半岛的内部局势为引子,逐渐将漩涡扩大到德法俄英四个大国的外交。同时对于孤立事件做到多方面陈述,使得国内纠纷与国际形势很好的结合起来。 一战作为近现代社会第一场大战,诱发的因素很多。虽然萨拉热窝加速了整体进程,但是并不能由此将其作...
一战前的外交风云,大塞尔维亚真惹不起,德皇有点像Trump,但后者在关键时刻为了面子肯定不会chicken out,全篇最尴尬是德国因为Grey的假情报空欢喜,意大利的存在度基本为零
评分D. Stevenson 强推。 是进来对一战起源的讨论中最杰出的一本。作者认为塞尔维亚是个rogue state,迫使奥匈帝国出手。而从七月危机到战争爆发,各国的决策者都采取了危险的行动,有意(奥匈、俄国)使危机升级,而德国领导人并不认为事态严重,但其行动从一开始就纵容了危险行为,加上领导层的混乱,不同设想(见好就收-局部战争)并没有综合成为集体的政策。遇到一个指向欧洲的军事计划,然后就呵呵了。
评分被逼着看了原版。译文读起来白开水一样。奥匈的崩溃是碎片化欧洲的必然。却是一战和二战的诱因之一。但是看这里却在论述奥匈的另一面,还有希望的一面。梦游者其实也有奥匈的一份,做死成功。
评分巴尔干不只是导火索,感谢克拉克带来的东欧视角。另外这本书的德语版本在德国成了畅销书,有效疏解了德国人过度反思历史的自虐倾向,有力地矫正了费舍尔史观。德国历史学家费舍尔和弟子们大包大揽,说一战罪责尽在德国的争霸欲望,以此深究病根以免后人重蹈负责。然而反思也要符合基本法嘛,符合基本史实……你们好心把责任都包揽了,其他国家就没得要反思的了嘛?给别人一点机会~英国人克拉克先生还是中立,对得起历史学家的名号,感谢!本书必读,当然要读英文版而不是辣鸡中文译本。
评分巴尔干不只是导火索,感谢克拉克带来的东欧视角。另外这本书的德语版本在德国成了畅销书,有效疏解了德国人过度反思历史的自虐倾向,有力地矫正了费舍尔史观。德国历史学家费舍尔和弟子们大包大揽,说一战罪责尽在德国的争霸欲望,以此深究病根以免后人重蹈负责。然而反思也要符合基本法嘛,符合基本史实……你们好心把责任都包揽了,其他国家就没得要反思的了嘛?给别人一点机会~英国人克拉克先生还是中立,对得起历史学家的名号,感谢!本书必读,当然要读英文版而不是辣鸡中文译本。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有