For 30 years, Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Linda Greenhouse chronicled the activities of the U.S. Supreme Court and its justices as a correspondent for the New York Times. In this Very Short Introduction, she draws on her deep knowledge of the court's history and of its written and unwritten rules to show readers how the Supreme Court really works. Greenhouse offers a fascinating institutional biography of a place and its people - men and women - who exercise great power but whose names and faces are unrecognized by many Americans and whose work often appears cloaked in mystery. How do cases get to the Supreme Court? How do the justices go about deciding them? What special role does the chief justice play? What do the law clerks do? How does the court relate to the other branches of government? Greenhouse answers these questions by depicting the justices as they confront deep constitutional issues or wrestle with the meaning of confusing federal statutes. Throughout, the author examines many individual Supreme Court cases to illustrate points under discussion, ranging from Marbury v. Madison, the seminal case which established judicial review, to the recent District of Columbia v. Heller (2008), which struck down the District of Columbia's gun-control statute and which was, surprisingly, the first time in its history that the Court issued an authoritative interpretation of the Second Amendment. To add perspective, Greenhouse also compares the Court to foreign courts, revealing interesting differences. For instance, no other country in the world has chosen to bestow life tenure on its judges. A superb overview packed with telling details, this volume offers a matchless introduction to one of the pillars of American government.
Linda Greenhouse began covering the Supreme Court for The New York Times in 1978. With the exception of two years during the mid-1980's, during which she covered Congress, she served as the paper's regular Supreme Court correspondent until 2008. Previously, she covered local and state government and politics for the Times in New York, and was chief of the newspaper's legislative bureau in Albany. She has appeared as a Washington Week panelist since 1980.
She is a graduate of Radcliffe College, where she currently serves on the advisory committee to the Schlesinger Library on the History of American Women. She earned a Master of Studies in Law degree from Yale Law School, and has several honorary degrees.
For her coverage of the Court, she was awarded a Pulitzer Prize in Journalism (beat reporting) in 1998. In 2004, she received the Goldsmith Career Award for Excellence in Journalism from the Kennedy School of Government at Harvard and the John Chancellor Award for Excellence in Journalism from the Annenberg School for Communication at the University of Pennsylvania.
一 “哪位朋友可以说出照片上所有大法官的姓名,我可以送他一本新书。”2013年1月26日,我在北京单向街书店参加一次以“律政剧、法律翻译和司法文化”为主题的讲座。开场时,为了活跃气氛,我亮出美国最高法...
评分《美国最高法院通识读本》,作为“牛津通识读本”中译本的新成员,一望而知是那种微言大义、对书中所及要为专家与白丁一起奔向满分而奋斗的文本,主角又是构成所谓“梦想国度”立国根底之一的那幢“大理石神殿”,免不了叫人先注意到由谁来执笔写作。 本书作者琳达•格林豪...
评分序言 林达/文 记得有一次朋友来聚会。我想起“美国人大多不认识联邦最高法院大法官”的说法,历史上的大法官,大概就更不认识了。我想测试下,就举起书里一张穿西装的照片,遮了名字,开玩笑地问:“这是谁?”我立即得到了毫不迟疑的答案:“厄尔•沃伦!”我特别奇怪,问...
评分《美国最高法院通识读本》,琳达·格林豪斯著,何帆译,译林出版社,2013年7月第1版。 对美国宪法与最高法院感兴趣始自在墨尔本留学期间,还特地选了一门宪法比较。记得图书馆有本厚达6、700页的书,只讲宪法第一修正案。当然,后来知道,这没什么奇怪的,讲这方面的书多了去...
评分阅读美国历史,除不断更迭的总统、争论不休的国会两院外,不那么引人注目但在特定节点总能起着关键作用的,恐怕就是美国最高法院。不过,相比总统大选、国会立法的具体程序,美国最高法院,虽广为人知但其权限、运行机制、法官任期,对多数人来说可能仍是个谜,更何况,最高法...
很短 可以有大概了解但还不够!
评分很短 可以有大概了解但还不够!
评分简明扼要、主旨清晰,读时酣畅淋漓,读完意犹未尽,也的确如这本书的目的“stimulating”相符,值得一看。
评分简明扼要、主旨清晰,读时酣畅淋漓,读完意犹未尽,也的确如这本书的目的“stimulating”相符,值得一看。
评分简明扼要、主旨清晰,读时酣畅淋漓,读完意犹未尽,也的确如这本书的目的“stimulating”相符,值得一看。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有