In this title, two renowned political scientists make the contrarian, research-based case that - regardless of any other factors political scientists or historians may find relevant - the calculations and actions of rulers are the driving force of all politics, and the primary goal of rulers is to maintain power as long as possible. In this clever and accessible book, Bueno de Mesquita and Smith introduce us to their perspective of the political world. They bare the logic of politics, starting from the simple premise that leaders pursue their own ends, and that populations either have, or more often don't have, the power to constrain them to a significant degree. The book is organized by a series interconnected questions, among them: Why do leaders who wreck their countries keep their jobs for so long? Why do autocracies have dismal economic policies? How are there so many suffering people in resource-rich lands? Why do 'natural disasters' disproportionately strike poor nations? Why do 'evil-doers' so often collect loads of foreign aid? Why are democracies so good at war? In answering these questions, the authors look at politics, the choices of public policies, and even decisions about war and peace as lying outside of conventional thinking about culture and history. They set aside ideas of civic virtue and psychopathology. Such notions simply are not central to understanding what leaders do and why they do it. Instead, Bueno de Mesquita and Smith see politicians as self-interested louts, just the sort of people you wouldn't want to have over for dinner, but without whom you might not have dinner at all. And from this perspective, they are able to answer some perplexing mysteries of politics, shed light on what we read in the newspapers every single day, and offer realistic ways of improving human governance.
About the Author
Bruce Bueno de Mesquita is the Julius Silver Professor of Politics and director of the Alexander Hamilton Center for Political Economy at New York University. He is the author of 16 books, including The Predictioneer’s Game.Alastair Smith is professor of politics at New York University. The recipient of three grants from the National Science Foundation and author of three books, he was chosen as the 2005 Karl Deutsch Award winner, given biennially to the best international relations scholar under the age of 40.
本来对某些出版社愿意引进这样的书还是很高兴的,但如果把一本书经过断章取义的处理后再出版,很难讲还算不算做善事,因为有可能给原著抹黑。 翻了没几页,就看到“东北亚某个国家”这样的词了,本能的认为原著不可能这样写,于是找来英文原著做了简单的对照。没想到这一对照,...
評分你可以把这本书看成一个教程。 观察下来,有效。 有几个地方更需要注意: 1. 尽量观察那些存活了五十年以上的组织。 2. 这些组织,也符合本书的规则,但更高效,所以延续更久,矛盾解决更好。 3. 昙花一现式的组织,其实不需要太在意的。胡人无百年之国运,但满清也破了此例,...
評分看到有篇热门书评开始讨论作者的民主观点,实在可笑。作为大学老师,这门课的重点是政治权力的获取和运用,对照的是马基雅维利、霍布斯、麦迪逊、孟德斯鸠的看法。听课的学生生活在民主国家,随时运用民主制度,对民主的理解和实践绝对超过书评作者。那书评就是歪曲。如果说作...
評分陈虻说过,一个人应该逐渐建立起自己认知未知事物的坐标系。深感同意,如何理解和判断陌生领域的一些事情的是非价值其实就体现了一个人思想的深度、认知深度。而深度要远比广度来的重要(因为深度能够满足他人推动他人,而广度只是满足了自己) 而这本书就是一本帮助人建立如何...
評分這本書非常非常的好看 如果是無刪減版的更好看 原版有400頁 我在大陸買的這本只有396, 有關中國的都被刪了吧? 真討厭!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 我發的評論字數不夠多嗎? 豆瓣是怎麼了? 經常提示評論太短。
非常好讀瞭 沒畏懼感 //想到主編說的 書不求讀完 當你知道你為什麼要讀並且達成瞭這項訴求 就可以放下瞭 覺得對 為自己看不完每一本專著找到好颱階
评分用一種簡單模型(interchangeable, influential, essential)去替代另一種簡單模型(民主vs獨裁),然後生搬硬套。廢話太多,車軲轆話來迴說,最後我就隻看看每章最後的總結。舉瞭不少例子但分析太淺且牽強。最有趣的是,中國和新加坡的成功被作者稱為“例外”,然後乾脆就不討論瞭!
评分很討厭這種寫作風格,感覺不舒服,要不就完全嚴謹學術寫作,要不就寫齣暢銷書應有的水準,這種mixed的真心覺得做作討厭。\\#多日後為寫paper的吐槽# 真是的學術著作嗎??敢不敢再不嚴謹點?
评分嗬嗬
评分作者還是想說民主是個好東西. 此外, 對外援助通訊器材比食品藥物更有利於推進被援助國的民主
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美書屋 版权所有