In this title, two renowned political scientists make the contrarian, research-based case that - regardless of any other factors political scientists or historians may find relevant - the calculations and actions of rulers are the driving force of all politics, and the primary goal of rulers is to maintain power as long as possible. In this clever and accessible book, Bueno de Mesquita and Smith introduce us to their perspective of the political world. They bare the logic of politics, starting from the simple premise that leaders pursue their own ends, and that populations either have, or more often don't have, the power to constrain them to a significant degree. The book is organized by a series interconnected questions, among them: Why do leaders who wreck their countries keep their jobs for so long? Why do autocracies have dismal economic policies? How are there so many suffering people in resource-rich lands? Why do 'natural disasters' disproportionately strike poor nations? Why do 'evil-doers' so often collect loads of foreign aid? Why are democracies so good at war? In answering these questions, the authors look at politics, the choices of public policies, and even decisions about war and peace as lying outside of conventional thinking about culture and history. They set aside ideas of civic virtue and psychopathology. Such notions simply are not central to understanding what leaders do and why they do it. Instead, Bueno de Mesquita and Smith see politicians as self-interested louts, just the sort of people you wouldn't want to have over for dinner, but without whom you might not have dinner at all. And from this perspective, they are able to answer some perplexing mysteries of politics, shed light on what we read in the newspapers every single day, and offer realistic ways of improving human governance.
About the Author
Bruce Bueno de Mesquita is the Julius Silver Professor of Politics and director of the Alexander Hamilton Center for Political Economy at New York University. He is the author of 16 books, including The Predictioneer’s Game.Alastair Smith is professor of politics at New York University. The recipient of three grants from the National Science Foundation and author of three books, he was chosen as the 2005 Karl Deutsch Award winner, given biennially to the best international relations scholar under the age of 40.
从9年前郭美美事件到本次武汉疫情再次把红十字推上风口浪尖。到了全网愤怒的地步,我们会好奇为何红十字多年以来死性不改?就在备受质疑后红会仍然没有给出实质性的回复和惩罚。 其实作为普通人,我们要明白当谈论政治和权利时,我们谈论的不是意识形态,国籍或者祖籍或者文化...
评分放诸古今皆准的权力规则 http://www.dfdaily.com/html/1170/2013/3/10/958748.shtml 万维钢 发表于2013-03-10 01:21 十九世纪末的比利时国王利奥波德二世完全有理由成为一些人心中的偶像。 不管你是独裁者还是民主国家领导人,或者公司的CEO,只要能不折不扣地执...
评分這本書非常非常的好看 如果是無刪減版的更好看 原版有400頁 我在大陸買的這本只有396, 有關中國的都被刪了吧? 真討厭!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 我發的評論字數不夠多嗎? 豆瓣是怎麼了? 經常提示評論太短。
评分政治学学术论著,无权谋厚黑阴谋论。show you why, not how ... 核心观点: 没有真正的独裁,任何领袖都需要盟友。 盟友的范围包括:名义选民、影响者、致胜联盟,而且三者比例决定政体。 掌权的精髓: 1.缩小致胜联盟 ; 2.扩大名义选民; 3.知道钱在哪; 4.给致胜联盟足够的...
选择人理论(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Selectorate_theory)有点像用历史结果来决定建模准确性的游戏论的一个特例,优点是这个模型适合解释很多有趣的现象,尤其是近代非洲诸国独立后经历的各种独裁。如果你经常纳闷为何一个独裁者能稳固政权那么久,也许这本书可以提供一些答案,或者至少是思考的源头。
评分中亚一直在推荐书籍里显示中译版,评论说删节很多,终于提起兴趣找来原书看了一下,作者的一些观点非常硬脆斯汀,对民主和独裁剖析颇独到。想来天朝实在是地球一奇,经济与政治瘸着腿跑了那么远
评分脑洞太大,有点儿牵强。不过有些部分(比如援助问题)听起来挺有道理的。 分好高啊。
评分书评已发:《放诸古今皆准的权力规则》
评分《傲娇小独裁养成手册》 (于是我上了这课的最大感受就是卡扎菲年轻时很萌……么)
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有