In this title, two renowned political scientists make the contrarian, research-based case that - regardless of any other factors political scientists or historians may find relevant - the calculations and actions of rulers are the driving force of all politics, and the primary goal of rulers is to maintain power as long as possible. In this clever and accessible book, Bueno de Mesquita and Smith introduce us to their perspective of the political world. They bare the logic of politics, starting from the simple premise that leaders pursue their own ends, and that populations either have, or more often don't have, the power to constrain them to a significant degree. The book is organized by a series interconnected questions, among them: Why do leaders who wreck their countries keep their jobs for so long? Why do autocracies have dismal economic policies? How are there so many suffering people in resource-rich lands? Why do 'natural disasters' disproportionately strike poor nations? Why do 'evil-doers' so often collect loads of foreign aid? Why are democracies so good at war? In answering these questions, the authors look at politics, the choices of public policies, and even decisions about war and peace as lying outside of conventional thinking about culture and history. They set aside ideas of civic virtue and psychopathology. Such notions simply are not central to understanding what leaders do and why they do it. Instead, Bueno de Mesquita and Smith see politicians as self-interested louts, just the sort of people you wouldn't want to have over for dinner, but without whom you might not have dinner at all. And from this perspective, they are able to answer some perplexing mysteries of politics, shed light on what we read in the newspapers every single day, and offer realistic ways of improving human governance.
About the Author
Bruce Bueno de Mesquita is the Julius Silver Professor of Politics and director of the Alexander Hamilton Center for Political Economy at New York University. He is the author of 16 books, including The Predictioneer’s Game.Alastair Smith is professor of politics at New York University. The recipient of three grants from the National Science Foundation and author of three books, he was chosen as the 2005 Karl Deutsch Award winner, given biennially to the best international relations scholar under the age of 40.
很有趣的一本书 看完有一段时间了 也没做全书总结但仍印象深刻 据说中文版删改很多 回头看英文版吧 书里阐述了很多关于民主和独裁体制的关键特点等等 码了一大堆字,豆瓣告诉我涉及敏感内容不能发表。。。 总之...
评分放诸古今皆准的权力规则 http://www.dfdaily.com/html/1170/2013/3/10/958748.shtml 万维钢 发表于2013-03-10 01:21 十九世纪末的比利时国王利奥波德二世完全有理由成为一些人心中的偶像。 不管你是独裁者还是民主国家领导人,或者公司的CEO,只要能不折不扣地执...
评分看到有篇热门书评开始讨论作者的民主观点,实在可笑。作为大学老师,这门课的重点是政治权力的获取和运用,对照的是马基雅维利、霍布斯、麦迪逊、孟德斯鸠的看法。听课的学生生活在民主国家,随时运用民主制度,对民主的理解和实践绝对超过书评作者。那书评就是歪曲。如果说作...
评分看到有篇热门书评开始讨论作者的民主观点,实在可笑。作为大学老师,这门课的重点是政治权力的获取和运用,对照的是马基雅维利、霍布斯、麦迪逊、孟德斯鸠的看法。听课的学生生活在民主国家,随时运用民主制度,对民主的理解和实践绝对超过书评作者。那书评就是歪曲。如果说作...
评分最近在看《独裁者手册》这本书,已经过半。通过这本书,读者会发现,其实所有独裁者与民主国家,都具备相同的潜在选民,只是规模和“收买”的形式和范围的区别。这本书也是一本“管理学”意义的书。 潜在选民分为三个即:可替代者,有影响者和不可替代者(致胜联盟)。 小规模...
今年读的最后一本书,和 why nation fails相得益彰。一个是讲政治,一个讲经济,其实说的都是同一件事。以前拿起the logic of political survival,结果没看下去,模型有点太复杂,这本确实非常容易读。
评分东方早报推荐的,文笔简洁,观点有趣。可惜我近期心情有限,没有读完就还给图书馆了。
评分今年读的最后一本书,和 why nation fails相得益彰。一个是讲政治,一个讲经济,其实说的都是同一件事。以前拿起the logic of political survival,结果没看下去,模型有点太复杂,这本确实非常容易读。
评分书评已发:《放诸古今皆准的权力规则》
评分东方早报推荐的,文笔简洁,观点有趣。可惜我近期心情有限,没有读完就还给图书馆了。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有