In this title, two renowned political scientists make the contrarian, research-based case that - regardless of any other factors political scientists or historians may find relevant - the calculations and actions of rulers are the driving force of all politics, and the primary goal of rulers is to maintain power as long as possible. In this clever and accessible book, Bueno de Mesquita and Smith introduce us to their perspective of the political world. They bare the logic of politics, starting from the simple premise that leaders pursue their own ends, and that populations either have, or more often don't have, the power to constrain them to a significant degree. The book is organized by a series interconnected questions, among them: Why do leaders who wreck their countries keep their jobs for so long? Why do autocracies have dismal economic policies? How are there so many suffering people in resource-rich lands? Why do 'natural disasters' disproportionately strike poor nations? Why do 'evil-doers' so often collect loads of foreign aid? Why are democracies so good at war? In answering these questions, the authors look at politics, the choices of public policies, and even decisions about war and peace as lying outside of conventional thinking about culture and history. They set aside ideas of civic virtue and psychopathology. Such notions simply are not central to understanding what leaders do and why they do it. Instead, Bueno de Mesquita and Smith see politicians as self-interested louts, just the sort of people you wouldn't want to have over for dinner, but without whom you might not have dinner at all. And from this perspective, they are able to answer some perplexing mysteries of politics, shed light on what we read in the newspapers every single day, and offer realistic ways of improving human governance.
About the Author
Bruce Bueno de Mesquita is the Julius Silver Professor of Politics and director of the Alexander Hamilton Center for Political Economy at New York University. He is the author of 16 books, including The Predictioneer’s Game.Alastair Smith is professor of politics at New York University. The recipient of three grants from the National Science Foundation and author of three books, he was chosen as the 2005 Karl Deutsch Award winner, given biennially to the best international relations scholar under the age of 40.
欢迎关注我的微信公众号:Master熊。每周看本书,看完做图解。 小熊之前啃了一本书——《独裁者手册》,看完后感觉打开了视角的新大门。所以在这也把这本书图解下,分享给大家。 先说下本书中的核心——选举人理论。小熊尽量简洁得表述,也请大家仔细看看。 一、领导人被谁...
评分 评分看到有篇热门书评开始讨论作者的民主观点,实在可笑。作为大学老师,这门课的重点是政治权力的获取和运用,对照的是马基雅维利、霍布斯、麦迪逊、孟德斯鸠的看法。听课的学生生活在民主国家,随时运用民主制度,对民主的理解和实践绝对超过书评作者。那书评就是歪曲。如果说作...
评分政治学学术论著,无权谋厚黑阴谋论。show you why, not how ... 核心观点: 没有真正的独裁,任何领袖都需要盟友。 盟友的范围包括:名义选民、影响者、致胜联盟,而且三者比例决定政体。 掌权的精髓: 1.缩小致胜联盟 ; 2.扩大名义选民; 3.知道钱在哪; 4.给致胜联盟足够的...
评分陈虻说过,一个人应该逐渐建立起自己认知未知事物的坐标系。深感同意,如何理解和判断陌生领域的一些事情的是非价值其实就体现了一个人思想的深度、认知深度。而深度要远比广度来的重要(因为深度能够满足他人推动他人,而广度只是满足了自己) 而这本书就是一本帮助人建立如何...
非常好的政治学科普书。主要强调三点,一是实证性(相对于规范性),二是方法论个人主义,三是政治联盟的组成和维持。读这本入门既避免了“天下乌鸦一般黑”的虚无主义病,也不会陷入过于moralistic地看政治。这本中文引进版恐怕少不了删减。
评分中亚一直在推荐书籍里显示中译版,评论说删节很多,终于提起兴趣找来原书看了一下,作者的一些观点非常硬脆斯汀,对民主和独裁剖析颇独到。想来天朝实在是地球一奇,经济与政治瘸着腿跑了那么远
评分非常好的政治学科普书。主要强调三点,一是实证性(相对于规范性),二是方法论个人主义,三是政治联盟的组成和维持。读这本入门既避免了“天下乌鸦一般黑”的虚无主义病,也不会陷入过于moralistic地看政治。这本中文引进版恐怕少不了删减。
评分:无
评分怎么想都觉得军队那里太难做因果识别了,不过,那又如何?也许大家都是猜到了结果猜不透开始
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有