Two Concepts of Liberty was the inaugural lecture delivered by Isaiah Berlin before the University of Oxford on October 31, 1958. It was subsequently published as a 57-page pamphlet by Oxford at the Clarendon Press. It also appears in the collection of Berlin's papers entitled Four Essays on Liberty (1969) and was more recently reissued in a collection entitled simply Liberty (2002).
Berlin distinguished between two forms or concepts of liberty – negative liberty and positive liberty – and argued that the latter concept has often been used to cover up abuse, leading to the curtailment of people's negative liberties "for their own good".
Berlin believed that positive liberty nearly always gave rise to the abuse of power. For when a political leadership believes that they hold the philosophical key to a better future, this sublime end can be used to justify drastic and brutal means. Berlin saw the vanguard elite of the Soviet Union as a prime example of the dangers of 'positive liberty' and the concept can be seen as especially salient during the Cold War, where revolutionary sentiment was rife.
Berlin believed that a more precautious principle was needed, and that was 'negative liberty', where individuals are protected against radical or revolutionary messages, and thus have little grand or existential freedom but are granted the more 'internal' liberty to pursue recreational and consumer interests.
Sir Isaiah Berlin, OM (6 June 1909 – 5 November 1997) was a philosopher and historian of ideas, regarded as one of the leading liberal thinkers of the twentieth century. He excelled as an essayist, lecturer and conversationalist; and as a brilliant speaker who delivered, rapidly and spontaneously, richly allusive and coherently structured material, whether for a lecture series at Oxford University or as a broadcaster on the BBC Third Programme, usually without a script. Many of his essays and lectures were later collected in book form.
Born in Riga, now capital of Latvia, then part of the Russian Empire, he was the first person of Jewish descent to be elected to a prize fellowship at All Souls College, Oxford. From 1957 to 1967, he was Chichele Professor of Social and Political Theory at the University of Oxford. He was president of the Aristotelian Society from 1963 to 1964. In 1966, he helped to found Wolfson College, Oxford, and became its first President. He was knighted in 1957, and was awarded the Order of Merit in 1971. He was President of the British Academy from 1974 to 1978. He also received the 1979 Jerusalem Prize for his writings on individual freedom.
Berlin's work on liberal theory has had a lasting influence. His 1958 inaugural lecture, "Two Concepts of Liberty", famous for its distinction between positive and negative liberty, has informed much of the debate since then on the relationship between liberty and other values.
(1)何谓自由 以赛亚·伯林(Isaiah Berlin)提出了不受外部干涉和自我支配自身“两种自由”的观点。围绕这种自由观的对立,又关联到是将人视为合理的主体,亦或是道德的主体。而这又会限定我们对应该采取的政治制度的想象。 1958年柏林在演讲中提出消极自由与积...
评分(1)何谓自由 以赛亚·伯林(Isaiah Berlin)提出了不受外部干涉和自我支配自身“两种自由”的观点。围绕这种自由观的对立,又关联到是将人视为合理的主体,亦或是道德的主体。而这又会限定我们对应该采取的政治制度的想象。 1958年柏林在演讲中提出消极自由与积...
评分(1)何谓自由 以赛亚·伯林(Isaiah Berlin)提出了不受外部干涉和自我支配自身“两种自由”的观点。围绕这种自由观的对立,又关联到是将人视为合理的主体,亦或是道德的主体。而这又会限定我们对应该采取的政治制度的想象。 1958年柏林在演讲中提出消极自由与积...
评分(1)何谓自由 以赛亚·伯林(Isaiah Berlin)提出了不受外部干涉和自我支配自身“两种自由”的观点。围绕这种自由观的对立,又关联到是将人视为合理的主体,亦或是道德的主体。而这又会限定我们对应该采取的政治制度的想象。 1958年柏林在演讲中提出消极自由与积...
评分(1)何谓自由 以赛亚·伯林(Isaiah Berlin)提出了不受外部干涉和自我支配自身“两种自由”的观点。围绕这种自由观的对立,又关联到是将人视为合理的主体,亦或是道德的主体。而这又会限定我们对应该采取的政治制度的想象。 1958年柏林在演讲中提出消极自由与积...
这本书带来的阅读体验是极其颠覆性的。它不是在教你“应该”如何思考,而是在强迫你“重新”思考那些你以为早已想明白的问题。作者似乎拥有一种魔力,能够将那些看似遥远、高悬于空的政治哲学概念,拉回到我们日常生活的具体情境中。例如,他对公共领域与私人领域划分的讨论,立刻让我联想到当代社会中无处不在的数字监控与隐私的消融,这种即时的共鸣感,是很多理论著作所不具备的。我尤其欣赏作者的叙事视角——他似乎总能站在一个更高的维度,审视人类为争取和定义自由所付出的巨大代价。文字的节奏变化多端,时而如疾风骤雨般阐发激进观点,时而又如涓涓细流般温柔地梳理历史脉络。这种节奏感使得长篇的阅读过程充满了期待,生怕错过任何一个精妙的转折或一句关键的总结。
评分坦白说,这本书的密度极高,初读时需要极大的耐心与专注力,它绝非那种可以轻松翻阅的消遣读物。作者对历史文献和经典文本的掌握程度,达到了令人惊叹的程度,仿佛他与那些千年前的思想家进行着跨越时空的对话。书中对“不受干涉”原则的深挖,探讨了它在不同历史阶段如何被误用或被推向极端,这种对概念“异化”过程的剖析,是全书的一大亮点。我被书中对权威与个人权利之间微妙关系的探讨深深吸引,作者巧妙地避开了二元对立的陷阱,展示了权力结构如何从外部干预个体的自我实现过程。更值得称道的是,作者在论证过程中展现出一种近乎严苛的学理性,每一个引文的放置,每一个理论模型的构建,都经过了千锤百炼,体现出极高的学术操守。这让我感觉,手中捧着的不仅仅是一本书,而是一份经过时间检验的、对人类自由形态的严肃宣言。
评分翻开这本书的瞬间,我仿佛置身于一个巨大的思想迷宫,但幸好,作者像一位经验老到的向导,手中紧握着一条清晰的线索。这位学者的文字功力达到了近乎艺术的层面,他没有采用那种故作高深的晦涩语言,而是用一种清晰、流畅、却又蕴含深意的叙事节奏引导着我们。阅读过程中,最让我震撼的是其对“积极自由”和“消极自由”的辨析,那份精密的逻辑推演,简直像在进行一场高水平的数学证明。每一个论断都建立在前一个论断的稳固基石之上,层层递进,无可辩驳。我尤其欣赏他处理复杂政治哲学议题时的那种克制,没有轻易站队,而是将不同观点的张力完整地呈现出来,让读者自己去感受和裁决。这种对待思想的尊重,使得这本书不仅是一部学术著作,更像是一场邀请所有思辨者参与的、关于如何公正治理的圆桌会议。读完之后,我感觉自己对政治语言中的那些模糊地带,有了一种前所未有的清晰感和批判性视角。
评分这本鸿篇巨制,甫一展开,便如同一张铺陈至无穷尽的、关于人类社会结构与个体能动性的宏大地图。作者的笔触细腻而富有穿透力,仿佛能直抵哲思的内核,将那些抽象的概念一一具象化,呈现在读者眼前。我读到的是一种对既有权力结构的深刻反思,那种对自由边界的不断试探与重塑,着实引人入胜。书中的论述并非一味的理论堆砌,而是充满了对历史案例的精妙引用和对现实困境的敏锐洞察。尤其是在探讨何种“善”才能作为衡量自由的最高准则时,作者展现出的那种审慎与平衡感,令人不得不停下来深思良久。那种在多元价值冲突中寻求张力的写作手法,使得整部作品充满了动态的美感,而非僵硬的教条。它迫使我重新审视自己对于“被限制”与“被解放”的定义,那些习以为常的社会规范,在作者的解构下,无不暴露出其背后的权力运作痕迹。可以说,这本书为思考现代性带来的诸多悖论,提供了一套极为坚实而富有弹性的分析工具。
评分读完此书,最大的感受是知识上的充实与思想上的“不适”。这种“不适”并非源于作者的观点难以接受,而是因为他精确地指出了我们思想中的盲区和舒适区。作者对于“何谓良善生活”这一终极问题的探讨,没有给出标准答案,而是提供了一系列精密的反思工具箱。书中对不同哲学流派观点的交织与冲突的处理,展示了作者非凡的驾驭能力,他如同一个高明的棋手,布局严密,每一步棋都牵动着后续的无数可能。我被那种对理论深度的不懈追求所折服,这是一种真正意义上的学术探险。它挑战了我们对于“自由”这个词汇的肤浅理解,揭示了其背后潜藏的复杂张力和历史包袱。整本书散发着一种冷静而有力的理性光辉,它不煽动情绪,却能引发最深刻的内心震动。
评分土豪室友远去坡国上班前把全套政经reading扔给了我...刷里丁从电子版晋升打印版阅读热情蹭蹭上涨=v=
评分"To realize the relative validity of one's convictions and yet stand for them unflinchingly"
评分语言很动人,尤其是开头。
评分Negative and positive liberty.
评分土豪室友远去坡国上班前把全套政经reading扔给了我...刷里丁从电子版晋升打印版阅读热情蹭蹭上涨=v=
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有