Benedict Anderson was Aaron L. Binenkorp Professor of International Studies Emeritus at Cornell University. He was editor of the journal Indonesia and author of Java in a Time of Revolution, The Spectre of Comparisons: Nationalism, Southeast Asia, and the World and Imagined Communities.
The definitive, bestselling book on the origins and development of nationalism.
Imagined Communities, Benedict Anderson's brilliant book on nationalism, forged a new field of study when it first appeared in 1983. Since then it has sold over a quarter of a million copies and is widely considered the most important book on the subject. In this greatly anticipated revised edition, Anderson updates and elaborates on the core question: what makes people live, die and kill in the name of nations? He shows how an originary nationalism born in the Americas was adopted by popular movements in Europe, by imperialist powers, and by the anti-imperialist resistances in Asia and Africa, and explores the way communities were created by the growth of the nation-state, the interaction between capitalism and printing, and the birth of vernacular languages-of-state. Anderson revisits these fundamental ideas, showing how their relevance has been tested by the events of the past two decades.
原作者:彭晓芸 原题:《当插科打诨遭遇民族主义》 发表在http://opinion.dwnews.com/news/2011-09-27/58164940-2.html (节选) 这里不能不提起由台湾学者吴叡人翻译的班纳迪克·安德森(Benedict Anderson)经典著作——《想象的共同体》,这本被翻译成三十几种语言的著作...
评分 评分1。内容。正如副标题所言:"民族主义的起源与散布"作者试图阐释民族之来源。这本书一出之后影响很大,并引起大量跟贴,有顶的有灭的,估计想摆沙发的也不少,作者顺便建立大批粉丝群体。。。可惜早出了几年,倘若换作互联网时代,可以实时观战,那阵势该是怎样的酣畅淋漓。 ...
评分Excellent masterpiece on how the imagined communities help to shape the nationalism and national building in reality. It is a surprise that the Chinese version delete the Ninth Chapter with Water Benjamin's classic statement about "modernity". Reread, rethink, and reinterpret.
评分將拉丁世界的枯滯視為神聖共同體的崩塌,將民族主義與世俗化共時並置,隨後便將宗教改革後的現代世界、世俗化的和世俗的現代世界混為一談。恰因如此,作者指出現代進化/進步思想對終極問題的迴避。對我的研究而言,這本書最大的貢獻是將錯就錯,(誤)認為民族主義提供了一種代償性的答案。
评分fantastic book
评分越讀到後面越覺得有夾硬來的成份,但自己選的題真是夾硬來也要寫完啊(好討厭一到期末就暴飲暴食的自己,希望隨著學生生涯的正式結束這種狀態也可以徹底告別)
评分结尾时作者终于用了Identity印证了我的理解,民族在受外界压力下会重新反思自己的身份,政府也倾向于用救国兴邦(历史积怨)来谋求发展(官方民族主义)。比较疑惑的是安德森为何执着于语言(母语化)作为民族间最核心的分野,伴以在全书中反复出现的print-capitalism,声称语言是无法被统一的。而民族主义和马克思主义的关联虽几次由贵族、中产阶级的话题提起,但未能深入解释其不同的史观。对于那些多民族、多语言的国家(马来西亚的例子不够强),除殖民与全球化外,到底有没有文化因素影响民族主义。所谓的社科界的国家利益到底是说什么。设想在中国语境之下,华夏文明、儒家文化、汉族、中华民族这几个历史概念都可以做下回溯和区分,传统(不是历史)和政治关系到底怎么平衡、不相互利用?最有趣的仍是补增谈博物馆一章M
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有