Michael Pollan
Michael Pollan is the author of four five books: Second Nature, A Place of My Own, The Botany of Desire, which received the Borders Original Voices Award for the best nonfiction work of 2001 and was recognized as a best book of the year by the American Booksellers Association and Amazon, and the national bestellers, The Omnivore's Dilemma, and In Defense of Food.
A longtime contributing writer to The New York Times Magazine, Pollan is also the Knight Professor of Journalism at UC Berkeley. His writing on food and agriculture has won numerous awards, including the Reuters/World Conservation Union Global Award in Environmental Journalism, the James Beard Award, and the Genesis Award from the American Humane Association.
What to eat, what not to eat, and how to think about health: a manifesto for our times
"Eat food. Not too much. Mostly plants." These simple words go to the heart of Michael Pollan's In Defense of Food, the well-considered answers he provides to the questions posed in the bestselling The Omnivore's Dilemma.
Humans used to know how to eat well, Pollan argues. But the balanced dietary lessons that were once passed down through generations have been confused, complicated, and distorted by food industry marketers, nutritional scientists, and journalists-all of whom have much to gain from our dietary confusion. As a result, we face today a complex culinary landscape dense with bad advice and foods that are not "real." These "edible foodlike substances" are often packaged with labels bearing health claims that are typically false or misleading. Indeed, real food is fast disappearing from the marketplace, to be replaced by "nutrients," and plain old eating by an obsession with nutrition that is, paradoxically, ruining our health, not to mention our meals. Michael Pollan's sensible and decidedly counterintuitive advice is: "Don't eat anything that your great-great grandmother would not recognize as food."
Writing In Defense of Food, and affirming the joy of eating, Pollan suggests that if we would pay more for better, well-grown food, but buy less of it, we'll benefit ourselves, our communities, and the environment at large. Taking a clear-eyed look at what science does and does not know about the links between diet and health, he proposes a new way to think about the question of what to eat that is informed by ecology and tradition rather than by the prevailing nutrient-by-nutrient approach.
In Defense of Food reminds us that, despite the daunting dietary landscape Americans confront in the modern supermarket, the solutions to the current omnivore's dilemma can be found all around us.
In looking toward traditional diets the world over, as well as the foods our families-and regions-historically enjoyed, we can recover a more balanced, reasonable, and pleasurable approach to food. Michael Pollan's bracing and eloquent manifesto shows us how we might start making thoughtful food choices that will enrich our lives and enlarge our sense of what it means to be healthy.
在这个日益注重个人健康的时代,吃什么以及怎么吃成了每个人都会关心的事情。然而让人意想不到的是,在有了如此之多的营养科学指导之后,人们反而因为饮食问题罹患了更多的疾病。是食物的问题,还是社会的问题,抑或是营养科学的问题?针对这些疑问,作者写下了本书《为食物辩...
評分无机客 选择吃什么、不吃什么,愈来愈成为了时下众多追求健康的男女老少们每日考虑的问题,各种各样的健康食谱大行其道,生活中更是不乏将营养补剂当作灵丹妙药的“健康”人士。 《为食物辩护》的作者迈克尔·坡伦观察到人类产生了一种“对于健康饮食的不健康的痴迷”。在...
評分本周读物:《为食物辩护》,讲营养学的神话以及应该如何“健康地吃”。其实全本书有点拖沓,想说的内容、大原则可以压缩到1/3容量。另外就是感觉该书是写给吃得过多过快过精细的美国胖子看的,某些内容还没到需要国人担忧的程度。个人评分3.5/5 作者主要建议撷选: 1. 要吃食物...
評分 評分書的前半部分基本上講一些理論上的有關食物安全的問題或者工業化食物。後半部分講方法,怎樣吃健康,但是我讀完並沒有茅塞頓開的感覺。
评分可以說是Whole30的古早廣告。 Quick takeaway:如果食物包裝上有五個以上你不認識不會念的成分就彆買瞭
评分感覺作者過於執著於迴歸自然,而現狀是迴歸自然的成本是大多數人無法承擔的
评分"Eat FOOD; Not too much; Mostly plants."
评分其實很簡單的道理:自己做菜,多吃菜少吃肉,彆吃太飽,不知道為什麼實踐起來越來越難,決定今年開始從“不吃零食”做起。
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美書屋 版权所有