圖書標籤: 政治學 社會學 曆史社會學 政治社會學 HistoricalSociology 比較政治 政治 Revolution
发表于2024-11-22
States and Social Revolutions pdf epub mobi txt 電子書 下載 2024
This is a 1979 book by political scientist and sociologist Theda Skocpol, published by Cambridge University Press and explaining the causes of revolutions through the structural functionalism sociological paradigm comparative historical analysis of the French Revolution of 1787 through the early 19th century French Revolution, the Russian Revolution of 1917 through the 1930s Russian Revolution and the Chinese Revolution of 1911 through the 1960s Cultural Revolution. Skocpol argues that these three cases, despite being spread over a century and a half, are similar in the sense that all three were Social Revolutions
Skocpol asserts that Social Revolutions are rapid and basic transformations of a society's state and class structures. This is different from, for example, a mere 'rebellion' which merely involves a revolt of subordinate classes but may not create structural change and from a Political Revolution that may change state structures but not social structures. Industrialization can transform social structure but not change the political structure. What is unique about Social Revolutions, she says, is that basic changes in social structure and political structure occur in a mutually reinforcing fashion and these changes occur through intense sociopolitical conflict.
THEDA SKOCPOL (PhD, Harvard, 1975) is the Victor S. Thomas Professor of Government and Sociology at Harvard University. At Harvard, she has served as Dean of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences (2005-2007) and as Director of the Center for American Political Studies (2000-2006). In 1996, Skocpol served as President of the Social Science History Association, an interdisciplinary professional group, and in 2002-03, she served as President of the American Political Science Association during the centennial of this leading professional body. In 2007, she was awarded the Johan Skytte Prize in Political Science for her "visionary analysis of the significance of the state for revolutions, welfare, and political trust, pursued with theoretical depth and empirical evidence." The Skytte Prize is one of the largest and most prestigious in political science and is awarded annually by the Skytte Foundation at Uppsala University (Sweden) to the scholar who in the view of the foundation has made the most valuable contribution to the discipline. Skocpol has also been elected to membership in all three major U.S. interdisciplinary honor societies: the American Academy of Arts and Sciences (elected 1994), the American Philosophical Society (elected 2006), and the National Academy of Sciences (elected 2008).
Skocpol's work covers an unusually broad spectrum of topics including both comparative politics (States and Social Revolutions, 1979) and American politics (Protecting Soldiers and Mothers: The Political Origins of Social Policy in the United States, 1992). Among her other works are Bringing the State Back In (1985, with Peter Evans and Dietrich Rueschemeyer); Social Policy in the United States (1995); Boomerang: Clinton's Health Security Effort and the Turn Against Government in US Politics (1996); Civic Engagement in American Democracy (1999, with Morris Fiorina); Diminished Democracy: From Membership to Management in American Civic Life (2003); Inequality and American Democracy: What We Know and What We Need to Learn (2005, with Lawrence R. Jacobs); What a Mighty Power We Can Be: African American Fraternal Groups and The Struggle for Racial Equality (2006, with Ariane Liazos and Marshall Ganz); and The Transformation of American Politics: Activist Government and the Rise of Conservatism (2007, with Paul Pierson). Her books and articles have been widely cited in political science literature and have won numerous awards, including the 1993 Woodrow Wilson Award of the American Political Science Association for the best book in political science for the previous year. Skocpol's research focuses on U.S. social policy and civic engagement in American democracy, including changes since the 1960s. She has recently launched new projects on the development of U.S. higher education and on the transformations of U.S. federal policies in the Obama era.
還是值得一讀的著作。放在學術史的角度去看會更有意思。
評分主要是讀方法論的部分,內容粗略掃過。友鄰功夫熊貓多年前的書評很充分。對於comparative history和mechanism等有不少可供深入/吐槽的地方。還是相當不喜歡這個路數【尤其畫虎不成反類犬的不少人】,但是不喜歡歸不喜歡,學術史和史學理論的話怎麼都繞不開。
評分花很多精力讀完; very ambitious; justify comparison by defining social revolutions, by taking a non-voluntarist, structural perspective, and most importantly, seeing the state as an autonomous structure; because of these, three revolutions, their causes and outcomes can be compared. political crises+peasant revolts-->more centralized, bureaucratic state.
評分這學期的三個大主題就social revolution我學的最好啦~~~
評分還是值得一讀的著作。放在學術史的角度去看會更有意思。
人们为什么起来革命?当我们检视世界漫长的历史,尤其是当我们面对着生活在中国大地上坚忍沉默的农民和他们的生活时,这个问题看起来更加不那么简单和引人入胜。这是斯考契波的著作《国家与社会革命》何以引人关注的原因之一,而本书的副标题“对法国、俄国和中国的比较...
評分2016年5月10日 《国家与社会革命》 ……我不能要求一个政治作家是一个作家……然而真的太蛋疼了……什么鬼描述,绝对是普通人看完也全无印象的类型……发现看了三本都是这个蛋疼法。 只能挑感兴趣的章节细读。不然看不进去。 那么少人对政治感兴趣,难道也有这个原因?我想到那...
評分作者在此书中,尝试构建一套完整的解释机制以说明结构性因素如何产生革命以及引导革命的最终走向。在开篇时,作者便集中说明了本书所采用的三个分析原则和一个方法论视角。作者强调在进行革命分析时应当采取“非意志论”的结构性视角,不能将革命仅仅视作群众革命意图作出的选...
評分想写书评但书放在办公室里了,全凭记忆来了,如果有记错的地方欢迎指出。 上发展研究的老师曾经给学生放过一段Skocpol的采访录像,其中谈到她那本State and Social Revolution出版之后引起的巨大争议。“正统”的社会学家认为她研究的case太少变量太多,因而不科学(失去了太...
評分研究生院的方法课是一种蛮奇怪的存在。就像其他的graduate seminar一样,课上基本上不告诉你任何定论,而是把你当作成熟的研究者,直接把你带入到学术圈重要的辩论中去。但对于一个急切的想知道做研究是什么样子的、怎么上手做研究的一年级学生来说,直接读那种在方法论上吵来...
States and Social Revolutions pdf epub mobi txt 電子書 下載 2024