This is a 1979 book by political scientist and sociologist Theda Skocpol, published by Cambridge University Press and explaining the causes of revolutions through the structural functionalism sociological paradigm comparative historical analysis of the French Revolution of 1787 through the early 19th century French Revolution, the Russian Revolution of 1917 through the 1930s Russian Revolution and the Chinese Revolution of 1911 through the 1960s Cultural Revolution. Skocpol argues that these three cases, despite being spread over a century and a half, are similar in the sense that all three were Social Revolutions
Skocpol asserts that Social Revolutions are rapid and basic transformations of a society's state and class structures. This is different from, for example, a mere 'rebellion' which merely involves a revolt of subordinate classes but may not create structural change and from a Political Revolution that may change state structures but not social structures. Industrialization can transform social structure but not change the political structure. What is unique about Social Revolutions, she says, is that basic changes in social structure and political structure occur in a mutually reinforcing fashion and these changes occur through intense sociopolitical conflict.
THEDA SKOCPOL (PhD, Harvard, 1975) is the Victor S. Thomas Professor of Government and Sociology at Harvard University. At Harvard, she has served as Dean of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences (2005-2007) and as Director of the Center for American Political Studies (2000-2006). In 1996, Skocpol served as President of the Social Science History Association, an interdisciplinary professional group, and in 2002-03, she served as President of the American Political Science Association during the centennial of this leading professional body. In 2007, she was awarded the Johan Skytte Prize in Political Science for her "visionary analysis of the significance of the state for revolutions, welfare, and political trust, pursued with theoretical depth and empirical evidence." The Skytte Prize is one of the largest and most prestigious in political science and is awarded annually by the Skytte Foundation at Uppsala University (Sweden) to the scholar who in the view of the foundation has made the most valuable contribution to the discipline. Skocpol has also been elected to membership in all three major U.S. interdisciplinary honor societies: the American Academy of Arts and Sciences (elected 1994), the American Philosophical Society (elected 2006), and the National Academy of Sciences (elected 2008).
Skocpol's work covers an unusually broad spectrum of topics including both comparative politics (States and Social Revolutions, 1979) and American politics (Protecting Soldiers and Mothers: The Political Origins of Social Policy in the United States, 1992). Among her other works are Bringing the State Back In (1985, with Peter Evans and Dietrich Rueschemeyer); Social Policy in the United States (1995); Boomerang: Clinton's Health Security Effort and the Turn Against Government in US Politics (1996); Civic Engagement in American Democracy (1999, with Morris Fiorina); Diminished Democracy: From Membership to Management in American Civic Life (2003); Inequality and American Democracy: What We Know and What We Need to Learn (2005, with Lawrence R. Jacobs); What a Mighty Power We Can Be: African American Fraternal Groups and The Struggle for Racial Equality (2006, with Ariane Liazos and Marshall Ganz); and The Transformation of American Politics: Activist Government and the Rise of Conservatism (2007, with Paul Pierson). Her books and articles have been widely cited in political science literature and have won numerous awards, including the 1993 Woodrow Wilson Award of the American Political Science Association for the best book in political science for the previous year. Skocpol's research focuses on U.S. social policy and civic engagement in American democracy, including changes since the 1960s. She has recently launched new projects on the development of U.S. higher education and on the transformations of U.S. federal policies in the Obama era.
译者序写得很好,是很好的全书概括,提纲挈领。 本书是第三代革命研究中的代表。第一代革命研究在20世纪初到40年底啊,追寻革命的历史事实,所谓“自然史学派”,描述并总结;第二代试图找寻革命的普适性理论,是二战后到70年代;第三代便是本书,强调结构性视角,从70年代中期...
评分 评分悠着点。。。请求不要把命都革了。。。。 悠着点。。。请求不要把命都革了。。。。悠着点。。。请求不要把命都革了。。。。悠着点。。。请求不要把命都革了。。。。悠着点。。。请求不要把命都革了。。。。悠着点。。。请求不要把命都革了。。。。悠着点。。。请求不要把命都革...
评分### 超越国界的普适性洞察:对人类共同命运的反思 这本书最深刻的价值,或许在于它通过对特定地域和特定时代的考察,提炼出了具有高度普适性的社会动力学原理。它探讨的关于权力真空、意识形态真空如何被填补,以及社会群体如何重新定义其身份和忠诚的机制,是放之四海而皆准的。我越读下去,越感觉到作者的关怀并不仅仅局限于书中的那些具体国家,而是指向了人类社会在面对巨大挑战时所展现出的适应、反抗与重塑的能力。它提供了一套工具箱,使我们能更好地分析当前世界各地正在发生的、或即将发生的社会动荡与制度更迭。它带来的不是简单的知识积累,而是一种思维方式的升级,一种对人类社会演化规律更具谦卑和敬畏的认识。这本书的讨论,无疑为我们理解当下的全球性挑战,提供了至关重要的历史参照系和理论支撑。
评分### 读后感悟:探索社会变革的宏大叙事 这本书以一种令人振奋的宏观视角,深入剖析了现代社会转型的复杂肌理,特别是那些标志性的、彻底重塑国家命运的剧烈变革时期。作者的笔触极为细腻,将政治、经济、文化思潮的交织描绘得淋漓尽致,仿佛带领读者亲临历史的十字路口,亲历决策者的挣扎与民众的觉醒。我尤其欣赏其对于“结构性压力”与“能动性”之间辩证关系的探讨。它没有简单地将历史归结于某个单一因素的决定性作用,而是展现了一幅多层次的因果网络,其中制度的僵化如何催生了民意的沸腾,而关键人物的行动又如何在关键时刻点燃了导火索。那种将宏大历史进程与微观个体经验巧妙融合的叙事手法,极大地增强了文本的代入感和说服力。读完后,我对理解近代国家构建的内在逻辑,乃至当代世界格局的形成,都有了一种更为立体和深刻的认识,不再满足于教科书式的简单定论,而是开始探究那些隐藏在历史表象之下的深层驱动力。
评分### 叙事节奏的张弛有度:从涓涓细流到江河奔涌 这本书在叙事节奏的控制上达到了出神入化的境界,这一点非常值得称赞。开篇时,它可能略显沉稳,如同观察者在历史的雾霭中寻找清晰的参照点,铺陈着复杂的社会背景和长期积累的矛盾。然而,一旦进入到关键的转折点,叙事张力便急剧攀升,文字变得愈发紧凑有力,那种无可阻挡的历史洪流感扑面而来。作者对高潮部分的描绘尤其具有画面感和戏剧张力,让人屏住呼吸,仿佛亲历了那些决定历史走向的瞬间。这种节奏的张弛有度,保证了阅读体验既有深思的从容,又不乏情节的引人入胜。它平衡了学术的严肃性与大众的可读性,使一个原本可能枯燥的议题,变成了一部引人入胜的史诗。我发现自己常常在夜深人静时,沉浸于这种时而缓慢推进、时而爆炸性展开的叙事之中,难以自拔。
评分### 笔触的力度与学识的厚度:令人震撼的知识密度 坦白说,这本书的知识密度非常高,初读时需要放慢速度,反复咀嚼其中的论点和引用的史料。作者仿佛将数十年的田野调查和档案挖掘的成果,浓缩在了字里行间,毫不吝惜地展示了其深厚的学术功底。它成功地避免了许多同类著作中常见的理论空泛化,而是紧紧扎根于具体的历史细节之中。阅读过程中,我不断被那些详实的数据、生动的历史片段所折服,这些元素共同构建了一个无比坚实、几乎无懈可击的论证体系。这种将严谨的实证研究与开创性的理论构建完美结合的能力,是顶尖社会科学作品的标志。它迫使读者停下来,不仅仅是“知道”发生了什么,更重要的是去“理解”为什么会发生,以及这种“发生”在更长的时间轴上意味着什么。对于那些追求深度和严谨性的读者,这本书绝对是不可错过的里程碑。
评分### 沉浸式体验:一场关于权力与秩序的深度对话 这本书真正吸引我的是它那近乎手术刀般精准的分析能力,它剥开了一层层历史事件的外衣,直达权力运作的核心机制。作者对于国家机器从集权到解体的过程,有着近乎冷酷的客观性描述,这使得阅读过程充满了智力上的挑战和享受。每一次阅读,都像是在参与一场高水平的学术辩论,关于合法性基础的瓦解、精英阶层的分裂以及新旧秩序交替时的暴力美学,都被赋予了扎实的案例支撑。书中对不同文明背景下,社会动员模式的比较分析尤其精彩,它揭示了文化和意识形态在重塑社会契约中的关键作用,远超出了单纯的经济决定论的范畴。对于任何对政治哲学和比较历史感兴趣的读者来说,这本书无疑是一座宝库,它提供的分析框架足以让你重新审视过去所学的许多“常识”,并在更广阔的维度上思考“稳定”与“变革”的本质联系。
评分我觉得嘛,就是胡扯(一个个人偏见,不一定对(一定对))
评分我觉得嘛,就是胡扯(一个个人偏见,不一定对(一定对))
评分这学期的三个大主题就social revolution我学的最好啦~~~
评分经验分析部分比方法论部分成功
评分这学期的三个大主题就social revolution我学的最好啦~~~
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有