罗杰·彭罗斯
英国数学物理学家,从1973年起担任牛津大学的罗斯·波勒数学教授,是全世界公认的最博学和最有创见的科学家、思想家、哲学家。
译者简介
许明贤,1947年出生于上海,1968年清华大学无线电系毕业,之后任教于中国科技大学。目前在美攻读博士学位。
吴忠超,1946年出生于福州,1968年毕业于中国科技大学无线电系,并任教于该校。1984年在霍金教授指导下,得到剑桥大学博士学位。
In the readition of the bestselling Chaos and A Brief History of Time, here is a science book with mainstream appeal. Proponents of artificial intelligence maintain that eventually a computer will be able to do everything a human mind can do, but Oxford University Professor of Mathematics Roger Penrose explains his view that there are facets of human thinking that can never be emulated by a machine. Drawings throughout.
Some love it, some hate it, but The Emperor's New Mind, physicist Roger Penrose's 1989 treatise attacking the foundations of strong artificial intelligence, is crucial for anyone interested in the history of thinking about AI and consciousness. Part survey of modern physics, part exploration of the philosophy of mind, the book is not for casual readers--though it's not overly technical, it rarely pauses to let the reader catch a breath. The overview of relativity and quantum theory, written by a master, is priceless and uncontroversial. The exploration of consciousness and AI, though, is generally considered as resting on shakier ground.
Penrose claims that there is an intimate, perhaps unknowable relation between quantum effects and our thinking, and ultimately derives his anti-AI stance from his proposition that some, if not all, of our thinking is non-algorithmic. Of course, these days we believe that there are other avenues to AI than traditional algorithmic programming; while he has been accused of setting up straw robots to knock down, this accusation is unfair. Little was then known about the power of neural networks and behavior-based robotics to simulate (and, some would say, produce) intelligent problem-solving behavior. Whether these tools will lead to strong AI is ultimately a question of belief, not proof, and The Emperor's New Mind offers powerful arguments useful to believer and nonbeliever alike. --Rob Lightner
高中的时候看过中文版,因为数学家Roger Penrose被很多物理学家推崇,最近又重温了一遍英文原版,结果大失所望。这本书写得实在太艰深了,作为一个学物理出身的人,我读得都很费劲,实在不知道做为一本科普书籍是如何能够吸引到大众读者的。倒是很佩服高中时候的自己居然能把这...
评分高中的时候看过中文版,因为数学家Roger Penrose被很多物理学家推崇,最近又重温了一遍英文原版,结果大失所望。这本书写得实在太艰深了,作为一个学物理出身的人,我读得都很费劲,实在不知道做为一本科普书籍是如何能够吸引到大众读者的。倒是很佩服高中时候的自己居然能把这...
评分我怀疑这本书,根本不是吴忠超翻译的! 肯定是他把书包给学生,分段翻译。结果出来之后,又审查不严,结果出现了这么垃圾的著作! 他们只想着赚钱,不考虑读者! 但是,他妈的,这竟然是唯一的中文版! 看来我除了好好学外语,没别的路了。
评分看完了前4章,太震撼太美妙了! 从来没有想到过,在康托尔、希尔伯特、哥德尔、图灵这些天才之间有如此清晰一条脉络相承!而上个世纪之初发生在罗素/怀特海、庞加莱和希尔伯特之间关于逻辑主义、直觉主义和形式主义的数学哲学大论战,竟然也直接影响了计算机是否能超过人脑这...
评分看完了前4章,太震撼太美妙了! 从来没有想到过,在康托尔、希尔伯特、哥德尔、图灵这些天才之间有如此清晰一条脉络相承!而上个世纪之初发生在罗素/怀特海、庞加莱和希尔伯特之间关于逻辑主义、直觉主义和形式主义的数学哲学大论战,竟然也直接影响了计算机是否能超过人脑这...
loving and hating his long phrases...the reasoning in the mathematical proofs is sometimes hard to get, so making me feel like jumping over important logical link. But after trying reallyreally hard to finally get the point, it seems to be because he skipped a lot of details. Not so easy to read, but surely highly interesting.
评分4-
评分Interesting.
评分罗杰彭罗斯的语言非常易懂,能把很多深奥的观点讲的很透彻~
评分Well,到后期的argument不大严谨,估计是问题本身太难了,但是足够有趣~改天写个书评。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有