美国法的变迁:1780-1860,ISBN:9787562027089,作者:(美)莫顿·J.霍维茨(Morton J.Horwitz)著;谢鸿飞译
“Legal historians and theorists are in nearly complete agreement that the non-instrumental views of the common law . . . held sway through the eighteenth century. They agree also that the instrumental view of law took hold in the course of the twentieth ce...
评分“Legal historians and theorists are in nearly complete agreement that the non-instrumental views of the common law . . . held sway through the eighteenth century. They agree also that the instrumental view of law took hold in the course of the twentieth ce...
评分“Legal historians and theorists are in nearly complete agreement that the non-instrumental views of the common law . . . held sway through the eighteenth century. They agree also that the instrumental view of law took hold in the course of the twentieth ce...
评分“Legal historians and theorists are in nearly complete agreement that the non-instrumental views of the common law . . . held sway through the eighteenth century. They agree also that the instrumental view of law took hold in the course of the twentieth ce...
评分“Legal historians and theorists are in nearly complete agreement that the non-instrumental views of the common law . . . held sway through the eighteenth century. They agree also that the instrumental view of law took hold in the course of the twentieth ce...
第一次接触法律史,非常有启发。
评分法律史研究的经典叙述模式,案例材料证明非常高密度和有说服力,提炼到法律和社会互动的高度,不单单是论制度本身,且开头结尾都有思想史的点题和升华。是高老师上专题文献时候的精读推荐本
评分挺不错的私法史书籍,在发展的洪流中,法律如何发展。在我们不断仰望民法典的今天,应该看看法律如何变迁。
评分我希望看到像本书这种高质量的美国的专业史,专题史,各个领域的。现在美国通史多,滥,没有意义。
评分我希望看到像本书这种高质量的美国的专业史,专题史,各个领域的。现在美国通史多,滥,没有意义。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有