圖書標籤: 科學哲學  哲學  Popper  科學  Philosophy  波普爾  邏輯  思維   

喜歡 The Logic of Scientific Discovery 的讀者還喜歡

• 
  Conjectures and Refutations pdf epub mobi txt 電子書 下載
• 
  The Poverty of Historicism pdf epub mobi txt 電子書 下載
• 
  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions pdf epub mobi txt 電子書 下載
• 
  The Fatal Conceit pdf epub mobi txt 電子書 下載
• 
  Principled Agents? pdf epub mobi txt 電子書 下載
• 
  The Open Society and its Enemies, Volume I pdf epub mobi txt 電子書 下載
• 
  Democracy and the Market pdf epub mobi txt 電子書 下載
• 
  Law, Legislation and Liberty pdf epub mobi txt 電子書 下載
• 
  Political Game Theory pdf epub mobi txt 電子書 下載
• 
  The Constitution of Liberty pdf epub mobi txt 電子書 下載

To what extent is the definition of falsifiability subject to scientific discovery? What is the point of demarcating science from pseudo-science if not safeguarding both against the critique from one other? Does this contribute to the divorce between arts and science, or does it enable scientific method to invade the area which it fails to govern?

science is a system of statements rather than concepts

我心中的神作，不可動搖，後人的批評也改變不瞭這一點

To what extent is the definition of falsifiability subject to scientific discovery? What is the point of demarcating science from pseudo-science if not safeguarding both against the critique from one other? Does this contribute to the divorce between arts and science, or does it enable scientific method to invade the area which it fails to govern?

"Our science is not knowledge(epistēmē): it can never claim to have attained truth...the striving for knowledge and the search for truth are still the strongest motives of scientific discovery" 這書結尾莫名感動，人類就是在感受，經曆和總結中尋求真理，縱然永遠無法達到純粹的知識，還是披荊斬棘，不斷前行。

文/ 祝阴阳 波普尔在《科学发现的逻辑》一书开篇就开宗明义：归纳（induction）问题和划界（demarcation）问题是知识理论中最基本的两个问题，而这两个问题又是紧紧缠绕密不可分的： 老式的经验主义者只愿意相信，可以在逻辑上还原为感性经验要素（比如感觉资料、印象、知觉、...  

大學時曾經趕時髦買過、卻只淺嚐而止的書；在從事研究工作多年後又翻出來再讀，方才有幾分感受。個人覺得這本書應該是從事科學研究工作的人必讀之書，因為這是一本在試圖理解科學本質的書。科学的可证伪性已是众人皆知不需多言；幾點其它的讀後感： 1. 波普尔和维特根斯坦可以...  

要知道一些看起来奇妙令人难以置信的问题是否科学，如水是否会因为感情因素形成结晶变化。应该采用证伪而不是证实~ 如果一个事件或论断，不包含可证明其为错误的前提条件，则十有八九可称为骗术~ 最简单的例子莫过于吸引力法则，理论声称只要你诚心希望并付出努力，想...

这本书很有启发性，是我读过的科学哲学书里比较有想法的一本。下面给一些特定的细节与自己的想法。我尽量模仿Popper有趣的写法。 细节1.演绎逻辑与归纳逻辑。 Carnap和Popper都意识到了演绎逻辑和归纳逻辑在实践活动上的相似。然而他们得出的结论正好相反。Carnap在他构建的概...  

Popper's work (in general) and this book (in particular) have been much admired by non-philosophers who wanted to have something simple and solid to rely on: and much despised and assaulted by other philosophers of science who liked to have something large ...