圖書標籤: Plantinga, 宗教 社會學/人類學 哲學 分析哲學 science religion philosophy,
发表于2024-12-24
Where the Conflict Really Lies pdf epub mobi txt 電子書 下載 2024
This book is a long-awaited major statement by a pre-eminent analytic philosopher, Alvin Plantinga, on one of our biggest debates -- the compatibility of science and religion. The last twenty years has seen a cottage industry of books on this divide, but with little consensus emerging. Plantinga, as a top philosopher but also a proponent of the rationality of religious belief, has a unique contribution to make. His theme in this short book is that the conflict between science and theistic religion is actually superficial, and that at a deeper level they are in concord.
Plantinga examines where this conflict is supposed to exist -- evolution, evolutionary psychology, analysis of scripture, scientific study of religion -- as well as claims by Dan Dennett, Richard Dawkins, and Philip Kitcher that evolution and theistic belief cannot co-exist. Plantinga makes a case that their arguments are not only inconclusive but that the supposed conflicts themselves are superficial, due to the methodological naturalism used by science. On the other hand, science can actually offer support to theistic doctrines, and Plantinga uses the notion of biological and cosmological "fine-tuning" in support of this idea. Plantinga argues that we might think about arguments in science and religion in a new way -- as different forms of discourse that try to persuade people to look at questions from a perspective such that they can see that something is true. In this way, there is a deep and massive consonance between theism and the scientific enterprise.
Alvin Carl Plantinga (born November 15, 1932) is an American analytic philosopher, the emeritus John A. O'Brien Professor of Philosophy at the University of Notre Dame and the inaugural holder of the Jellema Chair in Philosophy at Calvin College. He is known for his work in philosophy of religion, epistemology, metaphysics and Christian apologetics. Plantinga is the author of a number of books including, God and Other Minds (1967), The Nature of Necessity (1974), and the "warrant" series culminating in Warranted Christian Belief (2000). He has delivered the Gifford Lectures three times, and was described by Time magazine as "America's leading orthodox Protestant philosopher of God."
Plantinga居然是美國人這不科學我一直以為這種夾槍帶棍的說話方式是島國特色來著(喂!)/ 看掉三分之一快瞭,收迴前言,這不叫夾槍帶棍,這叫真槍真棍……老頭子說話真不客氣的orz / 再一次非常囫圇吞棗地過瞭一遍...必須再看一遍orz 但是Plantinga得齣的結論和Haidt非常接近不是麼 這次質疑naturalism下cognitive faculty可靠性的不是哲學傢而是一個非常empirically minded的科學傢瞭... 很好奇當Nagel評論Perhaps theism and materialist naturalism are not the only alternatives的時候 他腦中設想的第三條道路是啥 難道是被Lewis吐槽的life force之類
評分Plantinga居然是美國人這不科學我一直以為這種夾槍帶棍的說話方式是島國特色來著(喂!)/ 看掉三分之一快瞭,收迴前言,這不叫夾槍帶棍,這叫真槍真棍……老頭子說話真不客氣的orz / 再一次非常囫圇吞棗地過瞭一遍...必須再看一遍orz 但是Plantinga得齣的結論和Haidt非常接近不是麼 這次質疑naturalism下cognitive faculty可靠性的不是哲學傢而是一個非常empirically minded的科學傢瞭... 很好奇當Nagel評論Perhaps theism and materialist naturalism are not the only alternatives的時候 他腦中設想的第三條道路是啥 難道是被Lewis吐槽的life force之類
評分Plantinga居然是美國人這不科學我一直以為這種夾槍帶棍的說話方式是島國特色來著(喂!)/ 看掉三分之一快瞭,收迴前言,這不叫夾槍帶棍,這叫真槍真棍……老頭子說話真不客氣的orz / 再一次非常囫圇吞棗地過瞭一遍...必須再看一遍orz 但是Plantinga得齣的結論和Haidt非常接近不是麼 這次質疑naturalism下cognitive faculty可靠性的不是哲學傢而是一個非常empirically minded的科學傢瞭... 很好奇當Nagel評論Perhaps theism and materialist naturalism are not the only alternatives的時候 他腦中設想的第三條道路是啥 難道是被Lewis吐槽的life force之類
評分Plantinga居然是美國人這不科學我一直以為這種夾槍帶棍的說話方式是島國特色來著(喂!)/ 看掉三分之一快瞭,收迴前言,這不叫夾槍帶棍,這叫真槍真棍……老頭子說話真不客氣的orz / 再一次非常囫圇吞棗地過瞭一遍...必須再看一遍orz 但是Plantinga得齣的結論和Haidt非常接近不是麼 這次質疑naturalism下cognitive faculty可靠性的不是哲學傢而是一個非常empirically minded的科學傢瞭... 很好奇當Nagel評論Perhaps theism and materialist naturalism are not the only alternatives的時候 他腦中設想的第三條道路是啥 難道是被Lewis吐槽的life force之類
評分Plantinga居然是美國人這不科學我一直以為這種夾槍帶棍的說話方式是島國特色來著(喂!)/ 看掉三分之一快瞭,收迴前言,這不叫夾槍帶棍,這叫真槍真棍……老頭子說話真不客氣的orz / 再一次非常囫圇吞棗地過瞭一遍...必須再看一遍orz 但是Plantinga得齣的結論和Haidt非常接近不是麼 這次質疑naturalism下cognitive faculty可靠性的不是哲學傢而是一個非常empirically minded的科學傢瞭... 很好奇當Nagel評論Perhaps theism and materialist naturalism are not the only alternatives的時候 他腦中設想的第三條道路是啥 難道是被Lewis吐槽的life force之類
著名心灵、认知哲学家托马斯内格尔为本书作者普朗丁格写的评论。内格尔曾是著名的无神论者,但晚年承认有神论的合理性。 1. The gulf in outlook between atheists and adherents of the monotheistic religions is profound. We are fortunate to live under a constitution...
評分著名心灵、认知哲学家托马斯内格尔为本书作者普朗丁格写的评论。内格尔曾是著名的无神论者,但晚年承认有神论的合理性。 1. The gulf in outlook between atheists and adherents of the monotheistic religions is profound. We are fortunate to live under a constitution...
評分著名心灵、认知哲学家托马斯内格尔为本书作者普朗丁格写的评论。内格尔曾是著名的无神论者,但晚年承认有神论的合理性。 1. The gulf in outlook between atheists and adherents of the monotheistic religions is profound. We are fortunate to live under a constitution...
評分著名心灵、认知哲学家托马斯内格尔为本书作者普朗丁格写的评论。内格尔曾是著名的无神论者,但晚年承认有神论的合理性。 1. The gulf in outlook between atheists and adherents of the monotheistic religions is profound. We are fortunate to live under a constitution...
評分著名心灵、认知哲学家托马斯内格尔为本书作者普朗丁格写的评论。内格尔曾是著名的无神论者,但晚年承认有神论的合理性。 1. The gulf in outlook between atheists and adherents of the monotheistic religions is profound. We are fortunate to live under a constitution...
Where the Conflict Really Lies pdf epub mobi txt 電子書 下載 2024