Most people believe that they were either benefited or at least not harmed by being brought into existence. Thus, if they ever do reflect on whether they should bring others into existence---rather than having children without even thinking about whether they should---they presume that they do them no harm. Better Never to Have Been challenges these assumptions. David Benatar argues that coming into existence is always a serious harm. Although the good things in one's life make one's life go better than it otherwise would have gone, one could not have been deprived by their absence if one had not existed. Those who never exist cannot be deprived. However, by coming into existence one does suffer quite serious harms that could not have befallen one had one not come into existence. Drawing on the relevant psychological literature, the author shows that there are a number of well-documented features of human psychology that explain why people systematically overestimate the quality of their lives and why they are thus resistant to the suggestion that they were seriously harmed by being brought into existence. The author then argues for the 'anti-natal' view---that it is always wrong to have children---and he shows that combining the anti-natal view with common pro-choice views about foetal moral status yield a 'pro-death' view about abortion (at the earlier stages of gestation). Anti-natalism also implies that it would be better if humanity became extinct. Although counter-intuitive for many, that implication is defended, not least by showing that it solves many conundrums of moral theory about population.
具体描述
读后感
基督徒可以不用读下去了，我这篇东西也好，这本书也好，都是。因为神叫你们要“生养众多”。人的话语怎能敌神的诫命呢？真的，其他有类似教条的信徒也一样。下文仅针对他们之外的人群。 本书的核心观点在序言的第一段就明确给出：降生到世上总是伤害（coming into existence i...
评分You'd better not to do that. 你最好别做这事。 所以，Better to Never Have Been Born，意思是，最好从未出生。 这句话其实深埋在悲剧性地理解人生的灵魂里。尼采在《悲剧的诞生》中记载过弥达斯国王遭遇的来自精灵的智商暴击：“最好的东西是你根本得不到的，这就是不要降生...
评分基督徒可以不用读下去了，我这篇东西也好，这本书也好，都是。因为神叫你们要“生养众多”。人的话语怎能敌神的诫命呢？真的，其他有类似教条的信徒也一样。下文仅针对他们之外的人群。 本书的核心观点在序言的第一段就明确给出：降生到世上总是伤害（coming into existence i...
评分从思想性来讲，我认为Dr. Benatar的这本Better Never to Have Been已经做到了最好。 其实反出生主义的核心概念比较好理解，我在另一篇文章[《为什么生孩子永远是个错误》]通过Dr. Bentatar的论点证明了为什么生孩子对这个“潜在的孩子”来说永远是个错误，感兴趣的可以看一下。...
评分基督徒可以不用读下去了，我这篇东西也好，这本书也好，都是。因为神叫你们要“生养众多”。人的话语怎能敌神的诫命呢？真的，其他有类似教条的信徒也一样。下文仅针对他们之外的人群。 本书的核心观点在序言的第一段就明确给出：降生到世上总是伤害（coming into existence i...
用户评价
整本书建立在最简单的范畴谬误的基础上：说不存在的的人是更快乐还是更痛苦就像说桌子是快乐还是痛苦一样可笑。better never to have wasted time on this book
评分无神论者生孩子是不道德的。一个结论。
评分读了1/3实在读不下去了，从句绕来绕去，头不昏太难。立论的基础是4个公设：1快乐的存在是good，2痛苦的存在是bad，3快乐的缺席是not bad，4痛苦的缺席是good。而存在的人总是痛苦多于快乐，bad-good=bad；不存在的人则是good-not bad=good。
评分翻了一章不到……观点堪称惊世骇俗，但双重标准不能让人信服
评分翻了一章不到……观点堪称惊世骇俗，但双重标准不能让人信服
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有