Beatriz Magaloni is Assistant Professor of Political Science at Stanford University.
This 2006 book provides a theory of the logic of survival of the Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI), one of the most resilient autocratic regimes in the twentieth century. An autocratic regime hid behind the facade of elections that were held with clockwise precision. Although their outcome was totally predictable, elections were not hollow rituals. The PRI made millions of ordinary citizens vest their interests in the survival of the autocratic regime. Voters could not simply 'throw the rascals out of office' because their choices were constrained by a series of strategic dilemmas that compelled them to support the autocrats. The book also explores the factors that led to the demise of the PRI. The theory sheds light on the logic of 'electoral autocracies', among the most common type of autocracy, and is the only systematic treatment in the literature today dealing with this form of autocracy.
评分
评分
评分
评分
模型有点问题
评分老板规定的暑期必读书。感叹下CP领域C研究的确和拉美研究不在一个档次上,特别是对宏观的CP理论的贡献上,当C研究还在较多关注些诸如“晋升锦标赛”等不具有普遍理论意义的话题的时候,对拉美的研究已经成了威权政治和竞争民主的新理论的重要来源。
评分日本 墨西哥 土耳其
评分老板规定的暑期必读书。感叹下CP领域C研究的确和拉美研究不在一个档次上,特别是对宏观的CP理论的贡献上,当C研究还在较多关注些诸如“晋升锦标赛”等不具有普遍理论意义的话题的时候,对拉美的研究已经成了威权政治和竞争民主的新理论的重要来源。
评分感觉作者提供了一种颇为微妙的解释方式。做hegemonic party system的人会向做Dominant party system的取经,反之亦然。墨西哥政治的研究者竭力试图说服读者,墨西哥其实很像意大利和日本,执政党都是在选举中获胜。而日本和意大利政治的研究者则竭力劝说读者,意大利和日本很像拉美,天民党和自民党都靠pork politics过活。如果不看作者讨论的对象,开始还以为此书说的是自民党的故事。派阀和利益诱导政治。不过从日本的故事来看,讽刺地是,大概至少还是“纯”民主制更加有助于优位政党长期执政。毕竟倘若没有自民党的分裂,在野党93年之前都没有夺取政权的欲念。而93年之后他们有了这种欲念之后,经济无论好坏,自民党的席位不见得比93年之前更少。哪种讲故事的方式更有意思呢?
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有