In this groundbreaking history of the modern American metropolis, Richard Rothstein, a leading authority on housing policy, explodes the myth that America’s cities came to be racially divided through de facto segregation―that is, through individual prejudices, income differences, or the actions of private institutions like banks and real estate agencies. Rather, The Color of Law incontrovertibly makes clear that it was de jure segregation―the laws and policy decisions passed by local, state, and federal governments―that actually promoted the discriminatory patterns that continue to this day.
Through extraordinary revelations and extensive research that Ta-Nehisi Coates has lauded as "brilliant" (The Atlantic), Rothstein comes to chronicle nothing less than an untold story that begins in the 1920s, showing how this process of de jure segregation began with explicit racial zoning, as millions of African Americans moved in a great historical migration from the south to the north.
Through extraordinary revelations and extensive research that Ta-Nehisi Coates has lauded as "brilliant" (The Atlantic), Rothstein comes to chronicle nothing less than an untold story that begins in the 1920s, showing how this process of de jure segregation began with explicit racial zoning, as millions of African Americans moved in a great historical migration from the south to the north.
The Fair Housing Act of 1968 prohibited future discrimination but did nothing to reverse residential patterns that had become deeply embedded. Yet recent outbursts of violence in cities like Baltimore, Ferguson, and Minneapolis show us precisely how the legacy of these earlier eras contributes to persistent racial unrest. “The American landscape will never look the same to readers of this important book” (Sherrilyn Ifill, president of the NAACP Legal Defense Fund), as Rothstein’s invaluable examination shows that only by relearning this history can we finally pave the way for the nation to remedy its unconstitutional past.
Richard Rothstein is a research associate of the Economic Policy Institute and a Fellow at the Thurgood Marshall Institute of the NAACP Legal Defense Fund. He lives in California, where he is a Fellow of the Haas Institute at the University of California–Berkeley.
诚如另外一部分读者所言,此书资料翔实,立论有据,加之严肃的题材,读起来枯燥无趣,略微伤脑。但读着读着竟浮现出小时候常玩的《大富翁》游戏画面,美国白人们为了阻碍非裔美国人通过住房进行民族融合的政策手段与游戏里为了打败对手而使用的卡牌道具不谋而合。只不过虚拟游...
评分 评分 评分承lk兄亲手赠书,当时只是随口答应给他写个书评,但说出去的话总觉得是一份承诺,于是假期后半段聚起精神把书看完了,所思所想汇成此篇。(除掉扯闲篇的部分,评论约800字) 上文有修饰成分哈哈哈(但绝无谎言),真相是公号抽奖中的书,正好奖品提供者纸间悦动的总编住我家左近...
评分立足于Supreme Court Jurisprudence (Bradley v. Milliken, Parents Involved in Cmty. Sch. v. Seattle Sch. Dist. No. 1),反转其所接受的错误的事实前提,用大量事实反驳了residential segregation单纯由文化偏见与私人行为造成的迷思,而说明美国各级的政府行为如何助长乃至造就了隔离的现状,从而主张政府具有弥补过错的宪法责任;对居住环境的种族隔离及总体意义上的收入歧视之间的经济学分析直截有力,虽然还有值得深入探讨与补充之处。最后感叹一下各种五花八门的手段简直就是一部当代美帝对付低端人口史。
评分花了一个晚上和早上读了书的前一半,最喜欢这句: we say we seek diversity, not racial integration。 读后反思是:Is racial integration really a good option?
评分翔实的数据解释美国黑人与白人之间资产(主要是房产)的巨大差距,一战二战前后,黑人大规模离开南方进入北方工厂寻找就业机会,与此同时,许多针对黑人的歧视政策也开始产生,譬如政府支持的房贷不贷给黑人,街区划分时禁止出租出售给本片区的少数人群,造成城市里种族隔离越来越严重。二战之后,许多白人买到了房产,而黑人没有,几十年以后,即使这样的政策本身被取消,房价飞涨,当年失去买房机会的人也很难迎头赶上。如果没有时间读整本书,听这个fresh air访谈也就可以了: https://www.npr.org/2017/05/03/526655831/a-forgotten-history-of-how-the-u-s-government-segregated-america
评分well now I get why those old white people hate multi-family homes and urban life. #things I learned from work
评分well now I get why those old white people hate multi-family homes and urban life. #things I learned from work
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有